What can't you understand?

First you say tax havens wasn't set up for celtic....well that's been shown to be clearly wrong.

Then you try to switch the convo to some random called Charlotte...

Finally you say pzj has nothing to do with tax havens....I ask you how can you be so sure?

You can't squirm out of this one ie.

No I said it wasn't setup for the eu investigation as you then proved me right

It's not some random called Charlotte. As you clearly know.

I've no reason to believe its pjz.
You do?

Why are you so sure it's him?

And more tothe point, why does it even matter if it's him?
-----------

Just good to put a name to all the hard work tax havens has done.

"You can't squirm out of this one ie"

I just did and there was no squirming necessary

"Just good to put a name to all the hard work tax havens has done"


Ah right.

Is that it?

Here's me thinking it was something exciting

No I said it wasn't setup for the eu investigation as you then proved me right
------

No you said this



"Lookat you getting all para thinking it's just cropped up for ra tic ."

Obviously it was set up for celtic.

Should we feel flattered.

When we were talking about the eu investigation into ra tic

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

If you can show one bit of credible evidence to suggest this ill happily accept it.

Until then it's just the usual pash.

comment by Ibrox Elite - The Big Bad Bears (U5255)
posted 38 seconds ago
When we were talking about the eu investigation into ra tic
-------

I was talking about the tax havens guy and pzj....you tried to make out it was nothing to do with celtic. God only knows why.

See my last post

Credible evidence other than the guy behind it saying EVERY single complainant was a rangers shareholder.

Ok ok I am happy to concede that not every shareholder these days is a rangers fan but chances are high most of them involved in the Celtic complaint will have been rangers fans of some description.

Who's saying that every complainant was a gers shareholder?


The EU?

You wouldn't believe that either ie.

"EU nah man they're just rangers haters"

I can't argue with a guy who will blindly defend the opposing view no matter what is presented. For whatever reason, I don't even want to try and understand, you will not accept that the bears were behind the complaints.

You were doing so well until you were asked for some proof

Funnily enough i didn't complain about my own club but the guy who did says it was all bears who am I to doubt him. I'll leave that up to you 'doubting thomas'.

What guy?



Going round in circles here. The net result is the same tho. No matter how hard you try

Going round in circles here.
-------

Aye because you refuse to recognise the truth. I can't make the blind see.

Yes you can. Just something from the EU confirming it was the big bad bears. Or anything in the least bit credible

the big bad bears

Why would I have anything from the EU yer man who was in contact with the EU investigators does tho and he says all complainants were bears.