My question would be is where did arsenal get they're info from reguarding suarez's £40m buyout clause!
By illegally talking to his agent!
Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO.
And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal
I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents.
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale!
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale.
----------------------------------
Really?
"I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents."
Exactly. Don't get the fuss either.
"Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO."
Very clever? It was anything but. Very childish actually.
Why couldn't he just reject the bid without piping up?
"And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal"
You're finding it very hard to admit he wanted to join Arsenal.
May have gone? Who are you trying to kid here. He wasn't dying for a move. But mate he was itching for it.
Can't blame him either.
comment by Arshavin's Legacy (U10307)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
You're right. How could it be true? It's not like he's done anything like that before....
He's literally like a 6 year old trapped in a 90 year-olds body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Levy is Sandy? Makes sense now
comment by Kolo's Long Schłong - KLS! (U1695)
posted 5 minutes ago
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the agent then who needs to tell the interested club that the player is not interested in a move. Did he do that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapping_up
I was wrong!
Highly unethical!!!!!!
comment by Dubbed The New Wenger- (U18614)
posted 1 minute ago
"I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents."
Exactly. Don't get the fuss either.
"Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO."
Very clever?It was anything but. Very childish actually.
Why couldn't he just reject the bid without piping up?
"And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal"
You're finding it very hard to admit he wanted to join Arsenal.
May have gone?Who are you trying to kid here. He wasn't dying for a move. But mate he was itching for it.
Can't blame him either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've no issue in saying he may have moved but how can you say he was itching for one? Like I said if he really wanted the move he could have done lots to force it, firstly by handing in a written transfer request, explain to me why he didn't do that but was "itching" for the move? Like really give me a legitimate explanation as to why he didn’t do the thing that all players who want out of their contract do?
And how was Henry's tweet childish? He did refute the offer with a 2 line sentence that was published all over the place, it's become the tag line for the whole 40 million plus 1 bid and Liverpool have been roundly praised for their stance on the subject with Henry's tweet being the quote that sums the whole Clubs stance up. Why can I ask is it only Arsenal fans who seem to think it was unprofessional?
1. The Metro
2. Holtby is our player. We decide if he goes out on loan, not Arsenal.
3. Well played Levy. Look how wound up these Gooners are over a rumour
4. Ozil only joined Arsenal because Bale went to Real. Have some respect.
Cry me a river
Why do Liverpool fans feel the need to involve themselves in literally every topic of debate regarding Tottenham? Why? You're like the annoying pensioner down the road - constantly looking out the window to see what's going on.
What the fack has gone off here
comment by Doovdé™ (U2996)
posted 46 seconds ago
Why do Liverpool fans feel the need to involve themselves in literally every topic of debate regarding Tottenham? Why? You're like the annoying pensioner down the road - constantly looking out the window to see what's going on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll it our window and we'll look where we want!
comment by Siggy Star Dust - ICEMAN (U8747)
posted 10 seconds ago
What the fack has gone off here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most, if not all articles go down the pan the moment the mousers drive their noses into debate. Has fack all to do with them, but I suppose they haven't got their own board so they're camped on ours 24/7
comment by Siggy Star Dust - ICEMAN (U8747)
posted 52 seconds ago
What the fack has gone off here
----------------------------
some gooners have got really wound up by an article about Levy in the Metro
Can anyone enlighten me as to why Arsenal, Spurs, Holtby and Drafted involves the mousers?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
And also I've yet to see an article written that says Liverpool looked like amauter and unprofessional during the saga but I've seen plenty of Articles saying Arsenal looked a bit ridiculous albeit they seem to have been working off bad information, like I've no issue with the extra pound, if the clause was there and it had to be a bid over 40 million then it makes sense.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
its a multiteam forum, get off the site if you cant handle liverpool fans agreeing with levys supposed stance.
Sign in if you want to comment
Levy oozes class, integrity and maturity
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 16/1/14
My question would be is where did arsenal get they're info from reguarding suarez's £40m buyout clause!
By illegally talking to his agent!
posted on 16/1/14
Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO.
And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal
posted on 16/1/14
I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents.
posted on 16/1/14
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale!
posted on 16/1/14
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale.
----------------------------------
Really?
posted on 16/1/14
"I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents."
Exactly. Don't get the fuss either.
"Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO."
Very clever? It was anything but. Very childish actually.
Why couldn't he just reject the bid without piping up?
"And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal"
You're finding it very hard to admit he wanted to join Arsenal.
May have gone? Who are you trying to kid here. He wasn't dying for a move. But mate he was itching for it.
Can't blame him either.
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Arshavin's Legacy (U10307)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
You're right. How could it be true? It's not like he's done anything like that before....
He's literally like a 6 year old trapped in a 90 year-olds body.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Levy is Sandy? Makes sense now
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Kolo's Long Schłong - KLS! (U1695)
posted 5 minutes ago
It is reguarding someone else's player, who's club had stated he wasn't for sale!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its the agent then who needs to tell the interested club that the player is not interested in a move. Did he do that?
posted on 16/1/14
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapping_up
I was wrong!
Highly unethical!!!!!!
posted on 16/1/14
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Dubbed The New Wenger- (U18614)
posted 1 minute ago
"I'm pretty sure it's not illegal to talk to agents."
Exactly. Don't get the fuss either.
"Dubbed, no I really don't see what is wrong with what Henry did, he literally said "what are they smoking" as in that was derisory bid, what do you think is so unprofessional about what he said? It was obviously said tounge in cheek and was a way of deriding the offer in public without having to release a big press statment, quite clever IMO."
Very clever?It was anything but. Very childish actually.
Why couldn't he just reject the bid without piping up?
"And I believe Suarez wanted to talk to Arsenal for sure, and had the offer been good enough for him he may have gone alright but the way it gets put across sometimes is that we stopped Luis living his childhood dream of plaing for Arsenal"
You're finding it very hard to admit he wanted to join Arsenal.
May have gone?Who are you trying to kid here. He wasn't dying for a move. But mate he was itching for it.
Can't blame him either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've no issue in saying he may have moved but how can you say he was itching for one? Like I said if he really wanted the move he could have done lots to force it, firstly by handing in a written transfer request, explain to me why he didn't do that but was "itching" for the move? Like really give me a legitimate explanation as to why he didn’t do the thing that all players who want out of their contract do?
And how was Henry's tweet childish? He did refute the offer with a 2 line sentence that was published all over the place, it's become the tag line for the whole 40 million plus 1 bid and Liverpool have been roundly praised for their stance on the subject with Henry's tweet being the quote that sums the whole Clubs stance up. Why can I ask is it only Arsenal fans who seem to think it was unprofessional?
posted on 16/1/14
1. The Metro
2. Holtby is our player. We decide if he goes out on loan, not Arsenal.
3. Well played Levy. Look how wound up these Gooners are over a rumour
4. Ozil only joined Arsenal because Bale went to Real. Have some respect.
Cry me a river
posted on 16/1/14
Why do Liverpool fans feel the need to involve themselves in literally every topic of debate regarding Tottenham? Why? You're like the annoying pensioner down the road - constantly looking out the window to see what's going on.
posted on 16/1/14
What the fack has gone off here
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Doovdé™ (U2996)
posted 46 seconds ago
Why do Liverpool fans feel the need to involve themselves in literally every topic of debate regarding Tottenham? Why? You're like the annoying pensioner down the road - constantly looking out the window to see what's going on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll it our window and we'll look where we want!
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Siggy Star Dust - ICEMAN (U8747)
posted 10 seconds ago
What the fack has gone off here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most, if not all articles go down the pan the moment the mousers drive their noses into debate. Has fack all to do with them, but I suppose they haven't got their own board so they're camped on ours 24/7
posted on 16/1/14
comment by Siggy Star Dust - ICEMAN (U8747)
posted 52 seconds ago
What the fack has gone off here
----------------------------
some gooners have got really wound up by an article about Levy in the Metro
posted on 16/1/14
Can anyone enlighten me as to why Arsenal, Spurs, Holtby and Drafted involves the mousers?
posted on 16/1/14
Draxler *
posted on 16/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/1/14
And also I've yet to see an article written that says Liverpool looked like amauter and unprofessional during the saga but I've seen plenty of Articles saying Arsenal looked a bit ridiculous albeit they seem to have been working off bad information, like I've no issue with the extra pound, if the clause was there and it had to be a bid over 40 million then it makes sense.
posted on 16/1/14
posted on 16/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 16/1/14
Divvy Doovde
posted on 16/1/14
its a multiteam forum, get off the site if you cant handle liverpool fans agreeing with levys supposed stance.
Page 4 of 8
6 | 7 | 8