Midfield would get destroyed. You need two athletic beasts like Petit and Vieira to get away with 4-4-2, not Arteta and Ramsey.
Man City are coming under pressure by a lot of analysts because 4-4-2 has stopped working for them. And they have players like Yaya, Fernandinho etc who should be able to make it work more than anyone!
We would get destroyed.
We played a 4-4-2 on Saturday pretty much.
Pretty much?
We pretty much played 2-4-4 rather than 4-4-2.
Well yeah Burnley kinda allowed that to happen. At least prior to actually kicking off it was a 4-4-2.
Disagree it 4-2-3-1. With Alexis in no.10 rotating with Cazorla. Alexis/Santi were never alongside Welbeck. They both dropped deeper as you world do in a 4-2-3-1. Wenger has gone to that formation to protect the back 4 and specifically Mertesacker as he did last season.
Off to the Emirates!
comment by D'Jeezus Bantaroni (U1137)
posted 30 minutes ago
Pretty much?
We pretty much played 2-4-4 rather than 4-4-2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what I also saw.
If we play 4-4-2, Poldi is better than Welbeck, IF we do play 4-4-2
comment by ronniec - In Bully We Trust (U15003)
posted 3 minutes ago
If we play 4-4-2, Poldi is better than Welbeck, IF we do play 4-4-2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on who is the other striker. Podolski is best as a support striker, so playing him alongside Alexis wouldn't be great. Playing him along Giroud or Sanogo would be Pods at his best, in terms of our current squad.
who the f is dat guy
***********************
Danny Welbeck I believe
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
4-4-fckin-2
Page 1 of 1
posted on 4/11/14
Midfield would get destroyed. You need two athletic beasts like Petit and Vieira to get away with 4-4-2, not Arteta and Ramsey.
posted on 4/11/14
Man City are coming under pressure by a lot of analysts because 4-4-2 has stopped working for them. And they have players like Yaya, Fernandinho etc who should be able to make it work more than anyone!
We would get destroyed.
posted on 4/11/14
We played a 4-4-2 on Saturday pretty much.
posted on 4/11/14
Pretty much?
We pretty much played 2-4-4 rather than 4-4-2.
posted on 4/11/14
Well yeah Burnley kinda allowed that to happen. At least prior to actually kicking off it was a 4-4-2.
posted on 4/11/14
Disagree it 4-2-3-1. With Alexis in no.10 rotating with Cazorla. Alexis/Santi were never alongside Welbeck. They both dropped deeper as you world do in a 4-2-3-1. Wenger has gone to that formation to protect the back 4 and specifically Mertesacker as he did last season.
Off to the Emirates!
posted on 4/11/14
comment by D'Jeezus Bantaroni (U1137)
posted 30 minutes ago
Pretty much?
We pretty much played 2-4-4 rather than 4-4-2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what I also saw.
posted on 4/11/14
If we play 4-4-2, Poldi is better than Welbeck, IF we do play 4-4-2
posted on 4/11/14
comment by ronniec - In Bully We Trust (U15003)
posted 3 minutes ago
If we play 4-4-2, Poldi is better than Welbeck, IF we do play 4-4-2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on who is the other striker. Podolski is best as a support striker, so playing him alongside Alexis wouldn't be great. Playing him along Giroud or Sanogo would be Pods at his best, in terms of our current squad.
posted on 4/11/14
who the f is dat guy
posted on 4/11/14
who the f is dat guy
***********************
Danny Welbeck I believe
Page 1 of 1