perhaps Fifa should make suarez wear a nozzle in the future whenever he plays football
Sorry to join this thread so late and possibly duplicate what has already been said, but instead of LFC playing the victims and fighting this case, they should take a leaf out of Chelsea's book over the Mutu affair, which would be to protect the name of the club where possible, boot out the player and the sue THE PLAYER for financial loss on the the basis of gross misconduct. There is no court in the land that would not find Suarez guilty.
If LFC want to gain instant respect for all their recent failings (protecting racism etc) it would be to accept responsibility, admit that the player is a disgrace, and get rid of the liability once and for all - and move on.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
(protecting racism etc)
============================
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Weren't Chelsea themselves the ones who outed Mutu? Remember reading that he had also fallen out with Mourinho and some Chelsea staff.
Desperate, desperate football club
Pathetic pathetic poster ^
Liverpool are a pathetic football club.
good side on the pitch, but off the pitch they are just a global laughing stock and have been for some time now
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Mutu's treatment by Chelsea was disgraceful
the bloke needed help and they tried to destroy his life and career
For a global laughing stock we still seem to market ourselves very well & pull of great sponsorship deals.
Yes, we're clearly that funny that the interest we generate were ever we go around the globe is so huge.
How do we do it? Pathetic aren't we.
Pathetic how we also seemed the most watchable club last season.
Think we made £100,000,000 from TV revenue alone, the most of any club in the league.
People were tuning in in their millions to watch games like, err, I don't know Spurs 0 Liverpool 5.
You made 1 million more than us, in tv money.
You made 1 million more than us, in tv money.
=====================================
As I said, more than any other team in the league.
You also said 100 million, that's incorrect.
Did I ?
Oh well, never mind eh.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
They should be more concerned with why they are paying £10m too much for Adam Lallana
They should be more concerned with why they are paying £10m too much for Adam Lallana
=====================================
Should be more concerned ?
Your club spent £100,000,000 to finish 7th, didn't stop you from waffling on about Liverpool for most of last season.
English players price tags are one of the reason the national team isn't performing, you have to pay to much for them.
scousers are still here chomping away
southampton are about to totally mug you all off for lallana
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
He does have a point about the money spent at spurs.
Sign in if you want to comment
Laughable Liverpool to Take Legal Action?
Page 4 of 5
posted on 27/6/14
perhaps Fifa should make suarez wear a nozzle in the future whenever he plays football
posted on 27/6/14
Sorry to join this thread so late and possibly duplicate what has already been said, but instead of LFC playing the victims and fighting this case, they should take a leaf out of Chelsea's book over the Mutu affair, which would be to protect the name of the club where possible, boot out the player and the sue THE PLAYER for financial loss on the the basis of gross misconduct. There is no court in the land that would not find Suarez guilty.
If LFC want to gain instant respect for all their recent failings (protecting racism etc) it would be to accept responsibility, admit that the player is a disgrace, and get rid of the liability once and for all - and move on.
posted on 27/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/6/14
(protecting racism etc)
============================
posted on 27/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/6/14
Weren't Chelsea themselves the ones who outed Mutu? Remember reading that he had also fallen out with Mourinho and some Chelsea staff.
posted on 27/6/14
Desperate, desperate football club
posted on 27/6/14
Pathetic pathetic poster ^
posted on 27/6/14
Liverpool are a pathetic football club.
good side on the pitch, but off the pitch they are just a global laughing stock and have been for some time now
posted on 27/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/6/14
Mutu's treatment by Chelsea was disgraceful
the bloke needed help and they tried to destroy his life and career
posted on 27/6/14
For a global laughing stock we still seem to market ourselves very well & pull of great sponsorship deals.
Yes, we're clearly that funny that the interest we generate were ever we go around the globe is so huge.
How do we do it? Pathetic aren't we.
posted on 27/6/14
* where
posted on 27/6/14
Pathetic how we also seemed the most watchable club last season.
Think we made £100,000,000 from TV revenue alone, the most of any club in the league.
People were tuning in in their millions to watch games like, err, I don't know Spurs 0 Liverpool 5.
posted on 27/6/14
You made 1 million more than us, in tv money.
posted on 27/6/14
You made 1 million more than us, in tv money.
=====================================
As I said, more than any other team in the league.
posted on 27/6/14
You also said 100 million, that's incorrect.
posted on 27/6/14
Did I ?
Oh well, never mind eh.
posted on 27/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/6/14
They should be more concerned with why they are paying £10m too much for Adam Lallana
posted on 27/6/14
They should be more concerned with why they are paying £10m too much for Adam Lallana
=====================================
Should be more concerned ?
Your club spent £100,000,000 to finish 7th, didn't stop you from waffling on about Liverpool for most of last season.
posted on 27/6/14
English players price tags are one of the reason the national team isn't performing, you have to pay to much for them.
posted on 27/6/14
scousers are still here chomping away
southampton are about to totally mug you all off for lallana
posted on 27/6/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 27/6/14
He does have a point about the money spent at spurs.
Page 4 of 5