Money money money!
Now let's spend it!
and some rival fans on here are claiming we'd struggle to comply with ffp regs
====================================
Strangely enough, one of the first I read, was from a City fan.
£1.2m for every place, what, we get £2.4m
I disagree with the TV appearance fees - the bigger clubs will always get shown more which guarantees them more money.....which guarantees they stay bigger
It's wrong.
Kaiser, surely then the placement money should be reversed too then. the lower a club finishes the more money it gets to become competitive.
arsenal could start competing for the bottom 3 trophy
I actually agree with that 19th
Stuff thst we should be allowed to negotiate our own tv deal. If so we would be a major powerhouse
That's why Real and Barca have so much money. They have their own TV deals; they are not locked in to a PL-style payment plan. Oh, of only LFC could broker its own deal, both nationally and internationally. I am sure that is where FSG are headed, that's where the big money is.
JimmyTheRed
thing is the bigger clubs should be paid more, they have the more fans, more subscribers to sky I bet etc too, don't see why its unfair really the bigger clubs contribute more.
Jtr.....that was one of the first points fsg looked at; lfc to broker their own tv deals like barca, it got torpedoed by the league
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Got_ I didn't know that but shouldn't be surprised. I would bet that they will try to free themselves from that contract and policy if they can. Bring it on.
JimmyTheRed
"thing is the bigger clubs should be paid more, they have the more fans, more subscribers to sky I bet etc too, don't see why its unfair really the bigger clubs contribute more."
the bigger clubs get a lot more through gate receipts, sponsorship deals, global merchandise.
Anything got through participation in the football comps (including 'prize money', TV money, and CL money) should be at a minimum distributed evenly as it's the fairest way and if you want to promote competition then you should even consider inverting some of it to promote competition.
How far do you go with that though kaisers?
The current amount the lowest teams get is making the championship less competitive, from this season that will only increase, the funds a club receive, for one season in the premier league, invested wisely will start causing 6-10 teams to yo-yo between the top two divisions. This would only get worse with broader sharing of the tv rights.
What really needs addressing in football is parachute payments. the money allocated to the football league when a team goes up before the end of the "parachute" is not cumulative I.e. If qpr came back up this season they wouldn't need two years of their parachute payments, this money is then split right down the league structure each year, if Fulham come back up next season they won't need their parachute either, but the lower league clubs will not receive two payments the following year (second year of qpr payment, first year of Fulham) they just receive the higher (as the parachute is a split of the tv revenue it increases as the tv rights do) if these payments were cumulative, (often more than one team is re-promoted as well as promotions.in subsequent years) then it would perhaps prevent this (and a lot of clubs going bust) and make the lower leagues more competitive (as would a good b team structure)
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Parachute payments are essential, i just think the pl should show more solidarity with the football league and stop grabbing the majority of it back..
It would really benefit the infrastructure of clubs in the football league, you then give them the chance to invest it cleverly to build the club. Especially if it could be ringmarked for infrastructure/youth projects.
TKT. While your suggestion has merit, it is based on the premise that the owners of such club who would benefit would act wisely in their endeavours, and that's where your suggestion crashes and burns. Look how panic sets in towards the end of a season, and in an effort to stay in the game, the owners (Tan? And he is definitely not alone) spend like there no tomorrow, with no guarantee of success.
JimmyTheRed
How is that any different to now though Jimmy?
My suggestion just spreads the cash more evenly
Like I said, I don't disagree with your suggestion. Bring it on.
JimmyTheRed
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
tv money
Page 1 of 1
posted on 6/5/14
Money money money!
Now let's spend it!
posted on 6/5/14
and some rival fans on here are claiming we'd struggle to comply with ffp regs
====================================
Strangely enough, one of the first I read, was from a City fan.
posted on 6/5/14
£1.2m for every place, what, we get £2.4m
posted on 6/5/14
I disagree with the TV appearance fees - the bigger clubs will always get shown more which guarantees them more money.....which guarantees they stay bigger
It's wrong.
posted on 6/5/14
Kaiser, surely then the placement money should be reversed too then. the lower a club finishes the more money it gets to become competitive.
arsenal could start competing for the bottom 3 trophy
posted on 6/5/14
I actually agree with that 19th
posted on 6/5/14
Stuff thst we should be allowed to negotiate our own tv deal. If so we would be a major powerhouse
posted on 6/5/14
That's why Real and Barca have so much money. They have their own TV deals; they are not locked in to a PL-style payment plan. Oh, of only LFC could broker its own deal, both nationally and internationally. I am sure that is where FSG are headed, that's where the big money is.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 6/5/14
thing is the bigger clubs should be paid more, they have the more fans, more subscribers to sky I bet etc too, don't see why its unfair really the bigger clubs contribute more.
posted on 6/5/14
Jtr.....that was one of the first points fsg looked at; lfc to broker their own tv deals like barca, it got torpedoed by the league
posted on 6/5/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/5/14
Got_ I didn't know that but shouldn't be surprised. I would bet that they will try to free themselves from that contract and policy if they can. Bring it on.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 7/5/14
"thing is the bigger clubs should be paid more, they have the more fans, more subscribers to sky I bet etc too, don't see why its unfair really the bigger clubs contribute more."
the bigger clubs get a lot more through gate receipts, sponsorship deals, global merchandise.
Anything got through participation in the football comps (including 'prize money', TV money, and CL money) should be at a minimum distributed evenly as it's the fairest way and if you want to promote competition then you should even consider inverting some of it to promote competition.
posted on 7/5/14
How far do you go with that though kaisers?
The current amount the lowest teams get is making the championship less competitive, from this season that will only increase, the funds a club receive, for one season in the premier league, invested wisely will start causing 6-10 teams to yo-yo between the top two divisions. This would only get worse with broader sharing of the tv rights.
What really needs addressing in football is parachute payments. the money allocated to the football league when a team goes up before the end of the "parachute" is not cumulative I.e. If qpr came back up this season they wouldn't need two years of their parachute payments, this money is then split right down the league structure each year, if Fulham come back up next season they won't need their parachute either, but the lower league clubs will not receive two payments the following year (second year of qpr payment, first year of Fulham) they just receive the higher (as the parachute is a split of the tv revenue it increases as the tv rights do) if these payments were cumulative, (often more than one team is re-promoted as well as promotions.in subsequent years) then it would perhaps prevent this (and a lot of clubs going bust) and make the lower leagues more competitive (as would a good b team structure)
posted on 7/5/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/5/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/5/14
Redmond?
posted on 7/5/14
wrong article
posted on 7/5/14
Parachute payments are essential, i just think the pl should show more solidarity with the football league and stop grabbing the majority of it back..
It would really benefit the infrastructure of clubs in the football league, you then give them the chance to invest it cleverly to build the club. Especially if it could be ringmarked for infrastructure/youth projects.
posted on 7/5/14
TKT. While your suggestion has merit, it is based on the premise that the owners of such club who would benefit would act wisely in their endeavours, and that's where your suggestion crashes and burns. Look how panic sets in towards the end of a season, and in an effort to stay in the game, the owners (Tan? And he is definitely not alone) spend like there no tomorrow, with no guarantee of success.
JimmyTheRed
posted on 7/5/14
How is that any different to now though Jimmy?
My suggestion just spreads the cash more evenly
posted on 7/5/14
Like I said, I don't disagree with your suggestion. Bring it on.
JimmyTheRed
Page 1 of 1