or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 27 comments are related to an article called:

Cook's12 months @ average of 96

Page 1 of 2

posted on 18/8/11

Are you his agent?

comment by Jezzer (U4205)

posted on 18/8/11

now that's what i call a spell of great form.

Let's hope it continues.

posted on 18/8/11

Form comes and goes, class is perminant. Cook will get ALL the english test records and get near the top of the all time run getters. Not 27 till xmas day almost 6000 runs averaging 50. With the possibility of another 10-12 years of test cricket, another 10,000 runs? Who knows.

comment by Maksi (U2561)

posted on 18/8/11

We are lucky to have that young man in our team. Lets hope he continues to make these excellent scores as we continue to blow away everybody and everything that is unlucky enought to get in the way of our superb cricket team

posted on 19/8/11

he is a good cricketer no doubt. Came in with the pressure of being tresco's replacement (i may be wrong on that) and struggled for a little while but what a good player! Hopefully he can keep this form up (although it is unlikely) and keep on averaging over 50 every year!

comment by Topdawg (U8684)

posted on 19/8/11

has tendulkar ever had such good form?

posted on 19/8/11

What are his 2011 stats? I don't think he will get close to moyo's record of most runs in a calandar year.

comment by (U3445)

posted on 19/8/11

Hmmm, weren't most of those scores against 2 sides (India and Australia) in complete meltdown and Bangladesh?

I think even Englands tailenders are averaging in the 60s so perhaps it is all relative?

comment by (U6361)

posted on 19/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/8/11

Once Cook takes over from Strauss, England will become the New Australia in cricket.

Cook will break record after record & England will get stronger & stronger

posted on 19/8/11

Cook will be there till doomsday against the Indian bowling..

comment by Pox (U2677)

posted on 19/8/11

So long cooksy

comment by tweedle (U7573)

posted on 19/8/11

"Hmmm, weren't most of those scores against 2 sides (India and Australia) in complete meltdown and Bangladesh?"

Like I said in an earlier post - England's victories never count. We're never good - other sides are just bad.

comment by (U3445)

posted on 19/8/11

Well I think that the opposition you face is a fair point of discussion.

I mean, name a time that Cook carried an England innings in that time. When in the last year has he faced a really testing attack? Other than in Perth where he scored only a handful.

Come on, I am only being devils advocate but prove me wrong! Boycotts grandmum would have raced cook to the middle to face the aussies, bangladeshis or indians attacks this year right?

comment by BO$$™ (U6401)

posted on 19/8/11

great stuff from cook BUT the Aussies, Indian and bengies hardly have the most potent attack these days.

comment by MMaaxx (U9506)

posted on 19/8/11

Other England batsman have had to face the same bowlers yet I don't think (haven't looked at the stats) they've done as well. So even though the teams and bowlers are not as good as past years, credit must be given to Cook.

posted on 19/8/11

To think, some people were actually laughing at the notion he could overtake Sachin in terms of batting achievements. He has already surpassed Sachin's highest ever score in a Test innings.

comment by MMaaxx (U9506)

posted on 19/8/11

While I think Cook is doing fantastically well and is in great form, whether he can be compared to greats like Tendulkar, Kallis etc is a different matter.

If you compare his stats to Kallis' you'll note that he has played around 50% less matches than Kallis, 146 matches verses 71.

The stats show that he is effectively on course to equal Kallis' records as Cook's records are about 50% those of Kallis':

100's: 40 vs 19
50's: 54 vs 26
Runs:11947 vs 5834

The big difference now is in average with Kallis on 57 and Cook on 49 however Cooks is likely to improve as may Kallis'.

The difference is that Kallis achieved his stats against bowlers like McGrath, Warne, Vaas, Bond, Kumble, Muri, Ambrose, Welsh, Lee, the great Pakistani fast bowlers and spinners etc etc while the only true world class bowler (potential great) these days is Steyn. Pitches now are also easier for batting and averages accross the game seem to be 10 - 15 up from 10 years ago (due to limited bowling and better batting surfaces).

Therefore, while Cook must be commended for his current run of form as it is not his fault that the opposition are not what they were but I cannot see how he can be seen in the league of Tendulkar, Kallis, Ponting and Lara whether he ends his career with similar stats or not.

comment by Maksi (U2561)

posted on 19/8/11

A bit harsh, none of the great batsmen from yesteryear had to face raina, tendulkar and dhoni ( bowling with his gloves on, hardly used mind because he can't stop the ball behind the stumps) What a joke this Indian team is?

posted on 19/8/11

Kallis had to face England bowling to in the past and that was useless... Now the boots on the other foot. Suddenly England have all the aces and the standard as dropped? .

comment by MMaaxx (U9506)

posted on 19/8/11

Don't get all defensive, reread my post, it makes perfect sense.

Believe it or not Kallis did not only play England his whole career. Besides Caddick, Fraser, Flintoff, Harmison (in form) etc particularly on English pitches were pretty decent bowlers. All better than most fast bowlers around today.

SA for example fielded a three prong fast bowling attack of Donald, Pollock and Ntini with a young Kallis being the fourth. Much stronger than Steyn, Morkel, Parnel and Tsotsobe.

Any logical cricket fan cannot deny that the level of bowling has dropped and that pitches favour the batsman more than in the past. It's a fact!

comment by Jezzer (U4205)

posted on 20/8/11

It's a strange thing with these averages. I don't think batsmen have got drastically better in the last 5-10 years, or the bowlers drastically worse, i Just think the pitches now offer more help to batsmen, and the one day game has increased scoring rates, added to improvements in bat technology and the greater prevelance of the Kook ball.

In other words, do i think that Kevin Pietersen is better than steve waugh even though their batting averages are roughly the same? no. Waugh in my view is the better batsman, because he achived an average of 50 when batting was a bit harder.

posted on 20/8/11

comment by ireallylikechristmas (U7573)
posted 16 hours, 43 minutes ago

"Hmmm, weren't most of those scores against 2 sides (India and Australia) in complete meltdown and Bangladesh?"

=====================

My God. WhatACock you are.

He scored the majority of his runs against the number one team in the World and the deposed number one team in the World.

However, how did that spineless bunchOfShite ever get to no1 in the World?

comment by Maksi (U2561)

posted on 20/8/11

Good post Town Cryer

posted on 20/8/11

Saw on t.v that Ian Bell is averages close to 90 in test that he has played since 2010.One of the reason for England's dominance in the last year and a half has been the form of Bell, Trott and Cook.

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment