or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 201 comments are related to an article called:

pathetic!

Page 7 of 9

posted on 24/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/8/11

Seems my writing is illegible

And my spelling atrocious

So report me to UEFA

posted on 24/8/11

Jessy... remember you wrote this...

"And how the SFA can register a player without knowing if he will get his Visa...is beyond me"


posted on 24/8/11

Being suspended would also mean he did not meet the standards or requirements also then

+++++++++

Then it would make him ineligible, because that's what the word means

But suspended does NOT mean the same.

posted on 24/8/11

"And how the SFA can register a player without knowing if he will get his Visa...is beyond me"

+++++++++

Yip...Beggars belief, considering the Spl refused to register, Bocanegra, for the same reasons

posted on 24/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/8/11

So......

Was Bocanegra suspended for Sunday's match or, ineligible to play because, he had No Visa nor work permit, so could not be registered according to Spl rules

posted on 24/8/11

"ip...Beggars belief, considering the Spl refused to register, Bocanegra, for the same reasons"

Ye whit???



Check tthis... paras 4 and 5.

http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/rangers/267476-uefa-to-rule-on-maribor-protest-over-carlos-bocanegra-eligibility/

Jessy... as well as proving you are an illiterate, you're proving you are THE single biggest phanny on JA606.

posted on 24/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/8/11

Who's talking aboot the Maribor game now, ya eejit.

We're talking aboot his ineligibility to play last Sunday

Move on, you're pushing the barrier from your normal service on these boards...but keep up the good work

posted on 24/8/11

According to you if you are ineleigible to play in domestic football you cannot play in Europe

++++++

Gie it a rest...Rule 18:14 staes that.How many times??

Just be glad he was eligible to play last Thursday under Uefa's criteriaBut he was DEFINITELY ineligible to play on Sunday, under the Spl's criteria

posted on 24/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/8/11

Curly... Jessy disnae know WHAT he is saying now.

He's so mixed up he's arguing against himself now.


He's the only Weeble I know that actually gets knocked over on a daily basis.

posted on 24/8/11

It is YOU who is saying if he was ineligible for Sundays game would have meant he was ineligible to play against Maribor, not me

+++++++

No I didn't.

You were the nitwit that brought the word " suspended " into play...I clearly stated they did not mean the same.

Away and blow yer nose...you seem congested

posted on 24/8/11

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/8/11

Jessy... have you noticed that all your fellow Dhimms are giving this thread a wide berth, and leaving you to get skelped about on your own?


Even Phil McGooeybrain is laughing at you on his Twitter page.

Pffft

posted on 24/8/11

Why are you always seeking attention!

Do you feel insecure, that back-up is required.

Most on these boards can't be erst with you

posted on 24/8/11

Jeez - are you STILL pushing this.

Boca was not ineligible for any game, simply unable to gain access to the UK to play the game.

They mean 2 completely different things.

As I mentioned earlier, Joey Barton was elligible to play in USA, but unable as he could not get a visa.

If the Motherwell game had been played in France, Boca could have played.

You are showing yourself up here - as others have said - stick yer tail between yer legs & move on.

posted on 24/8/11

curly,

Bocanegra wasn't eligible to play last Sunday, as the Spl wouldn't allow him to be registered because they consider border control regulations aa part of their requirements.

Uefa do not

posted on 24/8/11

Boca was not ineligible for any game, simply unable to gain access to the UK to play the game

+++++

He was ineligible to play lat Sunday...? As per the above comment

posted on 24/8/11

Titanic, I told you yesterday..........No case to answer.
Headlines in newspapers today confirm this, Uefa have dismissed this laughable attempt at a protest.

posted on 24/8/11

"Bocanegra wasn't eligible to play last Sunday, as the Spl wouldn't allow him to be registered because they consider border control regulations aa part of their requirements."

He was registered.

Jessy.... look at the two paragraphs I posted above... they are the exact OPPOSITE of what you state.

In fact... here... in case you can't work your scroll button...

The Scottish FA insist the relevant international transfer certificate to register Bocanegra as a Rangers player was processed by that deadline, rendering him eligible to play in Scottish competitions, despite not yet being in possession of a UK work permit.

The SFA maintain that immigration law has no bearing on whether a player is eligible to take part in their competitions and, subsequently, UEFA competition and that Bocanegra’s appearance in Slovenia was above board.

posted on 24/8/11

....people pay hundreds of pounds down in Soho to get the sorts of beating you get on here for free.


.. now.. GTF...

posted on 24/8/11

He was registered.


++++++

With Uefa...Yes

With the Spl...No


1.Bocanegra was eligible to play against Maribor, as Uefa do not consider border controls(Visas/Work permits)as requirements.

2,Bocanegra was ineligible to play against Motherwell, as the Spl DO consdier border controls(Visas/work permits) as necessary requirements.

Who's gonny argue with that

posted on 24/8/11

Ishmael, I think this blows TCD's case out the water. I can't believe he has spent two day's on this.

Page 7 of 9

Sign in if you want to comment