Ffs, have you not been on here?

Paul Paton is the one most people are suggesting was involved.

There were suggestions Fojut was involved. He wasn't.

Big Paul Nae Surrender Paton, loyal fleg waver and all round tubthumper.

Na aint been on the day

Read Smids thread from this morning mate.

So as it seems it has been discussed here any info on the why

Thanks mate will have a squiz at it , got my dinner on the now

I see the police are now treating it as a sectarian attack.

Course they are did ye no see my description of Paul Paton.

comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
I see the police are now treating it as a sectarian attack.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what did Zaluska say to kick it off?

Why would Zaluska have said anything ath?

Why so quick to blacken the victims name in all this?

Really stupid by the two if proven, given the way they have clamped down on simply social media abuse from players ,anyways am away the now

"the tim musta said summin!"

Just askin.

Circling the marching bands.

comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 7 minutes ago
I see the police are now treating it as a sectarian attack.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Source?

comment by atheist (U2783)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
I see the police are now treating it as a sectarian attack.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what did Zaluska say to kick it off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently it was a racial slur, he thought it might help him get a start

So Zaluska has now said that he was attacked from behind and didn't know who it was.

So for me what we can take from this is either

A - Zaluska has done something wrong or in fact actually provoked something and he's covering his back

Or

B - It was a cowardly attack by two footballers who clearly just wanted to do him that night.

I don't know which one to believe if I'm honest, I hope it's all out in the open sooner than later that's for sure

Another thing I would mention is whoever the two attackers were, will surely have had to tell their manager and therefore would have been suspended by the club pending an investigation.

So if the likes of Paton etc aren't playing on Saturday then it will only add to the flames

Jackie was telling the press yesterday how Paton (among others) was a role model for our players.

Telt you yesterday that zaluska started it

Jackie was telling the press yesterday how Paton (among others) was a role model for our players.

Ivan, from what I gather, this interview took place before the incident happened?

Ivan, from what I gather, this interview took place before the incident happened?
-------

Woomp Woomp

How ragin dae ye think jackie is right now.

See with your point B NNH, I'd understand it if it was someone they'd had a battle with on the park and it's carried over.

I can't see how that's the case with a subby keeper.

I thought it was him talking yesterday?

It is unlikely that he spoke on Sunday as he'd probably have been off.

It was Peter Liewell and Diddie Desmond.

They are bored of having Lennon's donkey signings on the wage bill