or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 24 comments are related to an article called:

Vuciniwho?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 19/1/14

Fifa rating hahahahahaha fecking hell

posted on 19/1/14

It's clear to see we are not going to invest heavily in buying a striker but surely there are better options than this dude.

Why not just Berbatov who has prem experience

posted on 19/1/14

Because Berbatov is not good enough and not worth the money.

posted on 19/1/14

So you would prefer vucinic instead?

posted on 19/1/14

No, I wouldn't.

posted on 19/1/14

I'd rather we got neither of them.

posted on 19/1/14

comment by Ilori (U18764)

posted 8 minutes ago

Fifa rating hahahahahaha fecking hell
---------------------------------------------------------

posted on 19/1/14

Wenger is just so stubborn when it comes to buying up front.

posted on 19/1/14

I don't get why people moan about our lack of pace one minute then demand Berbatov, the man who slows down teams to a snails pace, be signed. Doesn't really make much sense.
Vucinic also looks to be a bad choice.

posted on 19/1/14

Wenger is not going to buy a superstars striker this jan and I'm sure we can all agree on this.

Secondly yes we lack having a striker who has pace. Again, we won't buy anyone of that elk this jan.

However, what we do need is a striker regardless of anything and it's clear to see that the club, if they are actually really looking for one, are only looking for a stop gap.

So in that case, Berbatov is a better option than this juve reject

posted on 19/1/14

Getting more crap like Berbatov won't help us. He's not as useful for our system than Giroud, we have Bendtner and Podolski, who, whilst not superstars by any means, are not useless. I'd rather we use them than spend money on more crap just too say we signed one.

posted on 19/1/14

Vucinic is decent imo. Problem is he doesn't score enough goals and we are desperately lacking a goal scorer. Big fat no from me.

posted on 19/1/14

Did u guys notice, Berbatov was trying hard yday, tackling, tracking back..may b he wants to join us..so was trying to prove he is good.

posted on 19/1/14

Why can't we just prise away Morata. Would be such a good buy/loanee.

posted on 19/1/14

Morata too young. Need experience.

posted on 19/1/14

Not sure that experience is key. We just need an option. Morata scores goals, and that is what we need.
Doubt Real will sell him now though.

posted on 19/1/14

Not thrilled with either him or Berbatov

But, if it was a short term fix and it was only this guy or Berbatov I would go with the PL experienced one.

An outsider could hit the ground running straight away or take 8 months to get going, not really what we need.

posted on 19/1/14

I would take Morata but not on loan. He would need time to settle, don't think he would be a quick fix but long term he could well be the answer.

comment by (U7889)

posted on 19/1/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/1/14

We have a good link up man, even Bendtner can do it, no need to get another just because we want to sign someone.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 19/1/14

Why are people licking Morata bum hole? What's he proved? Absolutely nothing so far. Yes hes scored a couple of goals for Madrid but so could my mum.

We don't need a kid up front we need someone proven.

posted on 19/1/14

where is Andy Polo?

posted on 19/1/14

Vucinic is cack. Never liked him.

posted on 19/1/14

lol how have you not heard of Vucinic?

Talented player, very inconsistent, but clearly talented, I'd take him on a loan.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment