They would be top of the league points clear with him, possibly if they had offered an extra 5-10m
Check out this video made by our Norweigan fan branch, spine tingling stuff. What a player
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzsSIWi8s0w
The ref at the Chelsea game today has to be in with a shout for biggest blooper
As does baby d:ck , I mean baby face Ole Gunnar solskjaer , this was all over the papers yesterday saying he would much rather have Rooney and RVP than our two..... What a he must feel like now
Get to the championship ole where teams play music when they score
We wouldn't be clear at the top because if we signed him he would probably be injured right now
I didn't know he said he'd rather have Rooney and RVP the tít
Suarez never gets injured.
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 (U1661)
posted 20 seconds ago
Suarez never gets injured.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But if Arsenal signed him he would. All the players we want fit get injured. And the donkey we have upfront seems to be the only player in our squad who never does
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
posted 3 minutes ago
We wouldn't be clear at the top because if we signed him he would probably be injured right now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Appreciate your sense of humor tremendously.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-hero-ole-gunnar-3269950
Man the ugly face assassin why so much hatred towards us. I mean his team where well on top during his playing days. Here is another beauty from him
Paid over it for ozil.....took the pi$$ over Suarez....
Arsenal called our bluff and boy, did they get burned.
Arsenal didn't commit an error in bidding the amount they bid. Their error was inexplicably not pressing their claim.
A buy out clause is a buy out clause. Liverpool stood their ground and Arsenal decided not to fight a battle that legally they were certain to win.
Why have a buy out clause if it has no affect on the player's contractual situation? Surely, if you have it in writing that a player can leave for a set amount, and that amount is offered, then he should be free to move.
I have no idea how Liverpool managed to get away so freelt with overriding a contract they signed, and had the nerve to insult Arsenal for meeting those legal rewuirements.
But I hope it's a watershed. Buy out clauses aren't worth the paper they are written on.
we did with Suarez what United did with Heinze years back.
and Suarez' agent wrote/provided a poor contract. He's an idiot.
Poor contract? No. Did your owner not recently come out and say Arsenal met your buy out clause and you just said "no." Pretty sure he did. So basically renderinf a legal term of a contract meaningless.
You're completely right with the Heinze sutuation btw. It was in writing that he could move to anybody for a set price, Liverpool met the price and then United realised that they'd messed up. It wound up going through court and somehow we got away with it apparently being implied that Liverpool were not included in the agreement. Must have been a great lawyer!!!
The pfa / league bureaucrats looked at Suarez' contract and said it was rubbish and vague and not really binding
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/liverpool-transfer-news-pfa-chief-2137102
I think Henry was on the wind up.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 9 hours, 26 minutes ago
Arsenal didn't commit an error in bidding the amount they bid. Their error was inexplicably not pressing their claim.
A buy out clause is a buy out clause. Liverpool stood their ground and Arsenal decided not to fight a battle that legally they were certain to win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they would have been certain to win - the PFA had their lawyers poring over the contract and they said there was no enforceable clause
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
The biggest "error" in prem history?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 22/3/14
They would be top of the league points clear with him, possibly if they had offered an extra 5-10m
Check out this video made by our Norweigan fan branch, spine tingling stuff. What a player
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzsSIWi8s0w
posted on 22/3/14
The ref at the Chelsea game today has to be in with a shout for biggest blooper
As does baby d:ck , I mean baby face Ole Gunnar solskjaer , this was all over the papers yesterday saying he would much rather have Rooney and RVP than our two..... What a he must feel like now
Get to the championship ole where teams play music when they score
posted on 22/3/14
We wouldn't be clear at the top because if we signed him he would probably be injured right now
posted on 22/3/14
I didn't know he said he'd rather have Rooney and RVP the tít
posted on 22/3/14
Suarez never gets injured.
posted on 22/3/14
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 (U1661)
posted 20 seconds ago
Suarez never gets injured.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But if Arsenal signed him he would. All the players we want fit get injured. And the donkey we have upfront seems to be the only player in our squad who never does
posted on 22/3/14
john henry what a man
posted on 22/3/14
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
posted 3 minutes ago
We wouldn't be clear at the top because if we signed him he would probably be injured right now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Appreciate your sense of humor tremendously.
posted on 22/3/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/3/14
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-hero-ole-gunnar-3269950
Man the ugly face assassin why so much hatred towards us. I mean his team where well on top during his playing days. Here is another beauty from him
posted on 22/3/14
Paid over it for ozil.....took the pi$$ over Suarez....
posted on 22/3/14
Arsenal called our bluff and boy, did they get burned.
posted on 23/3/14
Arsenal didn't commit an error in bidding the amount they bid. Their error was inexplicably not pressing their claim.
A buy out clause is a buy out clause. Liverpool stood their ground and Arsenal decided not to fight a battle that legally they were certain to win.
posted on 23/3/14
Why have a buy out clause if it has no affect on the player's contractual situation? Surely, if you have it in writing that a player can leave for a set amount, and that amount is offered, then he should be free to move.
I have no idea how Liverpool managed to get away so freelt with overriding a contract they signed, and had the nerve to insult Arsenal for meeting those legal rewuirements.
But I hope it's a watershed. Buy out clauses aren't worth the paper they are written on.
posted on 23/3/14
we did with Suarez what United did with Heinze years back.
and Suarez' agent wrote/provided a poor contract. He's an idiot.
posted on 23/3/14
Poor contract? No. Did your owner not recently come out and say Arsenal met your buy out clause and you just said "no." Pretty sure he did. So basically renderinf a legal term of a contract meaningless.
You're completely right with the Heinze sutuation btw. It was in writing that he could move to anybody for a set price, Liverpool met the price and then United realised that they'd messed up. It wound up going through court and somehow we got away with it apparently being implied that Liverpool were not included in the agreement. Must have been a great lawyer!!!
posted on 23/3/14
The pfa / league bureaucrats looked at Suarez' contract and said it was rubbish and vague and not really binding
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/liverpool-transfer-news-pfa-chief-2137102
I think Henry was on the wind up.
posted on 23/3/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/3/14
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 9 hours, 26 minutes ago
Arsenal didn't commit an error in bidding the amount they bid. Their error was inexplicably not pressing their claim.
A buy out clause is a buy out clause. Liverpool stood their ground and Arsenal decided not to fight a battle that legally they were certain to win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they would have been certain to win - the PFA had their lawyers poring over the contract and they said there was no enforceable clause
posted on 23/3/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1