Cheer up, we won. Let's face it, in the group, the 3 points is all that matters.

Curly....we played 5 games and to my reckoning only played well vs spurs.

Saints we were lucky and tonight we were lucky, we will get better gamr by game im sure. Just got to dig it out in the early stages of the league etc, so many injured to come back too.

Ill take poor performances if we win. Even the league apart from cfc we are wrll in it.

I bet Madrid are f'ing brickin it.

Lallana didn't have a bad game I thought. Coutinho didn't have a shocker but was just ineffective

Yeah, we weren't that bad, despite the usual suspects saying we were. It just didn't quite fall for us.

comment by Don Fabio Borini - Can Ibe Lambert? Vote Yes Scotland! (U10635)
posted 20 seconds ago
Lallana didn't have a bad game I thought. Coutinho didn't have a shocker but was just ineffective
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are joking, right?

comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, we weren't that bad, despite the usual suspects saying we were. It just didn't quite fall for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't the point to be effective??

Shocker to me says he gave the ball away in dangerous areas or didn't do a thing. Lallana is just coming back from an injury and was efficient enough

comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, we weren't that bad, despite the usual suspects saying we were. It just didn't quite fall for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't the point to be effective??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure you're quoting the right person there. I never said anything about effectiveness.

Coutinho was poor.

Broke up play, for them, first half.

Nothing second half

comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Igor Biscan's Missing Goal Celebration (U15416)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah, we weren't that bad, despite the usual suspects saying we were. It just didn't quite fall for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't the point to be effective??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure you're quoting the right person there. I never said anything about effectiveness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My bad

Coutinho was awful tbh.

comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 17 seconds ago

What anoys me is the number of crosses we seem to just punt jn now. It is like someone said moyes has possessed rodgers. Ironically the goal came frm it bit wha happened to thw quick razor sharp footy on the floor. One time we did do it today we should have scored.

and we have to serioisly think of a new keeper.

Positive note sakho had a decent game.

Thought Ballotelli was good though.

Had a good work rate.
More to come?

A few silly mistakes but them aside i thought we were class, loads if positives.

Think we need more movement up front to give options otherwise they might only have the option of crossing

We were poor.

Lucky to win that one

I agree with Lefty: we were poor. It looked like a hangover from the Villa game. Ludogorets targeted Raheem and Philipe, and they were good at it. Great to see Mario get his first goal, sad that Suso didn't get on. At the end of the day a draw would have been fair.

JimmyTheRed

calm down folks! it happens. we are bound to have bad games... we are fitting Lallana and Balotalli in to our attack and on top of that we lost Sturridge

Well, at least Brendan read my article in time to make the changes lol

I don't think you can legally criticise a player if you spell his name wrong.

comment by MaccaRuss (U18932)
posted 6 hours, 32 minutes ago
I don't think you can legally criticise a player if you spell his name wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You spelt yours wrong, it's spelt d!c.k

There is no word in the Oxford dictionary spelt d!c.k