or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 44 comments are related to an article called:

Why Monaco let Falcao leave

Page 2 of 2

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

Bleed him dry?

It ain't like he'll have to get himself a council house after is it

posted on 5/9/14

Melton, that was a tongue-in-cheek comment.

posted on 5/9/14

Vik
You wana read what miss Jackson is doing to Floyd

posted on 5/9/14

Sorry rr, I just can't tell with this site at the minute!

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

Vik half of them are nasty though. His baby mama looks like filth though.

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

Floyd wont fight nelly though Know nelly will grab his head and chuck that fool through the air.

comment by Xiu (U6109)

posted on 5/9/14

If you read between the lines - Monaco failed to win anything and had to obey FFP. They got a great profit on James and Falcao has basically been begging Madrid to sign him since Christmas. Even Madrid baulked at the vast amount Falcao commanded in wages.

Falcao was also injured for half of last season and while his goals record was good, it wasn't as high as one would expect. I think Monaco did the sensible thing and got him off of their wage bill.

I think United have taken a risk in this deal. If it works, everyone will be talking about a master-stroke. however, I think it smacks of desperation.

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

posted on 5/9/14

"We had hoped that the sanctions would not be so severe and that clubs would be given a few years to adjust but it happened in a different way"
____________________

Roughly translated, this means "we thought FFP was a bit of a joke but it turns out that they are actually quite serious about it".

posted on 5/9/14

I still can't understand why an owner can't invest money into his own club for one off payments (player purchases) providing the ongoing costs (wages etc) can be covered by the annual revenue of the club
________________

I would guess to prevent salaries being paid as a one-off fee totalling four years' worth of wages.

If you allow certain types of expenditure and not others then it opens the door to all manner of commercial fiddling/cheating. It's much cleaner and simpler to ensure that clubs are self sufficient.

It isn't a perfect system but it's a start.

posted on 5/9/14

Please nelly te same size as a tank. Floyd doesn't want any.

Just like he doesn't want any with fifty cent, especially after fifty already duffed him before at a charity basketball event.

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 5/9/14

And so is fitty cent, but fifty cent still beat him up


Floyd's a boxer, not a fighter.

posted on 5/9/14

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Page 2 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment