Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
Nah. Lets give them Ryo Miyaichi.
Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Are you Brian Badonde?
Better still lets offer them Giroud.
no way Campbell has to be in the squad next season he has something about him, watch out Woy.
Jenius99
Better still lets offer them Diaby!!
Jenius99
Better still lets offer them Diaby!!
-=-=-=-=-
To be honest, some of Milan's transfer activity in recent times has been so, shall we say 'left of field', that that's not the most outrageous notion I've heard this week.
We have enough money to not worry about a cut price deal and have both of them.
Yes this Balotelli thing is sticking well. However, details like we will offer him £180k per week must be b/s because why would Arsenal announce their offer before even speaking to the player? Made up, it must be. I hope the whole thing is not fabricated!
Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Are you Brian Badonde?
___________________________
Baaaahahahahaha FACE JACKER
Hold on to JC especially because of Walcott's consistent injuries. Could loan them Sanogo in return for a season.
It's gonna be Higuain all over again after the world cup Balotelli will be spotted everywhere and be 'close' 'having a medical' or 'done deal'...via twitter. Then sooner or later will come out that we haven't even looked at him and he goes elsewhere......I do think we should hold onto Campbell
It's gonna be Higuain all over again
----------------------
Unfortunately, as Arsenal supporters we know this!
It's gonna be Higuain all over again
----------------------
Unfortunately, as Arsenal supporters we know this!
=-=-=-=-=-=
Now I'm often scathing on Arsenal's transfer philosophy and approach to signing players, but I have to stand up for the club on the Higuain debacle.
We don't know how 'real' this Balotelli business is. Higuain WAS in the offing, a deal had (as always) been agreed 'in principle' between Arsenal and Madrid for the player.
Madrid didn't just move the goalposts on the deal, so much as smashed them to pieces and have them concreted over.
Napoli were flush all of a sudden having sold Cavani to PSG and their chairman made it known he was intent on spending as much money as possible on anything with a pulse!
The moment that happened the Higuain transfer was only going one way, to Southern Italy. Madrid immediately hiked the price for Higuain by a cool £12 million, knowing that Arsenal wouldn't pay that over-inflated fee and Napoli would. The rest as they say, is history...
Fair statement Moist but how do we know we won't have a similar problem with Super Mario? Puma?
Id rather keep Campbell as well. Hes better than the new pkayers that seem to keep coming I like Sanogo and he will exciting to add to the squad. Even netter he's already ours so wont ost anything. if we did swap hin + cash for Mario do you think we woild bring in someone else as good. No chance
Fair statement Moist but how do we know we won't have a similar problem with Super Mario? Puma?
-=-=-=-=-
We don't mate. Us plebs are utterly clueless, hence wallys like me posting articles about it.
I was listening to some journos chat about the situation. Saying in principle it's difficult to believe that Wenger would ever entertain having a player as 'wild at heart' as Balo at Arsenal. However, they went on to discuss how (apparently) Wenger is and has for some time been a huge admirer of Balotelli's talents. And maybe, he'd like the chance to be 'the one' who tames this wild stallion!
We don't mate. Us plebs are utterly clueless, hence wallys like me posting articles about it.
--------------------
Legend!
If we had to lose JC to get our number 1 striker target then JC would have to go.
Hopefully it wont come to that and we can have both.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Campbell + cash, for cut price Balotelli?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 20/6/14
Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
posted on 20/6/14
Nah. Lets give them Ryo Miyaichi.
posted on 20/6/14
Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Are you Brian Badonde?
posted on 20/6/14
Better still lets offer them Giroud.
posted on 20/6/14
no way Campbell has to be in the squad next season he has something about him, watch out Woy.
posted on 20/6/14
Jenius99
Better still lets offer them Diaby!!
posted on 20/6/14
Jenius99
Better still lets offer them Diaby!!
-=-=-=-=-
To be honest, some of Milan's transfer activity in recent times has been so, shall we say 'left of field', that that's not the most outrageous notion I've heard this week.
posted on 20/6/14
We have enough money to not worry about a cut price deal and have both of them.
Yes this Balotelli thing is sticking well. However, details like we will offer him £180k per week must be b/s because why would Arsenal announce their offer before even speaking to the player? Made up, it must be. I hope the whole thing is not fabricated!
posted on 20/6/14
Milan have Robinho, El shawaary, Niang who are all bersatile forwards
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Are you Brian Badonde?
___________________________
Baaaahahahahaha FACE JACKER
posted on 20/6/14
Hold on to JC especially because of Walcott's consistent injuries. Could loan them Sanogo in return for a season.
posted on 20/6/14
It's gonna be Higuain all over again after the world cup Balotelli will be spotted everywhere and be 'close' 'having a medical' or 'done deal'...via twitter. Then sooner or later will come out that we haven't even looked at him and he goes elsewhere......I do think we should hold onto Campbell
posted on 20/6/14
It's gonna be Higuain all over again
----------------------
Unfortunately, as Arsenal supporters we know this!
posted on 20/6/14
It's gonna be Higuain all over again
----------------------
Unfortunately, as Arsenal supporters we know this!
=-=-=-=-=-=
Now I'm often scathing on Arsenal's transfer philosophy and approach to signing players, but I have to stand up for the club on the Higuain debacle.
We don't know how 'real' this Balotelli business is. Higuain WAS in the offing, a deal had (as always) been agreed 'in principle' between Arsenal and Madrid for the player.
Madrid didn't just move the goalposts on the deal, so much as smashed them to pieces and have them concreted over.
Napoli were flush all of a sudden having sold Cavani to PSG and their chairman made it known he was intent on spending as much money as possible on anything with a pulse!
The moment that happened the Higuain transfer was only going one way, to Southern Italy. Madrid immediately hiked the price for Higuain by a cool £12 million, knowing that Arsenal wouldn't pay that over-inflated fee and Napoli would. The rest as they say, is history...
posted on 20/6/14
Fair statement Moist but how do we know we won't have a similar problem with Super Mario? Puma?
posted on 20/6/14
Id rather keep Campbell as well. Hes better than the new pkayers that seem to keep coming I like Sanogo and he will exciting to add to the squad. Even netter he's already ours so wont ost anything. if we did swap hin + cash for Mario do you think we woild bring in someone else as good. No chance
posted on 20/6/14
Fair statement Moist but how do we know we won't have a similar problem with Super Mario? Puma?
-=-=-=-=-
We don't mate. Us plebs are utterly clueless, hence wallys like me posting articles about it.
I was listening to some journos chat about the situation. Saying in principle it's difficult to believe that Wenger would ever entertain having a player as 'wild at heart' as Balo at Arsenal. However, they went on to discuss how (apparently) Wenger is and has for some time been a huge admirer of Balotelli's talents. And maybe, he'd like the chance to be 'the one' who tames this wild stallion!
posted on 20/6/14
We don't mate. Us plebs are utterly clueless, hence wallys like me posting articles about it.
--------------------
Legend!
posted on 20/6/14
If we had to lose JC to get our number 1 striker target then JC would have to go.
Hopefully it wont come to that and we can have both.
Page 1 of 1