WTCBU's supposed hateful comment;
"comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted on 30/12/13
Michael Schumacher is one of the greatest F1 drivers.
The only problem I had with him was that he did not have any respect for any other driver that competed with him. And I don't blame him.
Mika Hakkinen was the only driver that challenged Michael Schumacher but he then ran behind a tree and cried his eyes out. Something that Michael Schumacher would never have done.
Sebastian Vettel does not wind up people on this forum. He simply is not good enough. The few individuals that pretend to like him just irritate with their obvious lack of knowledge.
The forum fool (MA) has spent years posting about his personal hatred of Michael Schumacher, despising him for the same reasons that in 2013 the forum fool
(MA) claimed that he admired Sebastian Vettel. What a hypocrite.
Tonight Michael Schumacher is in a coma. Felipe Massa recovered from his coma. An event that the The forum fool (MA) dismissed as a “biff on the head” from a “bed spring”.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/210826"
He called you out for the way you dismissed Massa's head injury and now you are trying to lie.
Why tell lies, martial?
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 minute ago
WTCBU's supposed hateful comment;
"comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted on 30/12/13
Michael Schumacher is one of the greatest F1 drivers.
The only problem I had with him was that he did not have any respect for any other driver that competed with him. And I don't blame him.
Mika Hakkinen was the only driver that challenged Michael Schumacher but he then ran behind a tree and cried his eyes out. Something that Michael Schumacher would never have done.
Sebastian Vettel does not wind up people on this forum. He simply is not good enough. The few individuals that pretend to like him just irritate with their obvious lack of knowledge.
The forum fool (MA) has spent years posting about his personal hatred of Michael Schumacher, despising him for the same reasons that in 2013 the forum fool
(MA) claimed that he admired Sebastian Vettel. What a hypocrite.
Tonight Michael Schumacher is in a coma. Felipe Massa recovered from his coma. An event that the The forum fool (MA) dismissed as a “biff on the head” from a “bed spring”.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/210826"
He called you out for the way you dismissed Massa's head injury and now you are trying to lie.
Why tell lies, martial?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you found the quote i am talking about -
cant you seriously see how vile it was to attack , insult , and provoke other members on a thread that was dedicated to a driver in a coma that was dying when everybody else was talking about micheal and his situation
you can apologise anytime you like for calling me a liar -
No it was not anything like that. He called you and others out for posting rubbish about Schumacher. He also exposed your stupid article making light of Massa's accident.
I do not think you know what the meaning of vile is. For example, calling a racing driver a little black boy is vile.
I also would not play the provoke or insult card, my good man
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 5 seconds ago
No it was not anything like that. He called you and others out for posting rubbish about Schumacher. He also exposed your stupid article making light of Massa's accident.
I do not think you know what the meaning of vile is. For example, calling a racing driver a little black boy is vile.
I also would not play the provoke or insult card, my good man
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant you seriously see how vile it was to use a topic that was devoted to a driver in a coma and dying , to use that topic to purposely insult and abuse other forum members whilst everybody else that posted on the topic was expressing there utmost sympathy with micheal dire situation -
--------- are you seriously saying as an adult mature male of 34 yrs old you cannot see how utterly vile that is
i await your apology for calling me a liar -- -
If you actually read the thread, you will see how the debate started and see why he made the comment. There was nothing wrong with what he said. At least he did not make light of a near death experience like you did about Massa's accident.
Your mock outrage is not only false but laughable. You are a liar, you provoke arguments, insult others and are very dishonest. Your racist comments about Hamilton were also vile and disgusting.
Terying to make out you are an innocent victim is as laughable as your views about Monaco being low downforce, dogs on leases, Mercedes losing its power advantage and squirming when asked whether a wing flexed or not.
You add no value to this forum and you need to stop telling lies about people.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 minute ago
If you actually read the thread, you will see how the debate started and see why he made the comment. There was nothing wrong with what he said. At least he did not make light of a near death experience like you did about Massa's accident.
Your mock outrage is not only false but laughable. You are a liar, you provoke arguments, insult others and are very dishonest. Your racist comments about Hamilton were also vile and disgusting.
Terying to make out you are an innocent victim is as laughable as your views about Monaco being low downforce, dogs on leases, Mercedes losing its power advantage and squirming when asked whether a wing flexed or not.
You add no value to this forum and you need to stop telling lies about people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
incredible -- you dont even have the guts to apologise when you are wrong so you just change the subject -
so you condone and agree with people using a topic about a dying man in a coma , purposely using that topic to attack and insult other forum members without the slightest provocation from anybody in the topic -
are you saying you actually condone such vile behaviour when everybody was getting along and was united in there grief and sympathy towards micheal
i still await your apology for calling me a liar ---
There was no vile behaviour, you were being called out for the disparaging comments made about Schumacher and Massa.
You are lying again, there was a debate about Vettel on the thread and people were not getting along.
I do not apologise for speaking the truth, stop telling lies.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 16 seconds ago
There was no vile behaviour, you were being called out for the disparaging comments made about Schumacher and Massa.
You are lying again, there was a debate about Vettel on the thread and people were not getting along.
I do not apologise for speaking the truth, stop telling lies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the difference is any reasonable person with an ounce decency does not use a a thread about a dying man in a coma to launch an unprovoked attack of insults against a fellow member - notice the word unprovoked -
cant you seriously see how disgusting and vile it is to use a thread about a dying man to continue a vendetta against a fellow member -
------ are you seriously saying as an adult family man you cannot see how disgusting that actually is --
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
In response to MA's invitation to debate F1 I posed a simple question regarding the downforce level at Monaco. A question that is so simple that only a person that has no interest or knowledge of F1 would try to avoid answering.
Now look at the lengths he has gone to in desperately avoiding answering that simple question.
So logically we can only conclude that he has no genuine interest or knowledge of F1.
Case proven. Case closed.
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 50 seconds ago
In response to MA's invitation to debate F1 I posed a simple question regarding the downforce level at Monaco. A question that is so simple that only a person that has no interest or knowledge of F1 would try to avoid answering.
Now look at the lengths he has gone to in desperately avoiding answering that simple question.
So logically we can only conclude that he has no genuine interest or knowledge of F1.
Case proven. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
that is not debate , that is merely an infantile question to cover up the fact you are terrified to debate with me on an adult level on this forum -
i took you apart on the old bbc 606 forum and on the not 606 forum so now you just run away from me on here like the coward you are asking me the same infantile question -
---------- unfilter me , grow a spine , come on my topics and debate like a man with me instead of keep running away from me on here -
-------- STOP BEING SUCH A SPINELESS COWARD
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have already posted the proof my good man. You are lying, again. Grow a spine and back your mouth up
We seem to be going round in illogical circles which of course is illogical.
So I will attempt to resolve the problem by relying on LOGIC.
MA quite politely invited me to engage with the true spirit of an F1 forum by inviting me to post something that was F1 related.
Logically, I logically responded to his kind and sensible invitation by logically posting a logical question to a fellow understander of logic in the following manner;
What is the level of downforce used at Monaco?
Seemed quite reasonable, logical and on topic to me.
Instead of using logic and answering my logic question in a logical way, MA then decided, for some reason best known to himself, to logically ignore the question that he invited me to ask and then take exception to a post I made on another thread where I referred to him as a “Fool”
The post that I made that he is upset about was where I pointed out that MA had publicly stated that an F1 drivers coma was caused by “a little biff on the head from an oversized bed spring”
Logically he will not deny that the accuracy of my statement regarding the “little biff” comment as I correctly quoted his view and I gave a link to his post where he stated it.
So logically, his complaint is solely related to my description of him, on that thread as a fool, is offensive.
So the terms “Gutless”, Coward”, “Geriatric”, “Baboon” “Drunken”, “Liar” are acceptable and MA has used them to insult every single member of this forum that disagreed with him.
On reflection, my description of MA on that thread as being a fool is clearly inaccurate. I should have more accurately described him as an hypocritical liar.
However, LOGIC is what he is an expert on so I think he would logically agree that given the logical arguments I have posted above then the only logical conclusion that any logical person can reach is that he is a fool.
Therefore, logically, he has not been insulted.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 18 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have already posted the proof my good man. You are lying, again. Grow a spine and back your mouth up
------------------------------------------------------------------
come on manx how can you possible condone anybody using a topic about a dying man to attack and insult other forum members -
--------------- seriously manx i honestly thought you were a better person than this mate --
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 13 hours, 50 minutes ago
We seem to be going round in illogical circles which of course is illogical.
So I will attempt to resolve the problem by relying on LOGIC.
MA quite politely invited me to engage with the true spirit of an F1 forum by inviting me to post something that was F1 related.
Logically, I logically responded to his kind and sensible invitation by logically posting a logical question to a fellow understander of logic in the following manner;
What is the level of downforce used at Monaco?
Seemed quite reasonable, logical and on topic to me.
Instead of using logic and answering my logic question in a logical way, MA then decided, for some reason best known to himself, to logically ignore the question that he invited me to ask and then take exception to a post I made on another thread where I referred to him as a “Fool”
The post that I made that he is upset about was where I pointed out that MA had publicly stated that an F1 drivers coma was caused by “a little biff on the head from an oversized bed spring”
Logically he will not deny that the accuracy of my statement regarding the “little biff” comment as I correctly quoted his view and I gave a link to his post where he stated it.
So logically, his complaint is solely related to my description of him, on that thread as a fool, is offensive.
So the terms “Gutless”, Coward”, “Geriatric”, “Baboon” “Drunken”, “Liar” are acceptable and MA has used them to insult every single member of this forum that disagreed with him.
On reflection, my description of MA on that thread as being a fool is clearly inaccurate. I should have more accurately described him as an hypocritical liar.
However, LOGIC is what he is an expert on so I think he would logically agree that given the logical arguments I have posted above then the only logical conclusion that any logical person can reach is that he is a fool.
Therefore, logically, he has not been insulted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the bottom line is i took you apart on the bbc 606 and on not 606 when we did debate F1 and you could not counter my opinions so much so in the end for the last 3 yrs you are terrified to debate with me so just follow me around on here insulting me like the coward you are,
----------- now come on here is an invitation that the whole forum can read
--------------- act like a proper man with guts and unfilter me so i can debate on your topics and you can debate on mine and hence you can read everything i say when i say it and stop acting like a coward with the filter system
----------------- are you man enough to debate with me one to one , me to you , man to man , or are you going to keep running away like a coward all the time by using the filter system knowing i cant come on your topics and you cant read what i say -
----------- ------------- now man up and act like a human being with some self esteem and moral fibre and back up what you say on here without hiding behind the filter system like a pathetic coward all the time -
Martial you were mocking felipe forhis accident and have made disparaging comments about schumi. I can see why someone will attack your integrity.
Schumacher was not dying as well. The whining is a little pathetic
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Martial you were mocking felipe forhis accident and have made disparaging comments about schumi. I can see why someone will attack your integrity.
Schumacher was not dying as well. The whining is a little pathetic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok manx --- lets do this
exactly what have i ever said that is so terrible about either massa or micheal ( and be specific ) that warrants another forum member purposely using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked insults at another forum member (me) that at the time in common with every other forum member was displaying the utmost sympathy for micheal and his horribly dire set of circumstances --
Answer the Monaco question and I will unfilter you.
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 8 minutes ago
Answer the Monaco question and I will unfilter you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes monaco is a high downforce circuit as we all know -
------- now man up and keep your side of the agreement and unfilter me so we can both debate like a couple of adults on here -
------------------- are you going to do it or continue to run away from
me ?
But every forum member was not displaying anything. Your friend TUX for instance. There was nothing wrong with what wtcbu said and his timing was impeccable as it showed how hollow your comments were.
So man up and stop whining
Done.
It would have been mores sensible to have admitted your erroro a long time ago.
mores = more
erroro = error
You see we all make errors but it is best to correct them at the earliest opportunity.
You are most welcome to contribute to any of my articles.
However, if you have a point to make then make it good and make it once. Do not attempt to ruin my threads by repeatedly posting exactly the same comments over and over again. Any repetitive posts will be deleted.
If you have a good point to make then there is no reason why you would want to repeat it anyway.
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
Done.
It would have been mores sensible to have admitted your erroro a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if we all acknowledged every misplaced word ( high instead of low ) we ever said on here the forum would never have the time to talk about formula 1
---- however that does not excuse your non stop insults that you have hurled at me for the last 5 yrs on the various forums
-- and yes i have a memory like you would not believe and can remember every user name you have used on all the forums you have been on whilst you have been insulting me -
however --------------- for the sake of the forum i am prepared to forget all that and bury the hatchet with you and hopefully even when we dont agree about whatever we can dispense with the infantile garbage of the last 5 yrs and both act in a way that two adults should act -
---------- are you up for this for the sake of the forum
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 3 minutes ago
mores = more
erroro = error
You see we all make errors but it is best to correct them at the earliest opportunity.
You are most welcome to contribute to any of my articles.
However, if you have a point to make then make it good and make it once. Do not attempt to ruin my threads by repeatedly posting exactly the same comments over and over again. Any repetitive posts will be deleted.
If you have a good point to make then there is no reason why you would want to repeat it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
did not see this post as i was writing mine whilst you were posting the above -
fair enough --- i will try and tone down my combative instincts that i showed on bbc 606 , must admit the only reason i repeatedly showed the same link on some of those threads was because it was the only way to prove a point when all else was failing -
---------- but as i said if people are prepared to meet me halfway i will make an effort to contain my natural combative tendencies on here
Sign in if you want to comment
2 race threads
Page 2 of 3
posted on 12/7/14
WTCBU's supposed hateful comment;
"comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted on 30/12/13
Michael Schumacher is one of the greatest F1 drivers.
The only problem I had with him was that he did not have any respect for any other driver that competed with him. And I don't blame him.
Mika Hakkinen was the only driver that challenged Michael Schumacher but he then ran behind a tree and cried his eyes out. Something that Michael Schumacher would never have done.
Sebastian Vettel does not wind up people on this forum. He simply is not good enough. The few individuals that pretend to like him just irritate with their obvious lack of knowledge.
The forum fool (MA) has spent years posting about his personal hatred of Michael Schumacher, despising him for the same reasons that in 2013 the forum fool
(MA) claimed that he admired Sebastian Vettel. What a hypocrite.
Tonight Michael Schumacher is in a coma. Felipe Massa recovered from his coma. An event that the The forum fool (MA) dismissed as a “biff on the head” from a “bed spring”.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/210826"
He called you out for the way you dismissed Massa's head injury and now you are trying to lie.
Why tell lies, martial?
posted on 12/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 minute ago
WTCBU's supposed hateful comment;
"comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted on 30/12/13
Michael Schumacher is one of the greatest F1 drivers.
The only problem I had with him was that he did not have any respect for any other driver that competed with him. And I don't blame him.
Mika Hakkinen was the only driver that challenged Michael Schumacher but he then ran behind a tree and cried his eyes out. Something that Michael Schumacher would never have done.
Sebastian Vettel does not wind up people on this forum. He simply is not good enough. The few individuals that pretend to like him just irritate with their obvious lack of knowledge.
The forum fool (MA) has spent years posting about his personal hatred of Michael Schumacher, despising him for the same reasons that in 2013 the forum fool
(MA) claimed that he admired Sebastian Vettel. What a hypocrite.
Tonight Michael Schumacher is in a coma. Felipe Massa recovered from his coma. An event that the The forum fool (MA) dismissed as a “biff on the head” from a “bed spring”.
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/210826"
He called you out for the way you dismissed Massa's head injury and now you are trying to lie.
Why tell lies, martial?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you found the quote i am talking about -
cant you seriously see how vile it was to attack , insult , and provoke other members on a thread that was dedicated to a driver in a coma that was dying when everybody else was talking about micheal and his situation
you can apologise anytime you like for calling me a liar -
posted on 12/7/14
No it was not anything like that. He called you and others out for posting rubbish about Schumacher. He also exposed your stupid article making light of Massa's accident.
I do not think you know what the meaning of vile is. For example, calling a racing driver a little black boy is vile.
I also would not play the provoke or insult card, my good man
posted on 12/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 5 seconds ago
No it was not anything like that. He called you and others out for posting rubbish about Schumacher. He also exposed your stupid article making light of Massa's accident.
I do not think you know what the meaning of vile is. For example, calling a racing driver a little black boy is vile.
I also would not play the provoke or insult card, my good man
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cant you seriously see how vile it was to use a topic that was devoted to a driver in a coma and dying , to use that topic to purposely insult and abuse other forum members whilst everybody else that posted on the topic was expressing there utmost sympathy with micheal dire situation -
--------- are you seriously saying as an adult mature male of 34 yrs old you cannot see how utterly vile that is
i await your apology for calling me a liar -- -
posted on 12/7/14
If you actually read the thread, you will see how the debate started and see why he made the comment. There was nothing wrong with what he said. At least he did not make light of a near death experience like you did about Massa's accident.
Your mock outrage is not only false but laughable. You are a liar, you provoke arguments, insult others and are very dishonest. Your racist comments about Hamilton were also vile and disgusting.
Terying to make out you are an innocent victim is as laughable as your views about Monaco being low downforce, dogs on leases, Mercedes losing its power advantage and squirming when asked whether a wing flexed or not.
You add no value to this forum and you need to stop telling lies about people.
posted on 12/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 minute ago
If you actually read the thread, you will see how the debate started and see why he made the comment. There was nothing wrong with what he said. At least he did not make light of a near death experience like you did about Massa's accident.
Your mock outrage is not only false but laughable. You are a liar, you provoke arguments, insult others and are very dishonest. Your racist comments about Hamilton were also vile and disgusting.
Terying to make out you are an innocent victim is as laughable as your views about Monaco being low downforce, dogs on leases, Mercedes losing its power advantage and squirming when asked whether a wing flexed or not.
You add no value to this forum and you need to stop telling lies about people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
incredible -- you dont even have the guts to apologise when you are wrong so you just change the subject -
so you condone and agree with people using a topic about a dying man in a coma , purposely using that topic to attack and insult other forum members without the slightest provocation from anybody in the topic -
are you saying you actually condone such vile behaviour when everybody was getting along and was united in there grief and sympathy towards micheal
i still await your apology for calling me a liar ---
posted on 12/7/14
There was no vile behaviour, you were being called out for the disparaging comments made about Schumacher and Massa.
You are lying again, there was a debate about Vettel on the thread and people were not getting along.
I do not apologise for speaking the truth, stop telling lies.
posted on 12/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 16 seconds ago
There was no vile behaviour, you were being called out for the disparaging comments made about Schumacher and Massa.
You are lying again, there was a debate about Vettel on the thread and people were not getting along.
I do not apologise for speaking the truth, stop telling lies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the difference is any reasonable person with an ounce decency does not use a a thread about a dying man in a coma to launch an unprovoked attack of insults against a fellow member - notice the word unprovoked -
cant you seriously see how disgusting and vile it is to use a thread about a dying man to continue a vendetta against a fellow member -
------ are you seriously saying as an adult family man you cannot see how disgusting that actually is --
posted on 12/7/14
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
posted on 12/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
posted on 12/7/14
In response to MA's invitation to debate F1 I posed a simple question regarding the downforce level at Monaco. A question that is so simple that only a person that has no interest or knowledge of F1 would try to avoid answering.
Now look at the lengths he has gone to in desperately avoiding answering that simple question.
So logically we can only conclude that he has no genuine interest or knowledge of F1.
Case proven. Case closed.
posted on 12/7/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 50 seconds ago
In response to MA's invitation to debate F1 I posed a simple question regarding the downforce level at Monaco. A question that is so simple that only a person that has no interest or knowledge of F1 would try to avoid answering.
Now look at the lengths he has gone to in desperately avoiding answering that simple question.
So logically we can only conclude that he has no genuine interest or knowledge of F1.
Case proven. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
that is not debate , that is merely an infantile question to cover up the fact you are terrified to debate with me on an adult level on this forum -
i took you apart on the old bbc 606 forum and on the not 606 forum so now you just run away from me on here like the coward you are asking me the same infantile question -
---------- unfilter me , grow a spine , come on my topics and debate like a man with me instead of keep running away from me on here -
-------- STOP BEING SUCH A SPINELESS COWARD
posted on 12/7/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have already posted the proof my good man. You are lying, again. Grow a spine and back your mouth up
posted on 12/7/14
We seem to be going round in illogical circles which of course is illogical.
So I will attempt to resolve the problem by relying on LOGIC.
MA quite politely invited me to engage with the true spirit of an F1 forum by inviting me to post something that was F1 related.
Logically, I logically responded to his kind and sensible invitation by logically posting a logical question to a fellow understander of logic in the following manner;
What is the level of downforce used at Monaco?
Seemed quite reasonable, logical and on topic to me.
Instead of using logic and answering my logic question in a logical way, MA then decided, for some reason best known to himself, to logically ignore the question that he invited me to ask and then take exception to a post I made on another thread where I referred to him as a “Fool”
The post that I made that he is upset about was where I pointed out that MA had publicly stated that an F1 drivers coma was caused by “a little biff on the head from an oversized bed spring”
Logically he will not deny that the accuracy of my statement regarding the “little biff” comment as I correctly quoted his view and I gave a link to his post where he stated it.
So logically, his complaint is solely related to my description of him, on that thread as a fool, is offensive.
So the terms “Gutless”, Coward”, “Geriatric”, “Baboon” “Drunken”, “Liar” are acceptable and MA has used them to insult every single member of this forum that disagreed with him.
On reflection, my description of MA on that thread as being a fool is clearly inaccurate. I should have more accurately described him as an hypocritical liar.
However, LOGIC is what he is an expert on so I think he would logically agree that given the logical arguments I have posted above then the only logical conclusion that any logical person can reach is that he is a fool.
Therefore, logically, he has not been insulted.
posted on 13/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 18 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why are you whining martial. Are you a 5 year old?
Was it disgusting to make fun of Massa's accident?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you started this as you always do and as usual i have to prove you wrong -
why call people liars on here if you cant back it up with any proof -
how can you possibly condone a forum member using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked bile and insults against fellow members because that is exactly what you are doing manx --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have already posted the proof my good man. You are lying, again. Grow a spine and back your mouth up
------------------------------------------------------------------
come on manx how can you possible condone anybody using a topic about a dying man to attack and insult other forum members -
--------------- seriously manx i honestly thought you were a better person than this mate --
posted on 13/7/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 13 hours, 50 minutes ago
We seem to be going round in illogical circles which of course is illogical.
So I will attempt to resolve the problem by relying on LOGIC.
MA quite politely invited me to engage with the true spirit of an F1 forum by inviting me to post something that was F1 related.
Logically, I logically responded to his kind and sensible invitation by logically posting a logical question to a fellow understander of logic in the following manner;
What is the level of downforce used at Monaco?
Seemed quite reasonable, logical and on topic to me.
Instead of using logic and answering my logic question in a logical way, MA then decided, for some reason best known to himself, to logically ignore the question that he invited me to ask and then take exception to a post I made on another thread where I referred to him as a “Fool”
The post that I made that he is upset about was where I pointed out that MA had publicly stated that an F1 drivers coma was caused by “a little biff on the head from an oversized bed spring”
Logically he will not deny that the accuracy of my statement regarding the “little biff” comment as I correctly quoted his view and I gave a link to his post where he stated it.
So logically, his complaint is solely related to my description of him, on that thread as a fool, is offensive.
So the terms “Gutless”, Coward”, “Geriatric”, “Baboon” “Drunken”, “Liar” are acceptable and MA has used them to insult every single member of this forum that disagreed with him.
On reflection, my description of MA on that thread as being a fool is clearly inaccurate. I should have more accurately described him as an hypocritical liar.
However, LOGIC is what he is an expert on so I think he would logically agree that given the logical arguments I have posted above then the only logical conclusion that any logical person can reach is that he is a fool.
Therefore, logically, he has not been insulted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the bottom line is i took you apart on the bbc 606 and on not 606 when we did debate F1 and you could not counter my opinions so much so in the end for the last 3 yrs you are terrified to debate with me so just follow me around on here insulting me like the coward you are,
----------- now come on here is an invitation that the whole forum can read
--------------- act like a proper man with guts and unfilter me so i can debate on your topics and you can debate on mine and hence you can read everything i say when i say it and stop acting like a coward with the filter system
----------------- are you man enough to debate with me one to one , me to you , man to man , or are you going to keep running away like a coward all the time by using the filter system knowing i cant come on your topics and you cant read what i say -
----------- ------------- now man up and act like a human being with some self esteem and moral fibre and back up what you say on here without hiding behind the filter system like a pathetic coward all the time -
posted on 13/7/14
Martial you were mocking felipe forhis accident and have made disparaging comments about schumi. I can see why someone will attack your integrity.
Schumacher was not dying as well. The whining is a little pathetic
posted on 13/7/14
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
Martial you were mocking felipe forhis accident and have made disparaging comments about schumi. I can see why someone will attack your integrity.
Schumacher was not dying as well. The whining is a little pathetic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok manx --- lets do this
exactly what have i ever said that is so terrible about either massa or micheal ( and be specific ) that warrants another forum member purposely using a topic about a dying man in a coma to hurl unprovoked insults at another forum member (me) that at the time in common with every other forum member was displaying the utmost sympathy for micheal and his horribly dire set of circumstances --
posted on 13/7/14
Answer the Monaco question and I will unfilter you.
posted on 13/7/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 8 minutes ago
Answer the Monaco question and I will unfilter you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes monaco is a high downforce circuit as we all know -
------- now man up and keep your side of the agreement and unfilter me so we can both debate like a couple of adults on here -
------------------- are you going to do it or continue to run away from
me ?
posted on 13/7/14
But every forum member was not displaying anything. Your friend TUX for instance. There was nothing wrong with what wtcbu said and his timing was impeccable as it showed how hollow your comments were.
So man up and stop whining
posted on 13/7/14
Done.
It would have been mores sensible to have admitted your erroro a long time ago.
posted on 13/7/14
mores = more
erroro = error
You see we all make errors but it is best to correct them at the earliest opportunity.
You are most welcome to contribute to any of my articles.
However, if you have a point to make then make it good and make it once. Do not attempt to ruin my threads by repeatedly posting exactly the same comments over and over again. Any repetitive posts will be deleted.
If you have a good point to make then there is no reason why you would want to repeat it anyway.
posted on 13/7/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
Done.
It would have been mores sensible to have admitted your erroro a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if we all acknowledged every misplaced word ( high instead of low ) we ever said on here the forum would never have the time to talk about formula 1
---- however that does not excuse your non stop insults that you have hurled at me for the last 5 yrs on the various forums
-- and yes i have a memory like you would not believe and can remember every user name you have used on all the forums you have been on whilst you have been insulting me -
however --------------- for the sake of the forum i am prepared to forget all that and bury the hatchet with you and hopefully even when we dont agree about whatever we can dispense with the infantile garbage of the last 5 yrs and both act in a way that two adults should act -
---------- are you up for this for the sake of the forum
posted on 13/7/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 3 minutes ago
mores = more
erroro = error
You see we all make errors but it is best to correct them at the earliest opportunity.
You are most welcome to contribute to any of my articles.
However, if you have a point to make then make it good and make it once. Do not attempt to ruin my threads by repeatedly posting exactly the same comments over and over again. Any repetitive posts will be deleted.
If you have a good point to make then there is no reason why you would want to repeat it anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
did not see this post as i was writing mine whilst you were posting the above -
fair enough --- i will try and tone down my combative instincts that i showed on bbc 606 , must admit the only reason i repeatedly showed the same link on some of those threads was because it was the only way to prove a point when all else was failing -
---------- but as i said if people are prepared to meet me halfway i will make an effort to contain my natural combative tendencies on here
Page 2 of 3