Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I thought Hamelot trolls died out with the old 606?

comment by Captain Ron Codpiece - On the mooooooooonnnnnnn!!! (U19217)
posted 13 minutes ago
I thought Hamelot trolls died out with the old 606?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no ---- they are still alive and kicking all be it there natural habitat was nuked when the bbc 606 went belly up
--- long live the infatuated hammy half wit club i say , twas the lifeblood of the old bbc606 --

"I thought Hamelot trolls died out with the old 606?"

You ever read a BBC "Have Your Say" on F1? Some frighteningly deranged characters there, many of whom have multiple accounts to up-vote their own deluded rantings. I do wonder what they're like in real life, as they spend far too long on there to be simple internet trolls.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Whilst I do not agree with truthhurts, I've noticed that none of you have debated the points raised or even discuussed the impact.

All you do is bash hamilton or his fans. Your hatred for hamilton is as insane as the love thehamelots have for him

comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 3 minutes ago
Whilst I do not agree with truthhurts, I've noticed that none of you have debated the points raised or even discuussed the impact.

All you do is bash hamilton or his fans. Your hatred for hamilton is as insane as the love thehamelots have for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------

what do you expect us to say when somebody creates a topic that only paints the part of the picture that he wants us to see --

Every article paints a part of a picture

Aye, but common courtesy isn't to paint with your own excrement.

comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 minute ago
Every article paints a part of a picture
----------------------------------------------------------------------

exactly -- so some of us paint the other part so everybody knows who"s who and what what"s no matter what the subject matter of the topic is -

comment by Drunken Hobo (U7360)
posted 1 minute ago
Aye, but common courtesy isn't to paint with your own excrement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fluck me thats a good one hobo -

i will have to put that down in the martial artist book of funny one liners

comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 22 minutes ago
Whilst I do not agree with truthhurts, I've noticed that none of you have debated the points raised or even discuussed the impact.

All you do is bash hamilton or his fans. Your hatred for hamilton is as insane as the love thehamelots have for him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TruthHurts was quoting remarks made by someone else. Truth's point was that he thought that Nico Rosberg was “living on the edge of a bad race”. Perhaps he is. Both Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg need to win the next 3 races.

As for not receiving a penalty for overtaking under red flag, I think the following explains the reasoning.

Over a minute after the red flag was displayed, car 6 overtook car 26 under red flags
at Turn 15. Having reviewed data from several cars in the same area of the track,
several angles of video and having spoken to the driver concerned, the Stewards
determined that: the driver of car 6 had driven the lap fully within the regulations and
was traveling at a safe and reasonable speed throughout; that at the moment of the
overtake, car 26 pulled fully off line and slowed to as low as 38kph in what appeared to
be a very unusual manner, in an area of the track that was visibly completely clear; and
that the driver of car 6 took reasonable avoiding action of a car, that the Stewards
accept he reasonably believed to be in difficulty, consistent with Art. 40.8(h) of the
Sporting Regulations relating to Safety Car periods, whereby a pass is allowed in what
has to be considered an acceptable circumstance; that the driver of car 6 slowed down
to as low as 39kph immediately having passed car 26, reasonably reacting to the
situation and continued to proceed with extreme caution.

comment by Drunken Hobo (U7360)
posted 28 minutes ago
Aye, but common courtesy isn't to paint with your own excrement.
--

Good one, perhaps you should take your own advice

Drunken Hobo, how do you know and can you prove the validity of this comment "many of whom have multiple accounts to up-vote their own deluded rantings"?

comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 2 minutes ago
Drunken Hobo, how do you know and can you prove the validity of this comment "many of whom have multiple accounts to up-vote their own deluded rantings"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be perhaps more helpful if he posted a link to the forum he was criticising.

Personally, I would be most interested in examining the views.

Drunken Hobo has a reputation for posting things that are untrue and then refusing to back up his claims with any substance.

So don't hold your breath for any link.

Doesn't take a genius to figure it out. Some of them can make a post and within a few seconds they have a +7 rating on their comment, making it the highest-rated.
A few have them have also been banned for it in the past, but of course just use one of their alternate accounts to keep posting...

I'm not the only one to have spotted it either, as they aren't exactly subtle. Somebody said to me once that it was an exploit with the Facebook log in, but I don't understand that. It happens on other HYS articles too, so it's not just deluded Hamilton fanboys that are up to it.

""Drunken Hobo has a reputation for posting things that are untrue and then refusing to back up his claims with any substance.""
Precisely why I filtered him long ago, although to be honest the name gives it all away really. Still, at least you can get rid of the idiots around here, I came in unsigned having altered my computer settings recently.... the DRIVEL I saw!! Reminded how right I am to filter the trolls. Now have a re-assuring list of filter bars across the page and can read only the intelligent stuff. Great posts.

comment by Pacific Ocean Blue (U3037)
posted 11 minutes ago
""Drunken Hobo has a reputation for posting things that are untrue and then refusing to back up his claims with any substance.""
Precisely why I filtered him long ago, although to be honest the name gives it all away really. Still, at least you can get rid of the idiots around here, I came in unsigned having altered my computer settings recently.... the DRIVEL I saw!! Reminded how right I am to filter the trolls. Now have a re-assuring list of filter bars across the page and can read only the intelligent stuff. Great posts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

roughly translated i take it that load of old bollox translates into anybody that has a different opinion than you of little lewey puts a bug up your anatomy and you are to scared to debate with them

Again I was proven right, Rosberg has been living on the 'edge of a bad race'. Eventually he ran out of luck. As they say, form is temporary but class is permanent!

Yes you were truthhurts, now, I think it's time for your medication.

MA, this was wasted on POB "roughly translated i take it that load of old bollox translates into anybody that has a different opinion than you of little lewey puts a bug up your anatomy and you are to scared to debate with them" as it would appear as filtered to him.

How can you debate with someone who refuses to change a point of view even when provided with evidence to the contrary?

It's pointless