So you'd rather have players who've come from League 1 rather than the Champion's League?
You forget Halfman they only signed players from Barca, Real and Milan.............didn't they? And what player from your team would i want at the min?
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
How can you decide you don't want any of our players in your team when you've not seen them play?
I heard your match on WM Saturday and that put me off!!!!
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
Well Ideye couldn't score past Oxford so............Gamboa played in Norway was it? and if Valera was so good why did Porto let him go?
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can confirm that they fall into the shîte catorgory
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I heard your match on WM Saturday and that put me off!!!!
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
Well Ideye couldn't score past Oxford so............Gamboa played in Norway was it? and if Valera was so good why did Porto let him go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using your logic that means Falcao isn't any good. Otherwise, why would Monaco let him go? You can't have it both ways! As for Gamboa, Wilfred Bony only play in the Belgium league but look at him now! WOW, Ideye didn't score against Oxford. How about rating him based on more than one game you jeb end!
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolves went top after three games the year they were relegated. How about we judge them after more than three games you jeb end?
Besides, that doesn't explain your poor performances against Sunderland and Southampton. Or even your capitulation against a Swansea team who realistically will finish no higher than mid table.
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out
Southampton have been very impressive this year, we kept them to nowt, and got a good point the majority of the premiership (bar top4) would be satisfied with
So either you lying and you didn't watch our games so have no idea how we played...
Or your a secret Baggie watching our games instead of your own?
Who said they watched your games ?
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolves went top after three games the year they were relegated. How about we judge them after more than three games you jeb end?
Besides, that doesn't explain your poor performances against Sunderland and Southampton. Or even your capitulation against a Swansea team who realistically will finish no higher than mid table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I judge Wolves start to the season. I merely pointed out that you've beaten ONE decent team. Get you facts straight!
Please explain what was so poor about our performances against Sunderland (a game I was at) and Southampton (a good away point)?
Anyway ....I'm out of here !
Hate coming on the baggies board, make me feel all crabby !
comment by Halfmanhalfwolf (U11570)
posted 1 minute ago
Who said they watched your games ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?!
How dyou know how we played then silly dogheads
Wolves have had a good start and have managed to field their best 11 so far.
Albion have had an average start but with more than a few players that won't figure too much once our new signings are up-and-running.
It's way to early for serious wumming.
Like I said previous, Wolves displaying their default trait of 'speaking too soon'.
I rest my case m'lud...
Wolves should go up, the championship is shockingly poor and apparently there team is quality
Then Wet bum should finish in the champions leagues places with all the champions league players you signed
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?! = you lost 3-0 so how did you play? did we need to watch?
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out = didn't your lad dive to get a peno?
Like I said previous, Wolves displaying their default trait of 'speaking too soon'.
Why? Where did one fan say we were going to win the league can you show me? I said we are playing amazing footie right now and expect us to finish in the top 8 and i would be very happy with that!!!
Wolves are looking good tbf to them. They're playing some nice football, by all accounts and have some young talented players amongst their ranks. KJ is also a solid manager, as he shown in his time with Millwall.
I think Wolves are on course for a good season and a top half finish. I don't think the quite have the squad depth to mount a challenge but that's no shame and a top half finish for a newly promoted League 1 club...is a good achievement.
As for us,
I believe we have some brilliant new additions and one of our strongest squads to date. Whether the head coach can find his best squad, the right formation and better tactical awareness, I'm unsure.
Time will tell.
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 35 minutes ago
Then Wet bum should finish in the champions leagues places with all the champions league players you signed
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?! = you lost 3-0 so how did you play? did we need to watch?
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out = didn't your lad dive to get a peno?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No but we did have a perfectly good goal disallowed. Either way, we played well. I was there!
comment by JH (U18654)
posted 6 minutes ago
Wolves are looking good tbf to them. They're playing some nice football, by all accounts and have some young talented players amongst their ranks. KJ is also a solid manager, as he shown in his time with Millwall.
I think Wolves are on course for a good season and a top half finish. I don't think the quite have the squad depth to mount a challenge but that's no shame and a top half finish for a newly promoted League 1 club...is a good achievement.
As for us,
I believe we have some brilliant new additions and one of our strongest squads to date. Whether the head coach can find his best squad, the right formation and better tactical awareness, I'm unsure.
Time will tell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair comment JH. We've got the squad. Can Father Ted get the best out of them once they're all fit?!
Nobody said they had seen the shît play hoofball
Somebody (can't remember who) said they had listened to the sit game on WM
Please read before making a of yourself
Many thanks
Sign in if you want to comment
ELEVEN!!!
Page 2 of 4
posted on 3/9/14
So you'd rather have players who've come from League 1 rather than the Champion's League?
You forget Halfman they only signed players from Barca, Real and Milan.............didn't they? And what player from your team would i want at the min?
posted on 3/9/14
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
How can you decide you don't want any of our players in your team when you've not seen them play?
posted on 3/9/14
I heard your match on WM Saturday and that put me off!!!!
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
Well Ideye couldn't score past Oxford so............Gamboa played in Norway was it? and if Valera was so good why did Porto let him go?
posted on 3/9/14
Good God..
posted on 3/9/14
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
posted on 3/9/14
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can confirm that they fall into the shîte catorgory
posted on 3/9/14
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
posted on 3/9/14
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
I heard your match on WM Saturday and that put me off!!!!
So are Gamboa, Valera and Ideye 'crocked', 'washed' or 'shiîte'?
Well Ideye couldn't score past Oxford so............Gamboa played in Norway was it? and if Valera was so good why did Porto let him go?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Using your logic that means Falcao isn't any good. Otherwise, why would Monaco let him go? You can't have it both ways! As for Gamboa, Wilfred Bony only play in the Belgium league but look at him now! WOW, Ideye didn't score against Oxford. How about rating him based on more than one game you jeb end!
posted on 3/9/14
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolves went top after three games the year they were relegated. How about we judge them after more than three games you jeb end?
Besides, that doesn't explain your poor performances against Sunderland and Southampton. Or even your capitulation against a Swansea team who realistically will finish no higher than mid table.
posted on 3/9/14
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out
Southampton have been very impressive this year, we kept them to nowt, and got a good point the majority of the premiership (bar top4) would be satisfied with
posted on 3/9/14
So either you lying and you didn't watch our games so have no idea how we played...
Or your a secret Baggie watching our games instead of your own?
posted on 3/9/14
Who said they watched your games ?
posted on 3/9/14
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Are they just looking at the results and deciding we're bad based on the fact we've only lost one game albeit to a team with a 100% record?
Weird!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't won either and have played against teams that you should be looking to beat if you were to avoid relegation. Sunderland, Southampton and Swansea are hardly world beaters, are they?
If I were a West Brom fan, I would have expected at least one win out of those three games. Fact is, you haven't looked good enough to beat any of them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Swansea have won 3 out of 3 you cretin!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolves went top after three games the year they were relegated. How about we judge them after more than three games you jeb end?
Besides, that doesn't explain your poor performances against Sunderland and Southampton. Or even your capitulation against a Swansea team who realistically will finish no higher than mid table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I judge Wolves start to the season. I merely pointed out that you've beaten ONE decent team. Get you facts straight!
Please explain what was so poor about our performances against Sunderland (a game I was at) and Southampton (a good away point)?
posted on 3/9/14
Anyway ....I'm out of here !
Hate coming on the baggies board, make me feel all crabby !
posted on 3/9/14
comment by Halfmanhalfwolf (U11570)
posted 1 minute ago
Who said they watched your games ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?!
posted on 3/9/14
How dyou know how we played then silly dogheads
posted on 3/9/14
Wolves have had a good start and have managed to field their best 11 so far.
Albion have had an average start but with more than a few players that won't figure too much once our new signings are up-and-running.
It's way to early for serious wumming.
Like I said previous, Wolves displaying their default trait of 'speaking too soon'.
I rest my case m'lud...
posted on 3/9/14
Wolves should go up, the championship is shockingly poor and apparently there team is quality
posted on 3/9/14
Then Wet bum should finish in the champions leagues places with all the champions league players you signed
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?! = you lost 3-0 so how did you play? did we need to watch?
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out = didn't your lad dive to get a peno?
posted on 3/9/14
Like I said previous, Wolves displaying their default trait of 'speaking too soon'.
Why? Where did one fan say we were going to win the league can you show me? I said we are playing amazing footie right now and expect us to finish in the top 8 and i would be very happy with that!!!
posted on 3/9/14
You really don't get it
posted on 3/9/14
Wolves are looking good tbf to them. They're playing some nice football, by all accounts and have some young talented players amongst their ranks. KJ is also a solid manager, as he shown in his time with Millwall.
I think Wolves are on course for a good season and a top half finish. I don't think the quite have the squad depth to mount a challenge but that's no shame and a top half finish for a newly promoted League 1 club...is a good achievement.
As for us,
I believe we have some brilliant new additions and one of our strongest squads to date. Whether the head coach can find his best squad, the right formation and better tactical awareness, I'm unsure.
Time will tell.
posted on 3/9/14
comment by WOLVES55 (U10973)
posted 35 minutes ago
Then Wet bum should finish in the champions leagues places with all the champions league players you signed
They claim they know how we played. Ergo, they must have watched them. Get it?! = you lost 3-0 so how did you play? did we need to watch?
The performance against Sunderland was very good, a few lapses defensively and a wonder striker nicked them a point. But to be expected with 3 defenders out = didn't your lad dive to get a peno?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No but we did have a perfectly good goal disallowed. Either way, we played well. I was there!
posted on 3/9/14
comment by JH (U18654)
posted 6 minutes ago
Wolves are looking good tbf to them. They're playing some nice football, by all accounts and have some young talented players amongst their ranks. KJ is also a solid manager, as he shown in his time with Millwall.
I think Wolves are on course for a good season and a top half finish. I don't think the quite have the squad depth to mount a challenge but that's no shame and a top half finish for a newly promoted League 1 club...is a good achievement.
As for us,
I believe we have some brilliant new additions and one of our strongest squads to date. Whether the head coach can find his best squad, the right formation and better tactical awareness, I'm unsure.
Time will tell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair comment JH. We've got the squad. Can Father Ted get the best out of them once they're all fit?!
posted on 3/9/14
Nobody said they had seen the shît play hoofball
Somebody (can't remember who) said they had listened to the sit game on WM
Please read before making a of yourself
Many thanks
Page 2 of 4