Commons?

Change Forrest for Commons and you've probably got it about right.

He looked off the boil on Saturday.

No-one noticed how I said bored (because I'm bored) rather than Board

I'd play 3-5-2


Majstorovic..............K.Wilson..............Mulgrew

Forest.....Brown........Wanyama.....Ki.......Ledley

...............Stokes....................Commons/Samaras/Maloney

The spelling police let you off with it.

Pretending you meant it makes it look worse though - it doesnt do you any favours at all to think it was an intentional 'play on words'.

im shocked that people think commons is off boil!!

3 games 3 assists and should have scored very unlucky to hit inside of post plus set up ki for 3rd killer goal against utd

guy can win games for us and you cant find place for him!!

commons on left sammy and stokes uptop

sammy drifiting in and out of striker and attacking midfeilder role

but i think you might find a shock lineup!!

maloney playing just of sammy!! stokes dropped for no reason i just have a hunch thats what he will do

Stokes does not deserve to be dropped he is the best finisher in the SPL, in my opinion, and is always harshly left out,.

your right mate and i hope we dont i hope it sammy and stokes but just think lenny feels we need big man small man up front

No way Lenny will drop Stokes for this one IMO

The only hesiation I think Lennon might have regards to playing Stokes is Hooper is now injured, we can't afford the same to happen to Stokes. Taylor - fock off

Sometimes I think Celtic supporters are on drugs! I mean who would even consider Murphy up front? Or playing a 3-5-2 in Europe? Or dropping Commons who was played out of position the first 2 games and then was back to his best in his usual position? Or considering playing Maloney because he had a good 20 minutes on Saturday? Or playing Forrest instead of Brown?

For goodness sake lets clear this up, we need to play a solid 4-4-2. No wingers thank you very much and Stokes MUST play up front. Please don't write of Sion because they will make us battle for a win and you are all fools if you think we are going to just show up and win 4-0.

Its coming home, hail hail

stokesnewboyd:

i dont want murphy forrest or 3-5-2 i just think lenny will surprise us but for what its worth id play this

-------------zaluska--------

m.wilson-----k.wilson----maj-----mulgrew

brown------ki-----ledley------commons

-----------sammy---------stokes-----

with maloney coming on for sammy if were doing well and paddy for commons

bhoyd, looks a good team to me and probably the same I would play. Only thing I may change is the formation (I know I mentioned 442 earlier) by giving Sammy a free role between midfield and up front so I guess a 4-4-1-1 kind of thing. I mean lets face it, Sammy plays wherever he wants to anyway on the left, on the right, in the middle etc so why not give him what he wants? That said, I do actually rate him even though he is very frustrating and he is a far superior choice compared to Murphy.

yes mate 4-4-1-1 sounds about right sammy getting ball deep and driving forward with his flowing locks gliding past people and sticking it right in the top corner .....of row z!!!!

Bhoys we are getting far too technical here.
I think it should be sufficient enough to pick the players and the formation, particularly up front and maybe attacking midfield will evolve as the game goes on. We need to start with what we are familiar with and lets see what develops.