No i wont be banned cos ive done nowt wrong you on the other hand needs to be shown some manners
I'm ignoring the bickering - but if we sign Salah and a striker I'd like to see Sterling go on loan for somebody like Swansea as he'd come back a much better player.
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 2 minutes ago
Swansea wanted him on loan... Apparently but hey im a wum so dont believe any of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Swansea's chairman and Liverpool both say it's rubbish, yet you insist it's true Don't tell me, you ITK?
Fickle is it always like this, these guys are such holes its embarrassing they are grown ups arnt they
Fickle fred you major wuminizer how dare you say such a thing
The final piece of the jigsaw.
Errrr... No.
theo just wumming the $puds as he went off injured
Arsenal fans turn to Wum Spurs all week
What a wummer, not as good as me tho' apparently
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 56 minutes ago
"nowt wrong"
__________________________
Manc wum just gave himself away
Injury prone as shown by him leaving the pitch aided by middle-aged men.
comment by Fickle Fred Bassett BSc - I like the way you s... (U3979)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
I'm ignoring the bickering - but if we sign Salah and a striker I'd like to see Sterling go on loan for somebody like Swansea as he'd come back a much better player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens of Salah doesn't hit the ground running as so often happens with foreign signings?
comment by Taggs (U1183)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 56 minutes ago
"nowt wrong"
__________________________
Manc wum just gave himself away
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only we could hear the camp voice we'd be certain.
Walcott is a fantastic player,a bolt-on certainty for Brazil next year. I would love to see him in our team, but it isn't going to happen. I would value him at £45M+.
JimmyTheRed
£45m
What on earth have you taken Jimmy. £20m tops IMO
Henderson £18M
Downing £20M
Walcott is probably £35/40M in that case
Transfer fees never have and never will work like that.
Based on the fact that Walcott (goals and assists) is one of the most productive players in the league (obviously when he isn't injured), is on a long contract, and is still young, certainly if he left tomorrow you would to start the bidding at £25m and probably end up around £35m.
He certainly isn't worth more than £20-25m, even including the English player VAT. I like Walcott but for £40-45m you expect an established world class player, which Walcott is not and never will be. I know we spunked £35m on Carroll but let's face it, any team who wants Walcott that desperately probably doesn't have that kind of money.
Castor Troy - Sturridge: £12m. Walcott is probably worth about £7m in that case.
comment by Idioteque (U3814)
posted 16 minutes ago
He certainly isn't worth more than £20-25m, even including the English player VAT. I like Walcott but for £40-45m you expect an established world class player, which Walcott is not and never will be. I know we spunked £35m on Carroll but let's face it, any team who wants Walcott that desperately probably doesn't have that kind of money.
Castor Troy - Sturridge: £12m. Walcott is probably worth about £7m in that case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walcott is easily worth £35m in the current market.
He's entering his prime, is experienced at the highest level, has unteachable qualities (pace & instinctive finishing), years left on his deal and has a marketable 'look'.
Players like Lamela, Milner & Fernandinho all went for circa £30m - so TW14 is worth £35m+.
Also, he's far better than Sturridge, who's just a CFC & MCFC reject going through a purple patch. We've seen many mediocre English strikers score more heavily before: A Johnson, Marcus Stewart, K Phillips, Michael Ricketts etc.
Sturridge will keep scoring many league goals. I fear he may have a bit of Andy Cole about him when it comes to the top level. His scoring is certainly no purple patch though as when he is played he has always scored.
He could get better but I don't think he will particularly.
Sending out Sterling on loan is a terrible idea whoever we sign.
You make some good points SM it's just a shame you had to ruin it by slipping in a wum about Sturridge, hardly a reject considering City did not want to lose him and he'd walk into Chelsea's team now. Sturridge is a better striker than Walcott imo but Walcott does have other qualities as well as being more versatile. Just ask any Liverpool fan if they'd swap Sturridge for Walcott, I doubt you'll find one who would.
I guess there are too many variables when valuating players, it just sounds ridiculous considering many Arsenal fans were adamant that Suarez was worth no more than £50m in the summer. £35m? I don't see it, but I don't think it's too far fetched.
comment by Taggs (U1183)
posted 12 hours, 46 minutes ago
Banned again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you complain about him?
Sign in if you want to comment
walcott
Page 2 of 2
posted on 4/1/14
No i wont be banned cos ive done nowt wrong you on the other hand needs to be shown some manners
posted on 4/1/14
I'm ignoring the bickering - but if we sign Salah and a striker I'd like to see Sterling go on loan for somebody like Swansea as he'd come back a much better player.
posted on 4/1/14
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 2 minutes ago
Swansea wanted him on loan... Apparently but hey im a wum so dont believe any of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Swansea's chairman and Liverpool both say it's rubbish, yet you insist it's true Don't tell me, you ITK?
posted on 4/1/14
Fickle is it always like this, these guys are such holes its embarrassing they are grown ups arnt they
posted on 4/1/14
Fickle fred you major wuminizer how dare you say such a thing
posted on 4/1/14
LAS?
posted on 4/1/14
The final piece of the jigsaw.
Errrr... No.
posted on 4/1/14
theo just wumming the $puds as he went off injured
posted on 4/1/14
Arsenal fans turn to Wum Spurs all week
posted on 4/1/14
What a wummer, not as good as me tho' apparently
posted on 4/1/14
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 56 minutes ago
"nowt wrong"
__________________________
Manc wum just gave himself away
posted on 4/1/14
Injury prone as shown by him leaving the pitch aided by middle-aged men.
posted on 4/1/14
comment by Fickle Fred Bassett BSc - I like the way you s... (U3979)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
I'm ignoring the bickering - but if we sign Salah and a striker I'd like to see Sterling go on loan for somebody like Swansea as he'd come back a much better player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens of Salah doesn't hit the ground running as so often happens with foreign signings?
posted on 4/1/14
comment by Taggs (U1183)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by please don't ban me admins (U18997)
posted 56 minutes ago
"nowt wrong"
__________________________
Manc wum just gave himself away
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only we could hear the camp voice we'd be certain.
posted on 4/1/14
Walcott is a fantastic player,a bolt-on certainty for Brazil next year. I would love to see him in our team, but it isn't going to happen. I would value him at £45M+.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 4/1/14
£45m
What on earth have you taken Jimmy. £20m tops IMO
posted on 4/1/14
Henderson £18M
Downing £20M
Walcott is probably £35/40M in that case
posted on 4/1/14
Transfer fees never have and never will work like that.
Based on the fact that Walcott (goals and assists) is one of the most productive players in the league (obviously when he isn't injured), is on a long contract, and is still young, certainly if he left tomorrow you would to start the bidding at £25m and probably end up around £35m.
posted on 4/1/14
Banned again
posted on 5/1/14
He certainly isn't worth more than £20-25m, even including the English player VAT. I like Walcott but for £40-45m you expect an established world class player, which Walcott is not and never will be. I know we spunked £35m on Carroll but let's face it, any team who wants Walcott that desperately probably doesn't have that kind of money.
Castor Troy - Sturridge: £12m. Walcott is probably worth about £7m in that case.
posted on 5/1/14
comment by Idioteque (U3814)
posted 16 minutes ago
He certainly isn't worth more than £20-25m, even including the English player VAT. I like Walcott but for £40-45m you expect an established world class player, which Walcott is not and never will be. I know we spunked £35m on Carroll but let's face it, any team who wants Walcott that desperately probably doesn't have that kind of money.
Castor Troy - Sturridge: £12m. Walcott is probably worth about £7m in that case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walcott is easily worth £35m in the current market.
He's entering his prime, is experienced at the highest level, has unteachable qualities (pace & instinctive finishing), years left on his deal and has a marketable 'look'.
Players like Lamela, Milner & Fernandinho all went for circa £30m - so TW14 is worth £35m+.
Also, he's far better than Sturridge, who's just a CFC & MCFC reject going through a purple patch. We've seen many mediocre English strikers score more heavily before: A Johnson, Marcus Stewart, K Phillips, Michael Ricketts etc.
posted on 5/1/14
Sturridge will keep scoring many league goals. I fear he may have a bit of Andy Cole about him when it comes to the top level. His scoring is certainly no purple patch though as when he is played he has always scored.
He could get better but I don't think he will particularly.
Sending out Sterling on loan is a terrible idea whoever we sign.
posted on 5/1/14
You make some good points SM it's just a shame you had to ruin it by slipping in a wum about Sturridge, hardly a reject considering City did not want to lose him and he'd walk into Chelsea's team now. Sturridge is a better striker than Walcott imo but Walcott does have other qualities as well as being more versatile. Just ask any Liverpool fan if they'd swap Sturridge for Walcott, I doubt you'll find one who would.
I guess there are too many variables when valuating players, it just sounds ridiculous considering many Arsenal fans were adamant that Suarez was worth no more than £50m in the summer. £35m? I don't see it, but I don't think it's too far fetched.
posted on 5/1/14
comment by Taggs (U1183)
posted 12 hours, 46 minutes ago
Banned again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you complain about him?
Page 2 of 2