comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 14 hours, 21 minutes ago
And therein lies the problem with this forum. Something which we are ALL guilty of.
An inability to just let it go.
When someone is so intent on proving themselves inept and incapable of sensible debate with you that they revert to a single issue against you it is time to stop the discussion and move on.
The argument has been decided in your favour, the other person has admitted defeat by his pathetic yet defeatist actions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
must admit GC it gets a little pathetic on here at times -
------------- much of it has its roots in people becoming bitter , hurt and twisted if you dont always share there hero worship for there chosen driver ( and yes something that trivial has always been the root cause )
so they bare silly grudges and then of course the idiotic bickering starts over the slightest comment on here ,ego"s are hurt , insults are hurled , schoolgirl gossiping abounds , and so it goes on -
--------------- sad to say that was the root cause of the rubbish on bbc 606 and sadly we have a scaled down version of bbc 606 on here at times ---
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
Mate, it is so funny, imagine if this is exactly like this at work. Think of his poor colleagues
We had an enjoyable discussion a couple of days ago about how easy it was to drive the current F1 cars. Of course martial started with the cars are easy to drive then eventually argued with himself to the point where he said they were so sophisticated to drive then eventually said he was not a designer so did not know which ones were easier to drive.
We were talking about the redbulls of 2013 and 2014. Even when I gave him clues like downforce and torque. The downforce one was a bit difficult considering the Monaco situation, he still maintained he did not know which was easier to drive.
You really have to wonder what goes on in the mind of someone with 2 completely different points of view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lets have the story correct manx if you are going to gossip like a little schoolgirl -
----------- you could not grasp the pont i was making and then ran away from me when you had no answer as you have done many times on the forum with me when you cannot counter my points on here -
---------- by the way if you have the bollox instead of running away again we can always continue the debate on the thread --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, how did I run away, I asked you which car was easier to drive.
Gave you 2 options
Redbull 2013
RedBull 2014
You did not answer, waffled all over the place then said you were not a designer and did not know.
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
Mate, it is so funny, imagine if this is exactly like this at work. Think of his poor colleagues
We had an enjoyable discussion a couple of days ago about how easy it was to drive the current F1 cars. Of course martial started with the cars are easy to drive then eventually argued with himself to the point where he said they were so sophisticated to drive then eventually said he was not a designer so did not know which ones were easier to drive.
We were talking about the redbulls of 2013 and 2014. Even when I gave him clues like downforce and torque. The downforce one was a bit difficult considering the Monaco situation, he still maintained he did not know which was easier to drive.
You really have to wonder what goes on in the mind of someone with 2 completely different points of view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lets have the story correct manx if you are going to gossip like a little schoolgirl -
----------- you could not grasp the pont i was making and then ran away from me when you had no answer as you have done many times on the forum with me when you cannot counter my points on here -
---------- by the way if you have the bollox instead of running away again we can always continue the debate on the thread --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, how did I run away, I asked you which car was easier to drive.
Gave you 2 options
Redbull 2013
RedBull 2014
You did not answer, waffled all over the place then said you were not a designer and did not know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so why the silly gossiping on here when you were not prepared to finish the debate on the thread itself -
on a serious note if you want to finish the debate we can continue it on there , i am sure we both have decent points to make --
----------------- see you over there tomorrow night if you want
Martial can you please explain to me how someone can gossip on a public forum
Depends on your defenition MUDD. Most people say 'gossiping behind someones back's
Well you certainly can't do that on a public forum. However if it isn't behind someones back I guess it just means talking about someone.
It could also just mean having a chat.
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 15 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 49 minutes ago
TBH - most issues on here are brought up and thers a consensus and an agreement to whats right or whatever.
So you actively seek out those that disagree - the whole basis of a debate. Martial is that guy, which is fine, disagreements are good.
As i have said before, its not that he disagrees, its inconsistencies, his demand for proof without providing any his self, any "proof" he provides, isnt proof, its conjecture. Its at this point people get frustrated, he states its harmless opinions! YES MARTIAL but the whole point is to discuss those opinions, but yours are often farcical, dimwitted. You get to telling him this, he then antagonises you, patronises you, gets involved in silly repetitive games, the wtcbu comes in and calls him a fool, he then uses the word bile, and geriatric and hurling. Everything breaks down.
Root problem is martial im afraid, yes we dont help, we could just ignore him, but generally we mostly agree, so there arent many to debate with. Those that i have disagreed with in the past, i have no problems with. So why do i him.
He needs to be banned - he is pushing me away - you know with my delicate sensitivies, and mudds blubbering, we cant deal with him.
He also makes a competition of debating, he refers to winning debates, or you wouldnt dare debate with me, or guts to debate with me. WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT!!!!!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
roughly deciphered you dont like anybody that has an objective view of your little leweyyyyyyyy and you get the hump when people dont say what you want them to say -
that has generally been the basis of your silly little tantrums , abuse , insults , silly name calling on here with me , not forgetting i have always remained fairly polite and civil towards you because of your young age
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can u breakdown how uve deciphered that i dont like anybody who has an objective view of little leweyyyyyyyy.
Assuming u know the meaning of objective....?
Well that took some time didn't it Martial, why couldn't you have just answered the question the first time round? Whether you thought I was serious or not surely a short answer is easier than post after post of mindless jibber jabbering
Maybe this is the correct way to answer a question, now it's my turn to answer something I should waffle around about nothingness. Did you see the football this week?
You wouldn't believe me if I told you who I was anyway, you have no interest in the matter, it's just one of your ways you like to try and dodge simple questions. But to answer your question, I am on n606, and have always had the same name.
Maybe we should stick to chatting F1, not that you actually want to, you can't even address me without some 8 year old insults thrown in
Now, now 6not6not6, my good ol bruvver, are you trying to talk F1 like those doillies on SKY?
Quite possibly, normally I can find some sort of level to talk about F1 with anyone. So far I've yet to find something to talk about with Martial for any sustained length of time. One could almost presume he doesn't actually want to discuss F1 sensibly at all! Always end up on one of his long winded waffles when it becomes apparent that he doesn't actually know what he's arguing about
Now you are gossiping about people on this forum like some gutless coward. Can you not back your mouth up and debate my whims?
His prejudice against tattoed individuals, and his assumption of a lack of intelligence.
Google matt taylor, rosetta scientist. Must be a right thicko
There's only one " Gutless coward " on here and that's me.
I dare any-one to declare themselves to be a better gutless coward than me?
BTW. Any-one with a tattoe should be shot IMO.
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 15 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 49 minutes ago
TBH - most issues on here are brought up and thers a consensus and an agreement to whats right or whatever.
So you actively seek out those that disagree - the whole basis of a debate. Martial is that guy, which is fine, disagreements are good.
As i have said before, its not that he disagrees, its inconsistencies, his demand for proof without providing any his self, any "proof" he provides, isnt proof, its conjecture. Its at this point people get frustrated, he states its harmless opinions! YES MARTIAL but the whole point is to discuss those opinions, but yours are often farcical, dimwitted. You get to telling him this, he then antagonises you, patronises you, gets involved in silly repetitive games, the wtcbu comes in and calls him a fool, he then uses the word bile, and geriatric and hurling. Everything breaks down.
Root problem is martial im afraid, yes we dont help, we could just ignore him, but generally we mostly agree, so there arent many to debate with. Those that i have disagreed with in the past, i have no problems with. So why do i him.
He needs to be banned - he is pushing me away - you know with my delicate sensitivies, and mudds blubbering, we cant deal with him.
He also makes a competition of debating, he refers to winning debates, or you wouldnt dare debate with me, or guts to debate with me. WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT!!!!!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
roughly deciphered you dont like anybody that has an objective view of your little leweyyyyyyyy and you get the hump when people dont say what you want them to say -
that has generally been the basis of your silly little tantrums , abuse , insults , silly name calling on here with me , not forgetting i have always remained fairly polite and civil towards you because of your young age
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can u breakdown how uve deciphered that i dont like anybody who has an objective view of little leweyyyyyyyy.
Assuming u know the meaning of objective....?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
inbetween all the little tantrums , insults, silly names , that you have hurled at me when i am being polite and civil to you i can only imagine you do it because i do not share your infatuation with little lewey -
-------------- what can i say
You tell him martial! No one can defeat you the masterdebate!
Your whims are off the chain!
Aww poor old martial and his delicate personality. Ive just shed a tear
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
Well that took some time didn't it Martial, why couldn't you have just answered the question the first time round? Whether you thought I was serious or not surely a short answer is easier than post after post of mindless jibber jabbering
Maybe this is the correct way to answer a question, now it's my turn to answer something I should waffle around about nothingness. Did you see the football this week?
You wouldn't believe me if I told you who I was anyway, you have no interest in the matter, it's just one of your ways you like to try and dodge simple questions. But to answer your question, I am on n606, and have always had the same name.
Maybe we should stick to chatting F1, not that you actually want to, you can't even address me without some 8 year old insults thrown in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come on then keep your side of the agreement as i kept mine - you dont want to come across as somebody that has a strawberry blancmange for a backbone by not keeping your side of the agreement or worst still a sad internet phoney -
--------- not saying you are but you might come across as somebody like that if you dont honour your agreements on here -
---------- who are you then , and believe me i am acutely aware of the long time members on there and there style of writing and posting
Come on now Martial, if you know all the long term posters you know who I am, me telling you what you already know isn't going to help you.
I've closely studied your answering techniques, I have a good two weeks of question dodging before we even address the question.
You've sown your own downfall, I treat others how they treat me... sucks to be you
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 6 hours, 58 minutes ago
Quite possibly, normally I can find some sort of level to talk about F1 with anyone. So far I've yet to find something to talk about with Martial for any sustained length of time. One could almost presume he doesn't actually want to discuss F1 sensibly at all! Always end up on one of his long winded waffles when it becomes apparent that he doesn't actually know what he's arguing about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like everybody else on here you have had plenty of chances to talk about F1 with me as i have wrote some of the more thought provoking topics on here and i have given plenty of opinions on plenty of F1 related matters -
what has ever stopped you talking to me more often
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 2 minutes ago
Come on now Martial, if you know all the long term posters you know who I am, me telling you what you already know isn't going to help you.
I've closely studied your answering techniques, I have a good two weeks of question dodging before we even address the question.
You've sown your own downfall, I treat others how they treat me... sucks to be you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok nsix --- fair enough i wont push you anymore as we both know you are telling a little fairytale --
not quite sure what you get from living in a little fantasy world but never mind
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 59 seconds ago
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh ok fair play --- which one and i will respond to you on it --
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 16 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 59 seconds ago
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh ok fair play --- which one and i will respond to you on it --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
gave you a reply on my vettel topic that you posted on last night
Sign in if you want to comment
Why do good posters...
Page 3 of 3
posted on 27/11/14
comment by go-cellino-go (U6730)
posted 14 hours, 21 minutes ago
And therein lies the problem with this forum. Something which we are ALL guilty of.
An inability to just let it go.
When someone is so intent on proving themselves inept and incapable of sensible debate with you that they revert to a single issue against you it is time to stop the discussion and move on.
The argument has been decided in your favour, the other person has admitted defeat by his pathetic yet defeatist actions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
must admit GC it gets a little pathetic on here at times -
------------- much of it has its roots in people becoming bitter , hurt and twisted if you dont always share there hero worship for there chosen driver ( and yes something that trivial has always been the root cause )
so they bare silly grudges and then of course the idiotic bickering starts over the slightest comment on here ,ego"s are hurt , insults are hurled , schoolgirl gossiping abounds , and so it goes on -
--------------- sad to say that was the root cause of the rubbish on bbc 606 and sadly we have a scaled down version of bbc 606 on here at times ---
posted on 27/11/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
Mate, it is so funny, imagine if this is exactly like this at work. Think of his poor colleagues
We had an enjoyable discussion a couple of days ago about how easy it was to drive the current F1 cars. Of course martial started with the cars are easy to drive then eventually argued with himself to the point where he said they were so sophisticated to drive then eventually said he was not a designer so did not know which ones were easier to drive.
We were talking about the redbulls of 2013 and 2014. Even when I gave him clues like downforce and torque. The downforce one was a bit difficult considering the Monaco situation, he still maintained he did not know which was easier to drive.
You really have to wonder what goes on in the mind of someone with 2 completely different points of view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lets have the story correct manx if you are going to gossip like a little schoolgirl -
----------- you could not grasp the pont i was making and then ran away from me when you had no answer as you have done many times on the forum with me when you cannot counter my points on here -
---------- by the way if you have the bollox instead of running away again we can always continue the debate on the thread --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, how did I run away, I asked you which car was easier to drive.
Gave you 2 options
Redbull 2013
RedBull 2014
You did not answer, waffled all over the place then said you were not a designer and did not know.
posted on 27/11/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 6 hours, 24 minutes ago
Mate, it is so funny, imagine if this is exactly like this at work. Think of his poor colleagues
We had an enjoyable discussion a couple of days ago about how easy it was to drive the current F1 cars. Of course martial started with the cars are easy to drive then eventually argued with himself to the point where he said they were so sophisticated to drive then eventually said he was not a designer so did not know which ones were easier to drive.
We were talking about the redbulls of 2013 and 2014. Even when I gave him clues like downforce and torque. The downforce one was a bit difficult considering the Monaco situation, he still maintained he did not know which was easier to drive.
You really have to wonder what goes on in the mind of someone with 2 completely different points of view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lets have the story correct manx if you are going to gossip like a little schoolgirl -
----------- you could not grasp the pont i was making and then ran away from me when you had no answer as you have done many times on the forum with me when you cannot counter my points on here -
---------- by the way if you have the bollox instead of running away again we can always continue the debate on the thread --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Martial, how did I run away, I asked you which car was easier to drive.
Gave you 2 options
Redbull 2013
RedBull 2014
You did not answer, waffled all over the place then said you were not a designer and did not know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so why the silly gossiping on here when you were not prepared to finish the debate on the thread itself -
on a serious note if you want to finish the debate we can continue it on there , i am sure we both have decent points to make --
----------------- see you over there tomorrow night if you want
posted on 27/11/14
Martial can you please explain to me how someone can gossip on a public forum
posted on 28/11/14
Depends on your defenition MUDD. Most people say 'gossiping behind someones back's
Well you certainly can't do that on a public forum. However if it isn't behind someones back I guess it just means talking about someone.
It could also just mean having a chat.
posted on 28/11/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 15 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 49 minutes ago
TBH - most issues on here are brought up and thers a consensus and an agreement to whats right or whatever.
So you actively seek out those that disagree - the whole basis of a debate. Martial is that guy, which is fine, disagreements are good.
As i have said before, its not that he disagrees, its inconsistencies, his demand for proof without providing any his self, any "proof" he provides, isnt proof, its conjecture. Its at this point people get frustrated, he states its harmless opinions! YES MARTIAL but the whole point is to discuss those opinions, but yours are often farcical, dimwitted. You get to telling him this, he then antagonises you, patronises you, gets involved in silly repetitive games, the wtcbu comes in and calls him a fool, he then uses the word bile, and geriatric and hurling. Everything breaks down.
Root problem is martial im afraid, yes we dont help, we could just ignore him, but generally we mostly agree, so there arent many to debate with. Those that i have disagreed with in the past, i have no problems with. So why do i him.
He needs to be banned - he is pushing me away - you know with my delicate sensitivies, and mudds blubbering, we cant deal with him.
He also makes a competition of debating, he refers to winning debates, or you wouldnt dare debate with me, or guts to debate with me. WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT!!!!!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
roughly deciphered you dont like anybody that has an objective view of your little leweyyyyyyyy and you get the hump when people dont say what you want them to say -
that has generally been the basis of your silly little tantrums , abuse , insults , silly name calling on here with me , not forgetting i have always remained fairly polite and civil towards you because of your young age
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can u breakdown how uve deciphered that i dont like anybody who has an objective view of little leweyyyyyyyy.
Assuming u know the meaning of objective....?
posted on 28/11/14
Well that took some time didn't it Martial, why couldn't you have just answered the question the first time round? Whether you thought I was serious or not surely a short answer is easier than post after post of mindless jibber jabbering
Maybe this is the correct way to answer a question, now it's my turn to answer something I should waffle around about nothingness. Did you see the football this week?
You wouldn't believe me if I told you who I was anyway, you have no interest in the matter, it's just one of your ways you like to try and dodge simple questions. But to answer your question, I am on n606, and have always had the same name.
Maybe we should stick to chatting F1, not that you actually want to, you can't even address me without some 8 year old insults thrown in
posted on 28/11/14
Now, now 6not6not6, my good ol bruvver, are you trying to talk F1 like those doillies on SKY?
posted on 28/11/14
Quite possibly, normally I can find some sort of level to talk about F1 with anyone. So far I've yet to find something to talk about with Martial for any sustained length of time. One could almost presume he doesn't actually want to discuss F1 sensibly at all! Always end up on one of his long winded waffles when it becomes apparent that he doesn't actually know what he's arguing about
posted on 28/11/14
Now you are gossiping about people on this forum like some gutless coward. Can you not back your mouth up and debate my whims?
posted on 28/11/14
His prejudice against tattoed individuals, and his assumption of a lack of intelligence.
Google matt taylor, rosetta scientist. Must be a right thicko
posted on 28/11/14
There's only one " Gutless coward " on here and that's me.
I dare any-one to declare themselves to be a better gutless coward than me?
posted on 28/11/14
BTW. Any-one with a tattoe should be shot IMO.
posted on 28/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 15 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 7 hours, 49 minutes ago
TBH - most issues on here are brought up and thers a consensus and an agreement to whats right or whatever.
So you actively seek out those that disagree - the whole basis of a debate. Martial is that guy, which is fine, disagreements are good.
As i have said before, its not that he disagrees, its inconsistencies, his demand for proof without providing any his self, any "proof" he provides, isnt proof, its conjecture. Its at this point people get frustrated, he states its harmless opinions! YES MARTIAL but the whole point is to discuss those opinions, but yours are often farcical, dimwitted. You get to telling him this, he then antagonises you, patronises you, gets involved in silly repetitive games, the wtcbu comes in and calls him a fool, he then uses the word bile, and geriatric and hurling. Everything breaks down.
Root problem is martial im afraid, yes we dont help, we could just ignore him, but generally we mostly agree, so there arent many to debate with. Those that i have disagreed with in the past, i have no problems with. So why do i him.
He needs to be banned - he is pushing me away - you know with my delicate sensitivies, and mudds blubbering, we cant deal with him.
He also makes a competition of debating, he refers to winning debates, or you wouldnt dare debate with me, or guts to debate with me. WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT!!!!!!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
roughly deciphered you dont like anybody that has an objective view of your little leweyyyyyyyy and you get the hump when people dont say what you want them to say -
that has generally been the basis of your silly little tantrums , abuse , insults , silly name calling on here with me , not forgetting i have always remained fairly polite and civil towards you because of your young age
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can u breakdown how uve deciphered that i dont like anybody who has an objective view of little leweyyyyyyyy.
Assuming u know the meaning of objective....?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
inbetween all the little tantrums , insults, silly names , that you have hurled at me when i am being polite and civil to you i can only imagine you do it because i do not share your infatuation with little lewey -
-------------- what can i say
posted on 28/11/14
You tell him martial! No one can defeat you the masterdebate!
Your whims are off the chain!
posted on 28/11/14
Aww poor old martial and his delicate personality. Ive just shed a tear
posted on 28/11/14
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
Well that took some time didn't it Martial, why couldn't you have just answered the question the first time round? Whether you thought I was serious or not surely a short answer is easier than post after post of mindless jibber jabbering
Maybe this is the correct way to answer a question, now it's my turn to answer something I should waffle around about nothingness. Did you see the football this week?
You wouldn't believe me if I told you who I was anyway, you have no interest in the matter, it's just one of your ways you like to try and dodge simple questions. But to answer your question, I am on n606, and have always had the same name.
Maybe we should stick to chatting F1, not that you actually want to, you can't even address me without some 8 year old insults thrown in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
come on then keep your side of the agreement as i kept mine - you dont want to come across as somebody that has a strawberry blancmange for a backbone by not keeping your side of the agreement or worst still a sad internet phoney -
--------- not saying you are but you might come across as somebody like that if you dont honour your agreements on here -
---------- who are you then , and believe me i am acutely aware of the long time members on there and there style of writing and posting
posted on 28/11/14
Come on now Martial, if you know all the long term posters you know who I am, me telling you what you already know isn't going to help you.
I've closely studied your answering techniques, I have a good two weeks of question dodging before we even address the question.
You've sown your own downfall, I treat others how they treat me... sucks to be you
posted on 28/11/14
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 6 hours, 58 minutes ago
Quite possibly, normally I can find some sort of level to talk about F1 with anyone. So far I've yet to find something to talk about with Martial for any sustained length of time. One could almost presume he doesn't actually want to discuss F1 sensibly at all! Always end up on one of his long winded waffles when it becomes apparent that he doesn't actually know what he's arguing about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like everybody else on here you have had plenty of chances to talk about F1 with me as i have wrote some of the more thought provoking topics on here and i have given plenty of opinions on plenty of F1 related matters -
what has ever stopped you talking to me more often
posted on 28/11/14
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
posted on 28/11/14
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 2 minutes ago
Come on now Martial, if you know all the long term posters you know who I am, me telling you what you already know isn't going to help you.
I've closely studied your answering techniques, I have a good two weeks of question dodging before we even address the question.
You've sown your own downfall, I treat others how they treat me... sucks to be you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ok nsix --- fair enough i wont push you anymore as we both know you are telling a little fairytale --
not quite sure what you get from living in a little fantasy world but never mind
posted on 28/11/14
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 59 seconds ago
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh ok fair play --- which one and i will respond to you on it --
posted on 29/11/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 16 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 59 seconds ago
I engaged in one of your F1 topics elsewhere today Martial, yet it seems your first port of call upon returning are the none F1 'discussions'. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh ok fair play --- which one and i will respond to you on it --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
gave you a reply on my vettel topic that you posted on last night
Page 3 of 3