I don't believe it until Mr.Griefs, the football exclusives publisher confirms it.
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 20 hours, 37 minutes ago
And just as a rider, QPR were supposed to be the strong favourites to win The Championship!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does it matter who was favourites?
If you comment on Spurs, expect responses back!
muffinboy..............................The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security.
I wouldn't wipe my a rse with it!!
They do however have a penchant for coming up with some exclusives from time to time.
As for the Allardyce story, I believe it has legs. Why would Morrison make up something like that? Especially as quite a number of West Ham & Allardyce himself are represented by Curtis.
This has gone on at every club Allardyce has managed where young players have suddenly been signed up to Curtis.
Allardyce himself was alleged to have been open to taking bribes way back in 2006 over transfers,an allegation which he and his son Craig both denied. There was insufficient evidence to prosecute, but it killed any chance Alardyce had of managing England.
Curtis was reprimanded by the FA in 2008 for financial irregularities involving Luton Town.
Before you say Redknapp, I do have my suspicions that he might just have got away with similar dealings in the past.
Was that a good enough reply muffinboy????
Genius owns muffin boy again
If you comment on Spurs, expect responses back!
--
You haven't comment on Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City then..
"The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security."
Do you have any proofs for this old fool? There is a always page 3 paper for people like you. Or, do you support a party that originated as a descriptive term for a mob of irish horse thieves?
"I wouldn't wipe my a rse with it!!"
Yet, you rely on this paper..so much hypocrisy from Griefs.
Generic stupid comment from Moronic..
"The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security."
This is well documented and indeed was discussed on the radio only yesterday, "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" have no consideration or thought for National Security or the safety of individuals who are trying to catch terrorists!
Not that I expect you to understand that concept muffinboy, you just dismiss everything without giving a reasonable & cogent argument to justify yourself!
PS: No comment re Allardyce being allegedly involved in dodgy dealings in the past then?
What will Guardian get that? Do you really think Guardian holds all the list of British agents? Maybe, corrupt ones.
You can educate a fool but you cannot make him think..
When you don't believe the news it print then what's the point in having discussion about one of their articles...
You complete dolt!
The Sandal Wearers Gazette have ADMITTED holding this information and indeed passing it to a sister paper in New York...................The list is of CURRENT members of MI6 and their station postings abroad! By the way current means now not electricity or a fruit!!!
Read the following:
Note comment from Government official!
The lives of British agents may have been put at risk by a Guardian journalist’s possession of top-secret documents stolen from the US government, a senior Cabinet adviser has warned.
Documents seized from the reporter’s boyfriend, David Miranda, were so sensitive that agents have since had to be moved to protect their lives.
Oliver Robbins, deputy national security adviser at the Cabinet Office, went on the record to warn that ‘lives may be put at risk’ if the documents fall in to the wrong hands.
Court papers released yesterday also revealed the incredibly lax security used around the material, with Mr Miranda apparently carrying a password for some of the computer documents written on a scrap of paper.
Security sources also said that, as a result of the theft, codes for tens of thousands of sensitive documents have had to be changed.
Details of the chaos caused at the highest levels of Britain’s security and intelligence agencies by the leaks emerged in official court submissions about material seized from Mr Miranda, the boyfriend of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald.
Mr Miranda, 28, who is Brazilian, was detained at Heathrow on August 18 as he passed through the airport on his way from Berlin to Rio.
He was found to be carrying nine hard disks and memory sticks including secret files leaked by former CIA analyst Edward Snowden, and was questioned for nine hours before being released.
Mr Miranda’s detention under terrorism powers provoked outrage from civil liberties groups.
But the newspaper’s initial story described him only as Mr Greenwald’s boyfriend, and made no mention of the fact that he was carrying secret material or that the Guardian was paying for his flights.
Despite only decrypting one third of the material, police have already discovered 58,000 classified documents, many marked secret or top secret.
In a statement to the High Court, Mr Robbins said the material was likely to contain details of secret techniques used to prevent terror attacks, personal data about agents at home and abroad and ‘other intelligence activities vital to UK national security’.
The release of the information could pose a ‘direct threat to the life of UK government employees’, as well as threaten the lives of their families.
Mr Robbins warned the judges – who granted additional powers to the police to examine the classified material – that the information that had been decrypted ‘has had a direct impact on decisions taken in regard to staff deployments and is therefore impacting operational effectiveness’.
He wrote: ‘The material seized is highly likely to describe techniques which have been crucial in life-saving counter-terrorism operations, and other intelligence activities vital to UK national security. The compromise of these methods would do serious damage to UK national security, and ultimately risk lives.’
He added: ‘A particular concern for HMG is the possibility that the identity of a UK intelligence officer might be revealed.’
GCHQ, the Government’s communications headquarters, and the police are using a large amount of resources to decrypt and process the material, Mr Robbins said.
He warned of the urgent need to identify what other material is on the hard drives ‘to assess the risks to sensitive intelligence sources and methods, and the threat to intelligence agency staff should their identities or details of their operational tradecraft be obtained by hostile actors’.
Mr Robbins said the Guardian’s publication of details from the documents had already caused ‘real and serious damage’ to national security.
Alan Rusbridger, the editor of the Guardian, branded his claims ‘unsubstantiated and inaccurate’.
He said: ‘The Guardian took every decision on what to publish very slowly and very carefully and when we met with government officials in July they acknowledged that we had displayed a “responsible” attitude.
‘The Government’s behaviour does not match their rhetoric in trying to justify and exploit this dismaying blurring of terrorism and journalism.’
Typical spurs fans wading in on an article between two proper London clubs (proper as in not deluded about their size) where we discuss football matters. And the spurs fans then quote random paper rumours and call then facts
Typical spurs fans wading in on an article between two proper London clubs (proper as in not deluded about their size) where we discuss football matters. And the spurs fans then quote random paper rumours and call then facts
___________________________________
As I said before, you opened the door commenting about Spurs, so I expect to have a right to reply.
Where have I quoted random paper rumours? In the above case "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" admit to having the Classified & Top Secret files!! So how is that a rumour?
With regard to delusion, muffinboy has been claiming for ages that they are a bigger club than Spurs, now that is delusional!
By the way, should you not be discussing things with your equals in The Championship & not bothering the Premier League teams?
The lives of British agents may have been put at risk by a Guardian journalist’s possession of top-secret documents stolen from the US government, a senior Cabinet adviser has warned.
--
"Moron, why would any foreign government holds the record of British secret service agents? As I told you earlier, you can educate a fool but you cannot make him to think... this analogy is correct in your case
It says "classified information" you utter obnoxious fool. Do you know what is a classified information?
"Moron, why would any foreign government holds the record of British secret service agents? As I told you earlier, you can educate a fool but you cannot make him to think... this analogy is correct in your case
It says Classified & Top Secret you pillock!!
Classified is used to determine level of access, it can have several levels: Confidential, Secret and Top Secret.
Individuals require security clearance at each level to read these documents.
It is actually a criminal offence to read documents listed under these banners without the correct clearance authority.
For your information both MI6 & The CIA know about and hold information on each others operatives. This has been an agreed cooperation policy for the past 50 years!! Time you learnt what really goes on the World instead of spouting the rubbish you invariably do!
It says Classified & Top Secret you pillock!!
--
Old buffoon, stick to reading the page 3 or daily fail. Tell me, how many British and American people are killed since Guardian publishing those secret files..
They "share" information not personal details of agents, you moron.
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 52 minutes ago
By the way, should you not be discussing things with your equals in The Championship & not bothering the Premier League teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
Old buffoon, stick to reading the page 3 or daily fail. Tell me, how many British and American people are killed since Guardian publishing those secret files..
They "share" information not personal details of agents, you moron.
Once again showing how immature & clueless you really are muffinboy. Of course they know personal details, thats how they link up & collaborate on missions.
Of course you will not read that an MI6 agent has been attacked or killed, however you might just read that a British Consul official has been killed in an accident or something like that.
They real jobs of these "officials" are rarely, if ever released to the public.
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
_______________________________________
I never worry about us getting put out of a competition & where have I ever said we are the big men of London? And I have not seen any comments to that effect anywhere on the Spurs postings.
No wonder you get on with muffinboy...........................together you might just manage to have one brain cell between you!
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
_______________________________________
I never worry about us getting put out of a competition & where have I ever said we are the big men of London? And I have not seen any comments to that effect anywhere on the Spurs postings.
No wonder you get on with muffinboy...........................together you might just manage to have one brain cell between you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the general attitude that ALOT of spurs fans have. The "we are bigger than you" attitude. And all that when you aren't even a big club. You never compete for major honors EVER. You are a club who have come 5th and 6th a few times and you have got above your station. Your club needs knocking down a peg or two to where you belong.
And before you go on about the championship here is london club rankings (if bayern/real mardid are 10/10):
1, Arsenal - 8/10
2, Chelsea - 6/10
3, Spurs - 5/10
4, QPR 4.5/10
5, West Ham - 4/10
6, Fulham - 2/10
Others come after here.
It is the general attitude that ALOT of spurs fans have. The "we are bigger than you" attitude. And all that when you aren't even a big club. You never compete for major honors EVER. You are a club who have come 5th and 6th a few times and you have got above your station. Your club needs knocking down a peg or two to where you belong.
What a stupid comment..............................Spurs have one of the best European Trophy records of British clubs, only Man United and Liverpool & Chelsea can claim better records in Europe. Are these not major honours??
We were the first NON League club to win the FA Cup, the first British club to win a major European Trophy. The first club to win the Double in the 20th Century, have won the FA Cup 8 times...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................No, of course you are quite right, we have never EVER competed for major trophies!
See what I mean, think your such a big club. Didn't you just say spurs fans dont do that
It is in response to your stupid comment & nowhere do I say we are bigger than anyone else!
If you write inflammatory comments you will get imflammatory comments back.....................
You stated that we never compete for major hnours EVER....................................You are showing how obviously wrong & clueless you are by that remark!
Sign in if you want to comment
Morrison any good?
Page 2 of 19
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 17/2/14
I don't believe it until Mr.Griefs, the football exclusives publisher confirms it.
posted on 17/2/14
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 20 hours, 37 minutes ago
And just as a rider, QPR were supposed to be the strong favourites to win The Championship!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why does it matter who was favourites?
posted on 17/2/14
If you comment on Spurs, expect responses back!
muffinboy..............................The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security.
I wouldn't wipe my a rse with it!!
They do however have a penchant for coming up with some exclusives from time to time.
As for the Allardyce story, I believe it has legs. Why would Morrison make up something like that? Especially as quite a number of West Ham & Allardyce himself are represented by Curtis.
This has gone on at every club Allardyce has managed where young players have suddenly been signed up to Curtis.
Allardyce himself was alleged to have been open to taking bribes way back in 2006 over transfers,an allegation which he and his son Craig both denied. There was insufficient evidence to prosecute, but it killed any chance Alardyce had of managing England.
Curtis was reprimanded by the FA in 2008 for financial irregularities involving Luton Town.
Before you say Redknapp, I do have my suspicions that he might just have got away with similar dealings in the past.
posted on 17/2/14
Was that a good enough reply muffinboy????
posted on 17/2/14
Genius owns muffin boy again
posted on 17/2/14
If you comment on Spurs, expect responses back!
--
You haven't comment on Liverpool, Arsenal and Man City then..
"The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security."
Do you have any proofs for this old fool? There is a always page 3 paper for people like you. Or, do you support a party that originated as a descriptive term for a mob of irish horse thieves?
"I wouldn't wipe my a rse with it!!"
Yet, you rely on this paper..so much hypocrisy from Griefs.
Generic stupid comment from Moronic..
posted on 17/2/14
"The Guardian or to give it its proper title "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" is a paper that supports exposing MI6 agents and therefore threatening their lives and national security."
This is well documented and indeed was discussed on the radio only yesterday, "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" have no consideration or thought for National Security or the safety of individuals who are trying to catch terrorists!
Not that I expect you to understand that concept muffinboy, you just dismiss everything without giving a reasonable & cogent argument to justify yourself!
posted on 17/2/14
PS: No comment re Allardyce being allegedly involved in dodgy dealings in the past then?
posted on 17/2/14
What will Guardian get that? Do you really think Guardian holds all the list of British agents? Maybe, corrupt ones.
You can educate a fool but you cannot make him think..
When you don't believe the news it print then what's the point in having discussion about one of their articles...
posted on 17/2/14
You complete dolt!
The Sandal Wearers Gazette have ADMITTED holding this information and indeed passing it to a sister paper in New York...................The list is of CURRENT members of MI6 and their station postings abroad! By the way current means now not electricity or a fruit!!!
Read the following:
Note comment from Government official!
The lives of British agents may have been put at risk by a Guardian journalist’s possession of top-secret documents stolen from the US government, a senior Cabinet adviser has warned.
Documents seized from the reporter’s boyfriend, David Miranda, were so sensitive that agents have since had to be moved to protect their lives.
Oliver Robbins, deputy national security adviser at the Cabinet Office, went on the record to warn that ‘lives may be put at risk’ if the documents fall in to the wrong hands.
Court papers released yesterday also revealed the incredibly lax security used around the material, with Mr Miranda apparently carrying a password for some of the computer documents written on a scrap of paper.
Security sources also said that, as a result of the theft, codes for tens of thousands of sensitive documents have had to be changed.
Details of the chaos caused at the highest levels of Britain’s security and intelligence agencies by the leaks emerged in official court submissions about material seized from Mr Miranda, the boyfriend of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald.
Mr Miranda, 28, who is Brazilian, was detained at Heathrow on August 18 as he passed through the airport on his way from Berlin to Rio.
He was found to be carrying nine hard disks and memory sticks including secret files leaked by former CIA analyst Edward Snowden, and was questioned for nine hours before being released.
Mr Miranda’s detention under terrorism powers provoked outrage from civil liberties groups.
But the newspaper’s initial story described him only as Mr Greenwald’s boyfriend, and made no mention of the fact that he was carrying secret material or that the Guardian was paying for his flights.
Despite only decrypting one third of the material, police have already discovered 58,000 classified documents, many marked secret or top secret.
In a statement to the High Court, Mr Robbins said the material was likely to contain details of secret techniques used to prevent terror attacks, personal data about agents at home and abroad and ‘other intelligence activities vital to UK national security’.
The release of the information could pose a ‘direct threat to the life of UK government employees’, as well as threaten the lives of their families.
Mr Robbins warned the judges – who granted additional powers to the police to examine the classified material – that the information that had been decrypted ‘has had a direct impact on decisions taken in regard to staff deployments and is therefore impacting operational effectiveness’.
He wrote: ‘The material seized is highly likely to describe techniques which have been crucial in life-saving counter-terrorism operations, and other intelligence activities vital to UK national security. The compromise of these methods would do serious damage to UK national security, and ultimately risk lives.’
He added: ‘A particular concern for HMG is the possibility that the identity of a UK intelligence officer might be revealed.’
GCHQ, the Government’s communications headquarters, and the police are using a large amount of resources to decrypt and process the material, Mr Robbins said.
He warned of the urgent need to identify what other material is on the hard drives ‘to assess the risks to sensitive intelligence sources and methods, and the threat to intelligence agency staff should their identities or details of their operational tradecraft be obtained by hostile actors’.
Mr Robbins said the Guardian’s publication of details from the documents had already caused ‘real and serious damage’ to national security.
Alan Rusbridger, the editor of the Guardian, branded his claims ‘unsubstantiated and inaccurate’.
He said: ‘The Guardian took every decision on what to publish very slowly and very carefully and when we met with government officials in July they acknowledged that we had displayed a “responsible” attitude.
‘The Government’s behaviour does not match their rhetoric in trying to justify and exploit this dismaying blurring of terrorism and journalism.’
posted on 17/2/14
Typical spurs fans wading in on an article between two proper London clubs (proper as in not deluded about their size) where we discuss football matters. And the spurs fans then quote random paper rumours and call then facts
posted on 17/2/14
Typical spurs fans wading in on an article between two proper London clubs (proper as in not deluded about their size) where we discuss football matters. And the spurs fans then quote random paper rumours and call then facts
___________________________________
As I said before, you opened the door commenting about Spurs, so I expect to have a right to reply.
Where have I quoted random paper rumours? In the above case "The Sandal Wearers Gazette" admit to having the Classified & Top Secret files!! So how is that a rumour?
With regard to delusion, muffinboy has been claiming for ages that they are a bigger club than Spurs, now that is delusional!
posted on 17/2/14
By the way, should you not be discussing things with your equals in The Championship & not bothering the Premier League teams?
posted on 17/2/14
The lives of British agents may have been put at risk by a Guardian journalist’s possession of top-secret documents stolen from the US government, a senior Cabinet adviser has warned.
--
"Moron, why would any foreign government holds the record of British secret service agents? As I told you earlier, you can educate a fool but you cannot make him to think... this analogy is correct in your case
It says "classified information" you utter obnoxious fool. Do you know what is a classified information?
posted on 17/2/14
"Moron, why would any foreign government holds the record of British secret service agents? As I told you earlier, you can educate a fool but you cannot make him to think... this analogy is correct in your case
It says Classified & Top Secret you pillock!!
Classified is used to determine level of access, it can have several levels: Confidential, Secret and Top Secret.
Individuals require security clearance at each level to read these documents.
It is actually a criminal offence to read documents listed under these banners without the correct clearance authority.
For your information both MI6 & The CIA know about and hold information on each others operatives. This has been an agreed cooperation policy for the past 50 years!! Time you learnt what really goes on the World instead of spouting the rubbish you invariably do!
posted on 17/2/14
It says Classified & Top Secret you pillock!!
--
Old buffoon, stick to reading the page 3 or daily fail. Tell me, how many British and American people are killed since Guardian publishing those secret files..
They "share" information not personal details of agents, you moron.
posted on 17/2/14
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 52 minutes ago
By the way, should you not be discussing things with your equals in The Championship & not bothering the Premier League teams?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
posted on 17/2/14
Old buffoon, stick to reading the page 3 or daily fail. Tell me, how many British and American people are killed since Guardian publishing those secret files..
They "share" information not personal details of agents, you moron.
Once again showing how immature & clueless you really are muffinboy. Of course they know personal details, thats how they link up & collaborate on missions.
Of course you will not read that an MI6 agent has been attacked or killed, however you might just read that a British Consul official has been killed in an accident or something like that.
They real jobs of these "officials" are rarely, if ever released to the public.
posted on 17/2/14
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
_______________________________________
I never worry about us getting put out of a competition & where have I ever said we are the big men of London? And I have not seen any comments to that effect anywhere on the Spurs postings.
No wonder you get on with muffinboy...........................together you might just manage to have one brain cell between you!
posted on 17/2/14
comment by Genius Greaves & the Soon to be Goal Machine Soldado! (U1302)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shouldn't you be worrying about what trophy you will get punted out of next? The thing is you pretend to be the big men of london and you are just a joke club really You are like chelsea's little brother, maybe even more pointless of a club as chelsea
_______________________________________
I never worry about us getting put out of a competition & where have I ever said we are the big men of London? And I have not seen any comments to that effect anywhere on the Spurs postings.
No wonder you get on with muffinboy...........................together you might just manage to have one brain cell between you!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is the general attitude that ALOT of spurs fans have. The "we are bigger than you" attitude. And all that when you aren't even a big club. You never compete for major honors EVER. You are a club who have come 5th and 6th a few times and you have got above your station. Your club needs knocking down a peg or two to where you belong.
posted on 17/2/14
And before you go on about the championship here is london club rankings (if bayern/real mardid are 10/10):
1, Arsenal - 8/10
2, Chelsea - 6/10
3, Spurs - 5/10
4, QPR 4.5/10
5, West Ham - 4/10
6, Fulham - 2/10
Others come after here.
posted on 17/2/14
It is the general attitude that ALOT of spurs fans have. The "we are bigger than you" attitude. And all that when you aren't even a big club. You never compete for major honors EVER. You are a club who have come 5th and 6th a few times and you have got above your station. Your club needs knocking down a peg or two to where you belong.
What a stupid comment..............................Spurs have one of the best European Trophy records of British clubs, only Man United and Liverpool & Chelsea can claim better records in Europe. Are these not major honours??
We were the first NON League club to win the FA Cup, the first British club to win a major European Trophy. The first club to win the Double in the 20th Century, have won the FA Cup 8 times...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................No, of course you are quite right, we have never EVER competed for major trophies!
posted on 17/2/14
See what I mean, think your such a big club. Didn't you just say spurs fans dont do that
posted on 17/2/14
It is in response to your stupid comment & nowhere do I say we are bigger than anyone else!
If you write inflammatory comments you will get imflammatory comments back.....................
posted on 17/2/14
You stated that we never compete for major hnours EVER....................................You are showing how obviously wrong & clueless you are by that remark!
Page 2 of 19
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10