5

Yawn. What are you trying to achieve here op?

Few minutes of my life I'd never get back

Losing Walcott and Ramsey would be like Liverpool losing Suarez and Sturridge.

It may sound over the top, but those two were our biggest goal threats this season and they give Arsenal more of a psychological advantage.

comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
Few minutes of my life I'd never get back

-------
Takes longer to write than to read! OP has robbed himself.

this bloke is the biggest mug on JA, atleast some people can wum subtly..

Have those 2 scored 38 goals between them this season? No didn't think so

What's amazing is that the structure of the article is one of decent length meaning the OP clearly put a lot of effort into it.
5 stars from me

Whether this is meant to be funny or just offensive, it fails on both counts.

Still, at least you can enjoy your twitter followers trophy

faultless article

don't get it? is it a poor wum? or a poor attempt at irony?

Oh dear, what a dreadful article, I can't even bring myself to rate it.

Are you trying to be funny OP?

Another demented gooner

Losing Walcott and Ramsey would be like Liverpool losing Suarez and Sturridge.
-
Not it wouldn't, in terms of goal threats, yes statically it would seem so. But neither theo or Ramsey are out and out strikers meaning there would be cover upfront. Whereas SAS are both strikers meaning there is a key position that is hit with a double blow

comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 28 seconds ago
Oh dear, what a dreadful article, I can't even bring myself to rate it.

Are you trying to be funny OP?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly my thought.

http://www.2dopeboyz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/camronbill.gif

Clumsy article brehs. Very clumsy.

How were we lucky?

Lucky we didn't score double figures? Scoring from set pieces isn't lucky, your teams' defending was just rubbish.

Give over OP, you've clearly spent a long time writing out this article but it doesn't hide your obvious bitterness.

5-1

Without the offside 1st goal it would have been a different story. Robbed by the officials who couldn't even do there jobs.

comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 minutes ago
Oh dear, what a dreadful article, I can't even bring myself to rate it.

Are you trying to be funny OP?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comedic flair comes naturally to some, but no, this is an honest review of the situation.

Surely you don't think that LFC are actually as good as AFC?

Awwww, poor lickle fing. Don't you get enough attention?

Have a hug.

That village is still looking you know......

comment by Neo Liverpool (U9135)
posted 2 minutes ago
How were we lucky?

Lucky we didn't score double figures? Scoring from set pieces isn't lucky, your teams' defending was just rubbish.

Give over OP, you've clearly spent a long time writing out this article but it doesn't hide your obvious bitterness.

5-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, this article only took 10-12 minutes to write. Easy.

More importantly, yes, LFC were lucky. Lucky that Walcott & Ramsey were unavailable. Lucky that the offside opening goal was allowed to stand. Lucky that the Arsenal players lost interest and decided to save their energy.

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 2 minutes ago
Without the offside 1st goal it would have been a different story. Robbed by the officials who couldn't even do there jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The goal wasn't offside. Also it was only one goal that a good team should come back from.
We could've scored 10 if we wanted to.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator