cancan - Have you ever been to London? It is one of the best cities in the world. Liverpool is a top city but it has nothing on London. Fabregas has a house in London and Chelsea are title favourites. We have the money but we are only back in Europe not constantly there.
We have to be realistic
Circumstances my friend. Fab was surplus to requirements at Barca whereas Southampton would have much preferred to keep Lallana. Add in the fact that he is English.
I would say the profile of a typical good Liverpool signing is one who's on the up and really hungry for success.
I don't dispute Fabregas is a great player but he's just left the team he said he always wanted to play for and previous to that from a team he said he loved and would never ever play for Chelsea out of respect for.
Basically Fabregas is on the downgrade at huge wages and it remains to be seen if his heart is really in it.
Lallana has so much to offer on lower wages and at this stage is totally comitted to LFC. That is the player we are looking for IMO.
ARE , i agree . looking forward to seeing him play
Jesus wept have we forgotten that Fabregas is playing against Burnley tonight, people going on as if it's Real Madrid or something.
Evaluate at the end of the season
pretty simple hey
You can tell people have been hungry for the return of the premier league football.
Pass of the season has already been handed out, and world class credentials are already being attributed.
If Fabregas, who is a very good footballer, was as good as is being touted, he wouldn't be playing against Burnley for Chelsea, but preparing to start the season with Barca.
As I said, good player, but premature ejaculations all over Sky Sports, as hyperbole runs rife.
Chelsea do look strong though, and have quality all over the pitch.
As for comparisons between Lallana and Fabregas, lets give Lallana a chance to kick a ball or two in a red shirt before we start decrying his purchase, in favour of somebody else.
comment by 1manontherun (U4291)
posted 1 hour ago
How do you understand when your Article is titled 'I dont understand'??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂😂😭
Fabregas on over £100k more than Lallana per week..
His worth is then £30m+ more than Lallana over a five year deal.
Pass of the season has already been handed out
------------------
Henderson to Sterling Sunday!
Lallana will be a top purchase, can play box to box, attacking midfield, or in the wide positions.
He's a utility player, and will do a job for us
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
Fabregas on over £100k more than Lallana per week..
His worth is then £30m+ more than Lallana over a five year deal.
====
What you mean to say is, on this occasion I choose to believe what is printed in the press
So Chelsea are not known for paying high wages?
Fool!
Sturridge £12m
Lukaku £28m
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 33 minutes ago
retardicle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think I prefer that to sharticle
comment by Keep It Greasey (U1396)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 33 minutes ago
retardicle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think I prefer that to sharticle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
retardicle.......
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
So Chelsea are not known for paying high wages?
Fool!
Sturridge £12m
Lukaku £28m
====
So you don't know what either are paid
Coleman £60,000 transfer
Johnson £120,000 a week wage
Fool
Yeah you never know they could be on similar wages, right Fella? Desperate.
Think the OP has missed something. Of we could have got Fabregas, I'm sure we would have. We can only get players who want to play for us.
comment by Mamba - Here's one for you to suck on - Real Sosobad (U1282) (U13041)
posted 50 minutes ago
Yeah you never know they could be on similar wages, right Fella? Desperate.
====
Could always look at the transfer fee for Johnson if you want.
We could say £12.5
But you were owed £7m already by Portsmouth
Sign in if you want to comment
i just dont understand
Page 2 of 2
posted on 18/8/14
cancan - Have you ever been to London? It is one of the best cities in the world. Liverpool is a top city but it has nothing on London. Fabregas has a house in London and Chelsea are title favourites. We have the money but we are only back in Europe not constantly there.
We have to be realistic
posted on 18/8/14
Circumstances my friend. Fab was surplus to requirements at Barca whereas Southampton would have much preferred to keep Lallana. Add in the fact that he is English.
posted on 18/8/14
I would say the profile of a typical good Liverpool signing is one who's on the up and really hungry for success.
I don't dispute Fabregas is a great player but he's just left the team he said he always wanted to play for and previous to that from a team he said he loved and would never ever play for Chelsea out of respect for.
Basically Fabregas is on the downgrade at huge wages and it remains to be seen if his heart is really in it.
Lallana has so much to offer on lower wages and at this stage is totally comitted to LFC. That is the player we are looking for IMO.
posted on 18/8/14
ARE , i agree . looking forward to seeing him play
posted on 18/8/14
Jesus wept have we forgotten that Fabregas is playing against Burnley tonight, people going on as if it's Real Madrid or something.
posted on 18/8/14
Evaluate at the end of the season
pretty simple hey
posted on 18/8/14
Penîs
posted on 18/8/14
Is that you MarktheMad?
posted on 18/8/14
You can tell people have been hungry for the return of the premier league football.
Pass of the season has already been handed out, and world class credentials are already being attributed.
If Fabregas, who is a very good footballer, was as good as is being touted, he wouldn't be playing against Burnley for Chelsea, but preparing to start the season with Barca.
As I said, good player, but premature ejaculations all over Sky Sports, as hyperbole runs rife.
Chelsea do look strong though, and have quality all over the pitch.
As for comparisons between Lallana and Fabregas, lets give Lallana a chance to kick a ball or two in a red shirt before we start decrying his purchase, in favour of somebody else.
posted on 18/8/14
MarktheMad
posted on 18/8/14
comment by 1manontherun (U4291)
posted 1 hour ago
How do you understand when your Article is titled 'I dont understand'??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂😂😂😭
posted on 19/8/14
Fabregas on over £100k more than Lallana per week..
His worth is then £30m+ more than Lallana over a five year deal.
posted on 19/8/14
Pass of the season has already been handed out
------------------
Henderson to Sterling Sunday!
posted on 19/8/14
Lallana will be a top purchase, can play box to box, attacking midfield, or in the wide positions.
He's a utility player, and will do a job for us
posted on 19/8/14
retardicle
posted on 19/8/14
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
Fabregas on over £100k more than Lallana per week..
His worth is then £30m+ more than Lallana over a five year deal.
====
What you mean to say is, on this occasion I choose to believe what is printed in the press
posted on 19/8/14
So Chelsea are not known for paying high wages?
Fool!
Sturridge £12m
Lukaku £28m
posted on 19/8/14
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 33 minutes ago
retardicle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think I prefer that to sharticle
posted on 19/8/14
comment by Keep It Greasey (U1396)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 33 minutes ago
retardicle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think I prefer that to sharticle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
retardicle.......
posted on 19/8/14
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
So Chelsea are not known for paying high wages?
Fool!
Sturridge £12m
Lukaku £28m
====
So you don't know what either are paid
Coleman £60,000 transfer
Johnson £120,000 a week wage
Fool
posted on 19/8/14
Yeah you never know they could be on similar wages, right Fella? Desperate.
posted on 19/8/14
Think the OP has missed something. Of we could have got Fabregas, I'm sure we would have. We can only get players who want to play for us.
posted on 19/8/14
comment by Mamba - Here's one for you to suck on - Real Sosobad (U1282) (U13041)
posted 50 minutes ago
Yeah you never know they could be on similar wages, right Fella? Desperate.
====
Could always look at the transfer fee for Johnson if you want.
We could say £12.5
But you were owed £7m already by Portsmouth
Page 2 of 2