comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where did I say its a representation of all the Mancs?

..............

So, what is your issue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he walked right into that one

Feck me! As it turns out you are thick indeed. You pulled me up on my comment. You're the one with an issue clearly.
You didn't answer by the way. Where do I say its a representation of all Mancs?
You should further apologise for claiming my initial comment was made up when it clearly wasn't.

comment by roonited (U11635)




posted 3 minutes ago



comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
Where did I say its a representation of all the Mancs?

..............

So, what is your issue?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he walked right into that one

...........

Very easily I might add.

You pulled me up on my comment.

...............

Yes.

What is your exact issue with a Manchester United fan who said that ADM was the best player on the pitch against Chelsea.

Lets pull out the semantics/pedants lads... Means job done to me. Seriously Vidic you hoping to catch me with a fishy comment so you can focus on it and away from the little destruction job I just did on you and your mate. Thats what you get for tryna pull me up. Dont try it next time.

You are also avoiding the question I asked in the first place. Your flailing.

Well put it this way Mamba, you are not very bright. You say you meant singular, so I ask you what your point is if a singular manc thought ADM was the best player on the pitch against Chelsea.

But then you did post the link, shown below, using the word mancs.

.............
comment by Mamba - Here's one for you to suck on - Real Sosobad (U1282) (U13041)



posted 8 hours, 39 minutes ago


http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/289760

Di Maria, best player in the match vs Chelsea and best player in the LEAGUE. Madrid wanted to keep him but couldn't match his wages.

Mamba 1 - 0 Silly Mancs.

.................

So we have one link, with only one manc making the comment that has you rattled, and you proceed to say silly mancs.

You can now see how you have made a bit of a fool yourself here.

So, here is a get out for you. Explain why you have an issue with one persons comments out of many cotntrary ones, or I will take it as an admission you are a tool.

Another one bites the dust

high fiving each other wont help. I thought you were playing dumb but I guess you really dont get it. I said I had seen Mancs saying those deluded things. If I had written what you suggested you'd be having (or trying) to have a go at me for something else. Dont shoot the messenger. You are trying too hard to salvage anything from this.

high fiving each other wont help.

.............

It certainly isn't going to help you. You have been well done over.

Maybe you should think things through before making a fool of yourself, which seems to be a common trend for you on here.

Tell me, what gratification do you get out of being shown up as a prize plum?

Now as I have said before here, the only way you can save any face at all is to tell us why you have an issue with just one Manc saying something stupid?

Over to you. I will be back in just under an hour, so that will give you plenty of time to try and save face.

Yeah, right.

So, as predicted earlier, you have no answer.

Take a bow kid, you are one mighty t urd on the bottom of a tramps shoe.

Abusive even...
Trying to get me to engage in sideshows. New low Vidic.

Trying to get me to engage in sideshows.

..............

Well, no one can get you engaged in decent debate, you don't have the mental aptitude for it.

You dug yourself a deep, deep hole and when offered a way out you kept digging deeper.

You tried wumming, and came up short.

I didn't Wum. I just posted some contenders for comment of the week. Why you have your panties in a twist about it is no mystery or surprise to me.