Won't work to well on a website which is designed to accommodate conflicting views.
Similar sought of thing on Sky Sports though.
I've always thought this'd be a good idea. Might turn into a bit of a farce on here though.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Rusky (U15847)
posted 6 minutes ago
Won't work to well on a website which is designed to accommodate conflicting views.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this
no point really
Surely you could post to state you think a good or bad point has been made????
comment by Reddevils double (U12215)
posted 14 seconds ago
Surely you could post to state you think a good or bad point has been made????
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
True but I would just like to skip through to the comments with high or low ratings and avoiding the between trife about Duncs mrs' huge bewbs and generic comment about Jays sexuallity.
Rooney was one of the best of a horrifically bad bunch. By his usual standards he was average, or poor even.
I thought Jones was better lol.
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
comment by CEF - One hundred and twenty seven points is still possible!!! (U3090)
posted 3 seconds ago
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Sometimes you can like a comment or article without having anything to add.
The solution to your problem would be to remove the anonymity of the voting system.
Yeh I was gonna say, that won't really solve anything. But removing the anonymity will at least show the biased to be who they are.
I've always thought an option to edit your comment would be good. For a couple of minutes after posting.
Please god no, let this not turn into a kindergarten. It already is, but a voting system will turn this into a ret.arded kindergarten
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I have bad eye sight too.
A Green arrow and a Red arrow would be sufficient.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by #Forza (U19575)
posted 4 minutes ago
no red arrow, just green
people need 2 learn 2b nicer 2 each other on hear
-----------------
Feck you
no red arrow, just green
-----------------
Actually not a bad idea. Only have an option to vote positive.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by CEF - One hundred and twenty seven points is still possible!!! (U3090)
posted 3 seconds ago
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Sometimes you can like a comment or article without having anything to add.
The solution to your problem would be to remove the anonymity of the voting system.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, a Facebook style liking system would be good.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Comments voting
Page 1 of 1
posted on 25/8/14
Won't work to well on a website which is designed to accommodate conflicting views.
posted on 25/8/14
Similar sought of thing on Sky Sports though.
posted on 25/8/14
I've always thought this'd be a good idea. Might turn into a bit of a farce on here though.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
comment by Rusky (U15847)
posted 6 minutes ago
Won't work to well on a website which is designed to accommodate conflicting views.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this
no point really
posted on 25/8/14
Surely you could post to state you think a good or bad point has been made????
posted on 25/8/14
<stars>
posted on 25/8/14
comment by Reddevils double (U12215)
posted 14 seconds ago
Surely you could post to state you think a good or bad point has been made????
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
True but I would just like to skip through to the comments with high or low ratings and avoiding the between trife about Duncs mrs' huge bewbs and generic comment about Jays sexuallity.
posted on 25/8/14
Rooney was one of the best of a horrifically bad bunch. By his usual standards he was average, or poor even.
posted on 25/8/14
Wrong thread, sorry
posted on 25/8/14
I thought Jones was better lol.
posted on 25/8/14
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
posted on 25/8/14
comment by CEF - One hundred and twenty seven points is still possible!!! (U3090)
posted 3 seconds ago
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Sometimes you can like a comment or article without having anything to add.
The solution to your problem would be to remove the anonymity of the voting system.
posted on 25/8/14
Yeh I was gonna say, that won't really solve anything. But removing the anonymity will at least show the biased to be who they are.
posted on 25/8/14
I've always thought an option to edit your comment would be good. For a couple of minutes after posting.
posted on 25/8/14
Please god no, let this not turn into a kindergarten. It already is, but a voting system will turn this into a ret.arded kindergarten
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
I have bad eye sight too.
posted on 25/8/14
A Green arrow and a Red arrow would be sufficient.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
comment by #Forza (U19575)
posted 4 minutes ago
no red arrow, just green
people need 2 learn 2b nicer 2 each other on hear
-----------------
Feck you
posted on 25/8/14
no red arrow, just green
-----------------
Actually not a bad idea. Only have an option to vote positive.
posted on 25/8/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 25/8/14
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by CEF - One hundred and twenty seven points is still possible!!! (U3090)
posted 3 seconds ago
The whole article rating system on here is seriously flawed. I've been onto Admins many times about this.
It is wrong that people can rate an article without commenting first. I fücking hate 1 star bandits - cowards!!!
Comment liking would be good, but again only after a person has commented themselves first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Sometimes you can like a comment or article without having anything to add.
The solution to your problem would be to remove the anonymity of the voting system.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, a Facebook style liking system would be good.
Page 1 of 1