This is so futile, but I'll humour you by breaking down your article and your response in to smaller chunks, so you can actually see how ridiculous you sound:
"I came across article man u Old Trafford side put out most costly eleven in English top tier history.
Man United fielded the most expensive starting line-up in Premier League history as they faced local rivals Man City, though this was clearly not enough to avoid defeat."
How much did City's line up cost in comparison? Hardly playing Accrington are we. It's also worth mentioning that City have had several years to establish their style of play and first 11 where as we haven't even had all season (10 games) to do that. It's also worth mentioning that football players this year cost more than they did in 10 years ago, so of course we have one of the most expensive teams
"You seem happy just because your clubs throwing around loads of money even if the players aren't worth it... I'd only take two of those players at Arsenal."
Your basing this on what? Let's take a closer look.
David de Gea: £18.9m: Worth the money - would get in to your team tomorrow
uke Shaw: £27.5m: 18 year old - Too early to tell, has hardly started 2 games due to injury etc.
Smalling: £10m Hardly breaking the bank here are we? Average price and we can get it back for him
Rojo: £16m (too early to tell but has been solid for us in the few games he's played this season.
Valencia: £16m We've had our return on valencia, winning several trophies during his prime years
Blind: £13.8m We needed a midfielder of his ilk, still too early to tell but he's been decent. Worth the money in this market.
Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team.
Now stop talking tripe
Bebe
"Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team."
----------------------------------------
Just reading these last few lines of a long, rambling and largely nonsensical comment. Jeez, you are so deluded. For a start, Rooney cost £27 and his game has considerably gone down in recent years. Even Welbeck is performing better than him this season so it's rubbish to say he would walk into Arsenal. Who would he replace? Sanchez? Di Maria is admittedly a quality player and would walk into most PL teams, but is not worth anywhere near £60m. Van Persie oh dear, he wouldn't even make the Arsenal bench. You will be lucky if Van Persie plays 20 games or score double figures a season for the rest of his career, he is totally finished even Man U fans don't want to see him. Already reports are saying he wants to go to Turkey. Who would he replace at Arsenal? In fact, Welbeck is playing better than any Man U striker, stats don't lie. There is a reason Man U are 10th and Arsenal are 4th, it's not rocket science.
Fellaini is still awful, but he looks good only because the rest of the team are rubbish.
Just wanted to know if this team is the most overpriced team and overrated
======================
Overpriced, definitely.
Overrated, I don't really think so.
I don't know anybody except deluded manu fans who rate this as anything other than an average side.
They also had £37.5m Mata on the bench
They're probably gonna end up paying £40m+ to make falcaos move permanent. Getting mugged off left right and centre
If the Falcout move is made permanent then including wages he will have cost United in excess of £100m or thereabouts.
comment by The Grand Cannon - bring back Lord Bendtner (U18697)
posted 3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Bebe
"Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team."
----------------------------------------
Just reading these last few lines of a long, rambling and largely nonsensical comment. Jeez, you are so deluded. For a start, Rooney cost £27 and his game has considerably gone down in recent years. Even Welbeck is performing better than him this season so it's rubbish to say he would walk into Arsenal. Who would he replace? Sanchez? Di Maria is admittedly a quality player and would walk into most PL teams, but is not worth anywhere near £60m. Van Persie oh dear, he wouldn't even make the Arsenal bench. You will be lucky if Van Persie plays 20 games or score double figures a season for the rest of his career, he is totally finished even Man U fans don't want to see him. Already reports are saying he wants to go to Turkey. Who would he replace at Arsenal? In fact, Welbeck is playing better than any Man U striker, stats don't lie. There is a reason Man U are 10th and Arsenal are 4th, it's not rocket science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Van Persie and Rooney would both walk into your team.
Welbeck, Sanchez, Ox, Walcott, Ozil > RVP, Rooney, Januzij, Mata, Di Maria
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
Whats painful to see is the childish squabbling.
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
------------------
Nah it's hilarious seeing a team with ambition in the market get worse after signing "worldies"
comment by El Cap. (U9537)
posted 4 minutes ago
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
------------------
Nah it's hilarious seeing a team with ambition in the market get worse after signing "worldies"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Best get your laughs in early just in case, eh?
comment by Mamba - Here's one for you to suck on - Real Sosobad (U1282) (U13041)
posted 5 hours, 4 minutes ago
If the Falcout move is made permanent then including wages he will have cost United in excess of £100m or thereabouts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know Lovren actually cost you £35m or so (assuming £50k a week wages)? What about Andy Carroll at £60m?
I genuinely can't understand why you include wages over a 5 year contract - by that logic Rooney has also cost us nearly £120m, can't you see how fúcking rétarded it is to include the wages?
Ozil actually cost Arsenal nearly £79m. In short Mamba, you're a moron.
Shaw and Fellaini were the only players starting on Sunday that were overpriced.
Jay you get really p'eed off and abusive anytime Falcout's wages are mentioned. I just mentioned the fact that you will be paying the said amount. Wasnt even addressing you. Have a word with yourself mate obviously there's something that really irks you about his wages.
Utd can spend a billion and they still wont win the league Chelsea and City will still do them in
comment by 9bit (U19964)
posted 13 hours, 55 minutes ago
Yes like we did with Ozil but I'm not boasting about spending 40m on a flop.
----------------------------------------------------------------
is Ozil a flop or not utilised in his best position. People seem to forget he was labelled the best No 10....but he is has been playing in the No 11 role.
2 games in the No 10 role this season and he got MOTM for both games.....just shows that maybe its not Ozil who is the flop but our manager (pains me to say this as I am a massive wenger fan) is the flop in his team selection................
He played almost all of last season as a no. 10, and only about 3 games this season on the left.
Sign in if you want to comment
£241 million you are having a laugh
Page 2 of 2
posted on 4/11/14
This is so futile, but I'll humour you by breaking down your article and your response in to smaller chunks, so you can actually see how ridiculous you sound:
"I came across article man u Old Trafford side put out most costly eleven in English top tier history.
Man United fielded the most expensive starting line-up in Premier League history as they faced local rivals Man City, though this was clearly not enough to avoid defeat."
How much did City's line up cost in comparison? Hardly playing Accrington are we. It's also worth mentioning that City have had several years to establish their style of play and first 11 where as we haven't even had all season (10 games) to do that. It's also worth mentioning that football players this year cost more than they did in 10 years ago, so of course we have one of the most expensive teams
"You seem happy just because your clubs throwing around loads of money even if the players aren't worth it... I'd only take two of those players at Arsenal."
Your basing this on what? Let's take a closer look.
David de Gea: £18.9m: Worth the money - would get in to your team tomorrow
uke Shaw: £27.5m: 18 year old - Too early to tell, has hardly started 2 games due to injury etc.
Smalling: £10m Hardly breaking the bank here are we? Average price and we can get it back for him
Rojo: £16m (too early to tell but has been solid for us in the few games he's played this season.
Valencia: £16m We've had our return on valencia, winning several trophies during his prime years
Blind: £13.8m We needed a midfielder of his ilk, still too early to tell but he's been decent. Worth the money in this market.
Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team.
Now stop talking tripe
posted on 4/11/14
Bebe
"Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team."
----------------------------------------
Just reading these last few lines of a long, rambling and largely nonsensical comment. Jeez, you are so deluded. For a start, Rooney cost £27 and his game has considerably gone down in recent years. Even Welbeck is performing better than him this season so it's rubbish to say he would walk into Arsenal. Who would he replace? Sanchez? Di Maria is admittedly a quality player and would walk into most PL teams, but is not worth anywhere near £60m. Van Persie oh dear, he wouldn't even make the Arsenal bench. You will be lucky if Van Persie plays 20 games or score double figures a season for the rest of his career, he is totally finished even Man U fans don't want to see him. Already reports are saying he wants to go to Turkey. Who would he replace at Arsenal? In fact, Welbeck is playing better than any Man U striker, stats don't lie. There is a reason Man U are 10th and Arsenal are 4th, it's not rocket science.
posted on 4/11/14
Fellaini is still awful, but he looks good only because the rest of the team are rubbish.
posted on 4/11/14
Just wanted to know if this team is the most overpriced team and overrated
======================
Overpriced, definitely.
Overrated, I don't really think so.
I don't know anybody except deluded manu fans who rate this as anything other than an average side.
posted on 4/11/14
They also had £37.5m Mata on the bench
They're probably gonna end up paying £40m+ to make falcaos move permanent. Getting mugged off left right and centre
posted on 4/11/14
If the Falcout move is made permanent then including wages he will have cost United in excess of £100m or thereabouts.
posted on 4/11/14
comment by The Grand Cannon - bring back Lord Bendtner (U18697)
posted 3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Bebe
"Fellaini: £27.5m Had a bad season last year, but all of our players did. This season will be the real test and he's done well so far.
Rooney: £20m - Would get in your team - won countless trophies etc etc etc bargain at 20 mil, even today.
Maria: £59.7m Would get in your team - MOTM champs league final etc etc etc far from average
Persie: £24m - won us the prem last season, did well in the world cup, going through some bad form - did and would get in your team."
----------------------------------------
Just reading these last few lines of a long, rambling and largely nonsensical comment. Jeez, you are so deluded. For a start, Rooney cost £27 and his game has considerably gone down in recent years. Even Welbeck is performing better than him this season so it's rubbish to say he would walk into Arsenal. Who would he replace? Sanchez? Di Maria is admittedly a quality player and would walk into most PL teams, but is not worth anywhere near £60m. Van Persie oh dear, he wouldn't even make the Arsenal bench. You will be lucky if Van Persie plays 20 games or score double figures a season for the rest of his career, he is totally finished even Man U fans don't want to see him. Already reports are saying he wants to go to Turkey. Who would he replace at Arsenal? In fact, Welbeck is playing better than any Man U striker, stats don't lie. There is a reason Man U are 10th and Arsenal are 4th, it's not rocket science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Van Persie and Rooney would both walk into your team.
posted on 4/11/14
Welbeck, Sanchez, Ox, Walcott, Ozil > RVP, Rooney, Januzij, Mata, Di Maria
posted on 4/11/14
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
posted on 4/11/14
Whats painful to see is the childish squabbling.
posted on 4/11/14
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
------------------
Nah it's hilarious seeing a team with ambition in the market get worse after signing "worldies"
posted on 4/11/14
comment by El Cap. (U9537)
posted 4 minutes ago
It must be painful for Arsenal fans to see a club who's gone just one season without winning the PL show this degree of ambition in the transfer market.
------------------
Nah it's hilarious seeing a team with ambition in the market get worse after signing "worldies"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Best get your laughs in early just in case, eh?
posted on 4/11/14
comment by Mamba - Here's one for you to suck on - Real Sosobad (U1282) (U13041)
posted 5 hours, 4 minutes ago
If the Falcout move is made permanent then including wages he will have cost United in excess of £100m or thereabouts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you know Lovren actually cost you £35m or so (assuming £50k a week wages)? What about Andy Carroll at £60m?
I genuinely can't understand why you include wages over a 5 year contract - by that logic Rooney has also cost us nearly £120m, can't you see how fúcking rétarded it is to include the wages?
Ozil actually cost Arsenal nearly £79m. In short Mamba, you're a moron.
Shaw and Fellaini were the only players starting on Sunday that were overpriced.
posted on 4/11/14
Jay you get really p'eed off and abusive anytime Falcout's wages are mentioned. I just mentioned the fact that you will be paying the said amount. Wasnt even addressing you. Have a word with yourself mate obviously there's something that really irks you about his wages.
posted on 4/11/14
Utd can spend a billion and they still wont win the league Chelsea and City will still do them in
posted on 4/11/14
comment by 9bit (U19964)
posted 13 hours, 55 minutes ago
Yes like we did with Ozil but I'm not boasting about spending 40m on a flop.
----------------------------------------------------------------
is Ozil a flop or not utilised in his best position. People seem to forget he was labelled the best No 10....but he is has been playing in the No 11 role.
2 games in the No 10 role this season and he got MOTM for both games.....just shows that maybe its not Ozil who is the flop but our manager (pains me to say this as I am a massive wenger fan) is the flop in his team selection................
posted on 4/11/14
He played almost all of last season as a no. 10, and only about 3 games this season on the left.
Page 2 of 2