or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 3108 comments are related to an article called:

Brendan

Page 98 of 125

posted on 13/2/15

Mocking scousers?
I thought there were no scousers on here
And even then there's like three or four of us to like twenty of you! Lol
This is is the place where every LFC interview or match or even comments from fans is like dropping bread crumbs in a pond of starved little fish. I kid you not I am only here to watch the spectacle. That's what this has become, a 'spectacle'. We all know this is the truth but you are all too legit to quit now as you would look weak sons, real weak See what I did there?

Its great to see this scramble over our club. Good impact on rivals. There's a wum, then there is this obsessed delusionist thing going on here. Totally separate concepts but that being said I very much prefer the current sort of laid back attitude from admins across the site and if asked I would say to let this take its natural course. I'm curious to see how far or long it can go. We could be here for years!

posted on 13/2/15

"I kid you not I am only here to watch the spectacle."



You're in the staring role sunshine

posted on 13/2/15

"Good impact on rivals"

You're not our rivals

posted on 13/2/15

Superlative's and hyperbole. The food of the scousers.

posted on 13/2/15

Hazzard's signed
Sterling?

posted on 13/2/15

"I very much prefer the current sort of laid back attitude from admins across the site"

More posters banned from the Liverpool board than all the other boards combined
I'm sure they are laid back, shame about you lot

posted on 13/2/15

We don't ask for board bans on here.
That would spoil threads like these.
And all our fun.
We're smarter than you
And that's an insult to us

posted on 13/2/15

The Photo Show

posted on 13/2/15

Morning

posted on 13/2/15

Morning Crap WW

posted on 13/2/15

Morning

posted on 13/2/15

comment by Photo *TheWhiteWall* (U17633)
posted 10 minutes ago
We don't ask for board bans on here.
That would spoil threads like these.
And all our fun.
We're smarter than you
And that's an insult to us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you're speaking for Chelsea fans who haven't been on this thread, as you lot are certainly not smarter. Delusion

posted on 13/2/15

Seven posts on the trot WW. And every one bôllocks. A fine achievement even by your standards

posted on 13/2/15

You said you'd be back

posted on 13/2/15

comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Photo *TheWhiteWall* (U17633)
posted 10 minutes ago
We don't ask for board bans on here.
That would spoil threads like these.
And all our fun.
We're smarter than you
And that's an insult to us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you're speaking for Chelsea fans who haven't been on this thread, as you lot are certainly not smarter. Delusion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You ban us from your board, so come looking for us on ours

posted on 13/2/15

comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 day, 11 hours ago
comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 23 minutes ago
Complaint text : "pointless article form a 5 year ol bitter...delete "

I'm gather Chelsea fans weren't interested in the article on the Chelsea board. Was probably a bit pant wetty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet there's an article on the Chelsea board posted with the sole purpose of mocking Brendan Rodgers, which is full of childish comments from posters of several clubs. The op is now systematically deleting comments that don't mock Rodgers.

Why do you deem an article by the most immature poster on the site, TCP, worthy of being allowed to accrue thousands of comments, when it clearly offers nothing to the site?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the Chelsea fans probably enjoy it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Brilliant

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 13/2/15

That comment from admin that said more people are banned from the Liverpool board, than every other biard combined

posted on 13/2/15

Why are they here though on this thread if they detest TCP, WW and Arouna so much. Why havent they filtered them?

posted on 13/2/15

Cue the "Oh we're just here to make you look stupid" replies. No it just makes you look silly for whinging about the above mentioned posters so much but still flocking to their threads. You cant help yourself

posted on 13/2/15

comment by Ruiney Reckers (U1005)
posted 7 seconds ago
That comment from admin that said more people are banned from the Liverpool board, than every other biard combined
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You miss out the bits were Admin stated that people were banned because they were ruining the Liverpool board, and also the site. The Admins were trying to build up the site and said on numerous occasions they were concerned that the wums invading our board would put normal people off joining. So basically, you lot were endangering the existence of the site. Good effort

posted on 13/2/15

comment by Photo *TheWhiteWall* (U17633)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 1 day, 11 hours ago
comment by terminator1 (U1863)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 23 minutes ago
Complaint text : "pointless article form a 5 year ol bitter...delete "

I'm gather Chelsea fans weren't interested in the article on the Chelsea board. Was probably a bit pant wetty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet there's an article on the Chelsea board posted with the sole purpose of mocking Brendan Rodgers, which is full of childish comments from posters of several clubs. The op is now systematically deleting comments that don't mock Rodgers.

Why do you deem an article by the most immature poster on the site, TCP, worthy of being allowed to accrue thousands of comments, when it clearly offers nothing to the site?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the Chelsea fans probably enjoy it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Brilliant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my, you're too thick to realise what he meant. It's like a dumb parent that lets his child draw on the walls, saying they let them do it 'because they're enjoying themselves......

I see you didn't include the quote saying that this kind of article is not what the Admins had in mind when creating the site....

posted on 13/2/15

comment by Mr Chelsea ✪ (U3579)
posted 6 minutes ago
Why are they here though on this thread if they detest TCP, WW and Arouna so much. Why havent they filtered them?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I carry on in the hope that one day they'll wake up one day and realise how dumb they are being. I know it's a long shot, but you never know...... And I don't like filtering, it can ruin the flow of a thread if comments are missing, and WW and Arouna do post the occasional constructive comment. You'll notice I didn't include TCP there - lost cause I'm afraid

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 13/2/15

Boohoo, you don't think the United board got relentless stick last season? We didn't cry and threaten to leave the site unless everyone was banned.

posted on 13/2/15

I carry on in the hope that one day they'll wake up one day

-------------------------------------------------

How many days we on about here?

posted on 13/2/15

Boohoo, you don't think the United board got relentless stick last season?

--------------------------------------------------

Yes but we are made of hard stuff, whereas the scousers are made of réet 'ard stuff, you know what I'm saying?

Page 98 of 125