Cheers Admin 1

I have to pop out on wife pleasing duties, so play nicely

Here, here.

I wholeheartedly agree

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I gave you one star because this very article seems to be biased towards the drearies. I agree with the gist of what you're saying but you pick on one side.

OOPs I'm sorry , seems like I misread!

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

best bet is,

delete abusive or put down comments, people will soon get message.

Generally those that are losing the debate resort to name calling and abuse. There is no need for it
Just wish the culprits would get a ban on here

I found the comment about cheeries thinking they are superior funny. There's a faction on here who think they know better than every board member that's run through ER over last decade. Even more so since MC arrived. They epitomize superiority complex. Each to their own. I find those posters funny also.

As for abuse on here, Koppite was the only real abusive poster. And he went back to the old BBC days.
He came over to ja, and run amok. He's gone. Blue was great for stirring things up. And abusing the English language. Now he's on YEP site. Never found Clive abusive. But, he's gone.

So, for me, the only abuse is LIW's constant harping
On about some of us having our collective heads in the sand because we dare put a little faith in an owner we collectively feel is doing some good. That and his own stylistic abuse of the English language. But that's funny also. And long may it continue. Along with LIW's great knack for coming up with gems like this:
Ken Cellino - genius and yet more in the funny department.

Calling ppl names, when the targets dish it out is no different to a hard tackler having to get some rough treatment back. It rough banter, but banter none the less.

Now when stuff gets too personal, ala families brought in and slated, THATS OFFSIDE.

This article does seem aligned with the dreary perspective, but the msg is fair.

The poster needs to realise that not606,12 yards all exist! Add to that then fact that there have been bannings and that old doozy of folk going permanently offline.

This is a a thriving site, we have the most passionate posters from the old Bbc site. When u have a board full of strong characters, u will always get conflict.

When u get the above + an off season + a change in club dynamics, u get what u are seeing now.

Two tribes syndrome.

True Mike

Daft thing is, if MC comes good as some of us hope,
All Leeds fans will be able to smile and relish it.

If MC fails, the only ones smiling (and harping on about it) will be those dead against him right now.

C'est la vie.

I'm no fan of Cellino. The jury's out, but I still want him to succeed. Failure would be too much to take. I won't be smiling.

just cause some people don't trust mc doesnt mean that they will be smiling if it goes wrong.

Its a cheap trick to suggest it.

And anyone who complains about people being passive aggressive but uses a term like dreary has not really got a leg to stand on

Matty, some will. And you know it.

who?

Name names

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Jonty will have a quiet smile.
Tortoise might well be setting off fireworks on top.

Matty, how is calling someone a dreary passive aggressive?

Also how is calling someone a dreary any different to calling them a chearie.

Its also not a cheap trick but a reality. If u go back and look at a certain posters article, u will see articles, links and comments detailing "I told u so`s".

Can u honestly say that these folk won't take pleasure in delivering bad news should things fail!?

cause dreary is an indirectly hostile term used in a hostile manner to try and belittle the opinions of those who dont agree with you

when did I say there was a differernce?

and as one of the people mentioned as "taking pleasure" in his club falling apart and getting relegated has already said that he hopes he is wrong about mc in the long run then yeah I would say its a cheap trick.

Its a cheap trick cause its meant to try and belittle a persons stand point.

Oh you dont think MC is any good for the club...yeah well thats because you hate the club and want it to fail.

Its a circular child like argument.

If MC fails, the only ones smiling (and harping on about it) will be those dead against him right now.
............................................

Batty, I can't believe that you're implying ANY Leeds fan will smile at the possibility of more misfortune being heaped on the club. I know you're better than that, and you know we're all wanting a successful future for the club.

Really Matty? Dreary in the 606 context is 100% in your face and direct.

R.e your second paragraph, when he posts negative news HABITIALLY, and seldom offers positive news, the statement about being wrong bears no weight when of comes to credibility.

That's the base of it mate.

Seems like on here, unless u are a pessimist, u will see ur articles on positivity one starred mysteriously.

Jamie, he isnt saying that, what henis saying is certain posters report bad news on mass, over scrutinize blood news and post links of "how they called it". This behaviour clearly indicates that the posters involved WANT to be proven right, even if its at the clubs expense.

MattyP, you are one that does the name calling.
On too of that you know my life story, or you think you do
Try to stick to the debate rather than tell me I don't go to ER