Cheatberg again sets his fastest lap by exceeding the track limits, seems like I have to retract my statement about eagle eyed stewards, these fools are as blind as bats!
You sad that you're bum boy is struggling in the best car on the grid lol
Cheatberg tried to get lovey dovey with Massa at the post qualifying interview, but Massa told him to F-off right in the glare of the media
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Looks like our beloved Wolve just had his usual chat with Lowe, to give Lewis the usual dose of dismal pitstops!
1st pitstop Cheatberg 2.9s vs Lewis 3.5
2nd pitstop Cheatberg 3.0s vs Lewis 4.0
Remember MA even through your thick skull, numbers don't lie!
When is Cheatberg going to win any race fair and square?
Have to say that looked very suspicious.....
Is Hamilton getting his positioning in the pit box wrong as alluded to by Mark Webber, to me it just looked like slow releases.
Another glaring stat:
Lewis Hamilton 2 vs 0 dnfs Cheatberg
Another stat:
Lewis always uses less fuel than Rosberg, that is ALWAYS! Rosberg is on a higher engine mode than Lewis, otherwise in at least one race Cheatberg should use less fuel!
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 4 minutes ago
Is Hamilton getting his positioning in the pit box wrong as alluded to by Mark Webber, to me it just looked like slow releases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same treatment he got from McLaren, I guess Webber knows a thing about being treated unfairly and hence he raised the issue in a slightly veiled manner. You know its F1 politics galore!
comment by truthhurts (U19586)
posted 41 minutes ago
Looks like our beloved Wolve just had his usual chat with Lowe, to give Lewis the usual dose of dismal pitstops!
1st pitstop Cheatberg 2.9s vs Lewis 3.5
2nd pitstop Cheatberg 3.0s vs Lewis 4.0
Remember MA even through your thick skull, numbers don't lie!
When is Cheatberg going to win any race fair and square?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeh merc and wolff are deliberately sabotaging a driver that they are paying 60 million samoleons --
----- what other little gems have you masterminded for us
comment by truthhurts (U19586)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Another glaring stat:
Lewis Hamilton 2 vs 0 dnfs Cheatberg
Another stat:
Lewis always uses less fuel than Rosberg, that is ALWAYS! Rosberg is on a higher engine mode than Lewis, otherwise in at least one race Cheatberg should use less fuel!
__________________________________________
He does not use less fuel then Rosberg. Rosberg just puts less fuel into his car so its not as heavy for the race
Whilst I'm not signing up to all this conspiracy fun I will say that Hamilton DOES use less fuel that Rosberg in races. The simple kg's used graphic tells us that
Rosberg uses more fuel than Hamilton and gas dine at nearly every race this year except for Hamilton's DNFs, FACT.
I REALLY HATE auto correcting and predictive text...
Saying that I should preview and read before posting.
For 'gas dine', read 'has done'
truthhurts (U19586)
You Sir are not right in the head.
He does not use less fuel then Rosberg. Rosberg just puts less fuel into his car so its not as heavy for the race
-----
Do you have any evidence that supports this theory?
The fuel is also measured in percentages so even if he is fueled less, he's still using more fuel per lap percentage wise.
Sometimes I wonder about some of the posters here. The OP is a special case but a couple of posters here must be on the wind up as the comments made are beyond ridiculous
Hamilton drove excellently today and turned poor quali into a great result. Articles like this truth hurts are designed to suit your agenda of turning people against Hamilton.
Amazing that he lost 1.5 seconds in the pitstops. If Nico had lost the same time, Hamilton would have won the race from 9th place. Very impressive driving. Indeed.
I'm surprised the poster who has not figured out how to make his name visible, is not making excuses for Hamilton after making excuses for Vettel last week for losing out in the pits, by a whole 0.066 seconds.
Where is the consistency?
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 39 minutes ago
Hamilton drove excellently today and turned poor quali into a great result. Articles like this truth hurts are designed to suit your agenda of turning people against Hamilton.
Amazing that he lost 1.5 seconds in the pitstops. If Nico had lost the same time, Hamilton would have won the race from 9th place. Very impressive driving. Indeed.
I'm surprised the poster who has not figured out how to make his name visible, is not making excuses for Hamilton after making excuses for Vettel last week for losing out in the pits, by a whole 0.066 seconds.
Where is the consistency?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was it great driving from hamilton ?
--- the fact is hamilton was behind rosberg for 30 laps after the final pitstop and did not have the pace to trouble rosberg -
Yes, from 9th place to second and losing 1.5 seconds in the pits to finishing roughly 1.5 seconds behind the winner is an excellent drive.
Considering he was managing a variety of issues the whole race. There is not a lot of time that can be made on such a short lap but he did put pressure on Rosberg.
Anyone suggesting otherwise is just being dishonest
You can't imply MA is being dishonest. The most honest and knowledgeable poster here. Never a bad word to say about anyone. And not only that he can put together a coherent argument with copious amounts proof to back it up. He listens to and respects other people's points of view, unlike some here who just copy and paste whole posts, with a childish idiotic comment at the end. Oh and he is capable of answering a simple yes or now question.
And anyone who says otherwise should apologise to him right now.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 20 hours, 10 minutes ago
Yes, from 9th place to second and losing 1.5 seconds in the pits to finishing roughly 1.5 seconds behind the winner is an excellent drive.
Considering he was managing a variety of issues the whole race. There is not a lot of time that can be made on such a short lap but he did put pressure on Rosberg.
Anyone suggesting otherwise is just being dishonest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are missing the point manx -- and i am not trying to be unduly unfair on lewis ,
fair play to him the pack opened up nicely for him at the start and with the aid of poor strategy from williams he was eventually behind rosberg -
i was just surprised he did not have the actual speed to challenge rosberg for 30 laps despite the slightly slow pit stop that was probably his fault anyway
--- seriously i was genuinely surprised that rosberg who i dont rate that highly anyway had his number for 30 odd laps and was able to counter lewis every time he got close to DRS range -
i seriously thought lewis would have been a little quicker than he was manx --
Yes, the slow pitstops were Hamilton's fault as he had to get out of the car to change his tyres and adjust his wing.
man devil
no need to get all vanessa about your little hero manx -- he admitted on sky he may have to look at how he positions his car during a pit stop there was also a suggestion that his reaction times when the jacks came off after a change were not as sharp as rosbergs
--------- hence the very slight time difference -
i must admit in all honesty i was surprised rosberg had hamilton in his back pocket for 30 odd laps , expected a bit more from lewis ---
Getting all Vanessa? What does that mean? You think he will criticise his team in public?
Watch the pitstops again
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 35 minutes ago
Getting all Vanessa? What does that mean? You think he will criticise his team in public?
Watch the pitstops again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
actually manx i dont know what it means -
----- it just sounded good when i said it
Sign in if you want to comment
Cheatberg and his Wolff
Page 1 of 2
posted on 21/6/14
Cheatberg again sets his fastest lap by exceeding the track limits, seems like I have to retract my statement about eagle eyed stewards, these fools are as blind as bats!
posted on 21/6/14
You sad that you're bum boy is struggling in the best car on the grid lol
posted on 21/6/14
Cheatberg tried to get lovey dovey with Massa at the post qualifying interview, but Massa told him to F-off right in the glare of the media
posted on 22/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 22/6/14
Looks like our beloved Wolve just had his usual chat with Lowe, to give Lewis the usual dose of dismal pitstops!
1st pitstop Cheatberg 2.9s vs Lewis 3.5
2nd pitstop Cheatberg 3.0s vs Lewis 4.0
Remember MA even through your thick skull, numbers don't lie!
When is Cheatberg going to win any race fair and square?
posted on 22/6/14
Have to say that looked very suspicious.....
posted on 22/6/14
Is Hamilton getting his positioning in the pit box wrong as alluded to by Mark Webber, to me it just looked like slow releases.
posted on 22/6/14
Another glaring stat:
Lewis Hamilton 2 vs 0 dnfs Cheatberg
Another stat:
Lewis always uses less fuel than Rosberg, that is ALWAYS! Rosberg is on a higher engine mode than Lewis, otherwise in at least one race Cheatberg should use less fuel!
posted on 22/6/14
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 4 minutes ago
Is Hamilton getting his positioning in the pit box wrong as alluded to by Mark Webber, to me it just looked like slow releases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Same treatment he got from McLaren, I guess Webber knows a thing about being treated unfairly and hence he raised the issue in a slightly veiled manner. You know its F1 politics galore!
posted on 22/6/14
comment by truthhurts (U19586)
posted 41 minutes ago
Looks like our beloved Wolve just had his usual chat with Lowe, to give Lewis the usual dose of dismal pitstops!
1st pitstop Cheatberg 2.9s vs Lewis 3.5
2nd pitstop Cheatberg 3.0s vs Lewis 4.0
Remember MA even through your thick skull, numbers don't lie!
When is Cheatberg going to win any race fair and square?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeh merc and wolff are deliberately sabotaging a driver that they are paying 60 million samoleons --
----- what other little gems have you masterminded for us
posted on 22/6/14
comment by truthhurts (U19586)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
Another glaring stat:
Lewis Hamilton 2 vs 0 dnfs Cheatberg
Another stat:
Lewis always uses less fuel than Rosberg, that is ALWAYS! Rosberg is on a higher engine mode than Lewis, otherwise in at least one race Cheatberg should use less fuel!
__________________________________________
He does not use less fuel then Rosberg. Rosberg just puts less fuel into his car so its not as heavy for the race
posted on 22/6/14
Whilst I'm not signing up to all this conspiracy fun I will say that Hamilton DOES use less fuel that Rosberg in races. The simple kg's used graphic tells us that
posted on 22/6/14
Rosberg uses more fuel than Hamilton and gas dine at nearly every race this year except for Hamilton's DNFs, FACT.
posted on 22/6/14
I REALLY HATE auto correcting and predictive text...
Saying that I should preview and read before posting.
For 'gas dine', read 'has done'
posted on 22/6/14
truthhurts (U19586)
You Sir are not right in the head.
posted on 22/6/14
He does not use less fuel then Rosberg. Rosberg just puts less fuel into his car so its not as heavy for the race
-----
Do you have any evidence that supports this theory?
The fuel is also measured in percentages so even if he is fueled less, he's still using more fuel per lap percentage wise.
Sometimes I wonder about some of the posters here. The OP is a special case but a couple of posters here must be on the wind up as the comments made are beyond ridiculous
posted on 22/6/14
Hamilton drove excellently today and turned poor quali into a great result. Articles like this truth hurts are designed to suit your agenda of turning people against Hamilton.
Amazing that he lost 1.5 seconds in the pitstops. If Nico had lost the same time, Hamilton would have won the race from 9th place. Very impressive driving. Indeed.
I'm surprised the poster who has not figured out how to make his name visible, is not making excuses for Hamilton after making excuses for Vettel last week for losing out in the pits, by a whole 0.066 seconds.
Where is the consistency?
posted on 22/6/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 39 minutes ago
Hamilton drove excellently today and turned poor quali into a great result. Articles like this truth hurts are designed to suit your agenda of turning people against Hamilton.
Amazing that he lost 1.5 seconds in the pitstops. If Nico had lost the same time, Hamilton would have won the race from 9th place. Very impressive driving. Indeed.
I'm surprised the poster who has not figured out how to make his name visible, is not making excuses for Hamilton after making excuses for Vettel last week for losing out in the pits, by a whole 0.066 seconds.
Where is the consistency?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was it great driving from hamilton ?
--- the fact is hamilton was behind rosberg for 30 laps after the final pitstop and did not have the pace to trouble rosberg -
posted on 22/6/14
Yes, from 9th place to second and losing 1.5 seconds in the pits to finishing roughly 1.5 seconds behind the winner is an excellent drive.
Considering he was managing a variety of issues the whole race. There is not a lot of time that can be made on such a short lap but he did put pressure on Rosberg.
Anyone suggesting otherwise is just being dishonest
posted on 23/6/14
You can't imply MA is being dishonest. The most honest and knowledgeable poster here. Never a bad word to say about anyone. And not only that he can put together a coherent argument with copious amounts proof to back it up. He listens to and respects other people's points of view, unlike some here who just copy and paste whole posts, with a childish idiotic comment at the end. Oh and he is capable of answering a simple yes or now question.
And anyone who says otherwise should apologise to him right now.
posted on 23/6/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 20 hours, 10 minutes ago
Yes, from 9th place to second and losing 1.5 seconds in the pits to finishing roughly 1.5 seconds behind the winner is an excellent drive.
Considering he was managing a variety of issues the whole race. There is not a lot of time that can be made on such a short lap but he did put pressure on Rosberg.
Anyone suggesting otherwise is just being dishonest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are missing the point manx -- and i am not trying to be unduly unfair on lewis ,
fair play to him the pack opened up nicely for him at the start and with the aid of poor strategy from williams he was eventually behind rosberg -
i was just surprised he did not have the actual speed to challenge rosberg for 30 laps despite the slightly slow pit stop that was probably his fault anyway
--- seriously i was genuinely surprised that rosberg who i dont rate that highly anyway had his number for 30 odd laps and was able to counter lewis every time he got close to DRS range -
i seriously thought lewis would have been a little quicker than he was manx --
posted on 23/6/14
Yes, the slow pitstops were Hamilton's fault as he had to get out of the car to change his tyres and adjust his wing.
posted on 23/6/14
man devil
no need to get all vanessa about your little hero manx -- he admitted on sky he may have to look at how he positions his car during a pit stop there was also a suggestion that his reaction times when the jacks came off after a change were not as sharp as rosbergs
--------- hence the very slight time difference -
i must admit in all honesty i was surprised rosberg had hamilton in his back pocket for 30 odd laps , expected a bit more from lewis ---
posted on 23/6/14
Getting all Vanessa? What does that mean? You think he will criticise his team in public?
Watch the pitstops again
posted on 23/6/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 35 minutes ago
Getting all Vanessa? What does that mean? You think he will criticise his team in public?
Watch the pitstops again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
actually manx i dont know what it means -
----- it just sounded good when i said it
Page 1 of 2