comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Kevin De Bruyne #BurritoBaconSushiRoll (U14678)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
It won't happen because it would be stupid to. Hazard still remains our biggest attacking threat, regularly drawing 2-3 opponents towards him. Mata flourished under a different system, so comparisons there are null. And finally we have no one else in the team that can do what Hazard can do. Willian is the logical choice to be dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so many flaws in ur argument as usual KDB.
Hazard is still our biggest attacking threat? No that is costa, or drogba, or remy when there on. For the amount hazard sees the ball, there is minimal finishing product.
Im comparing footballers, doesnt matter what system they play in, mata was more productive in every way for chelsea bar a bit of defensive duty(even though do we concede that much less nowadays then we did with mata?) and he got sold. There is no reason hazard should not be dropped other than scrhulles poor form and reluctance to give salah or remy a chance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So many flaws yet you failed to pick out one.
I don't know why you picked those 3? Is it because of goals? Torres scored more goals for us when Mata was going through his golden spell, did that make him the biggest attacking threat in our team? Remy , just shows how poorly thought out your response is.
Your second point is rubbish. Of course it matters what system you play in, players thrive in different systems, systems which suite them, and my point is proven by the way Mata failed to do well when Mourinho changed the system, Oscar suited it, hence we sold Mata
Finally there are good reasons Hazard should not be dropped as first of all he is not playing as bad as you're making up and I don't know where you got your phantom poor attitude Hazard displays from. Secondly we have no players in the team that can replicate what he does for us in terms of dribbling through opposition, dragging players out of position whilst keeping possession and creating space for others. Even without scoring goals he is invaluable to us, scoring goals would be a bonus. Your judgement is very poor, I remember you saying Hazard played poorly against Leicester earlier on in the season, whilst most, if not everyone else here, was praising his performance, as well as different match reports.
Finally again it will be a stupid move dropping him, hence it won't happen. Mourinho thankfully is not that stupid.
are you still in school by any chance?
how was there no flaws? you said hazard was our biggest attacking threat? stats prove otherwise. 1 massive flaw.
And torres scored more goals for us then mata in his golden spell? mata scored 18 in 80 games compared to torres 20 in 120 odd games. so thats just a bare faced lie. And thats not takin into account assists.
And we get it...you dont like remy you dont have to lie to fuel arguments though.
Anyways I will repeat myself because you obviously have not listened. I am not doubting his qualities. But you seem to think he should be immune from a drop which no player, no matter there name, should be. He does do all the things you do, but so could other players given a chance, and he doesnt do those things near enough. I've seen him do it, but against newcastle and sunderland he definately didnt and he goes through 60-70 minutes in some games without doing much at all.
Utd game, rafael got a yellow after 5 minutes, he then got through on goal and had a goof first half...he might aswell dissapeared after that.
Your judgement is poorer than mine mate, you dont seem to have a clue what your talking about and make up lies. I go to games and watch everyone I dont go too a few times/ hazard is a wonderful player, but no player is immune.
No player is immune, and I didn't say that. I said Hazard won't get dropped because it would be stupid based on the the players we have and what he brings to the team. I would wager he won't get dropped, and you know that's true.
Torres actually scored more goals than Mata in that season? I think you're making up numbers. I used this to show the sillyness of your argument to base a players attacking threat on goals especially as one plays is a striker and another is a winger/playmaker who's job is to create attacking play, which Hazard does very well.
I don't hate Remy (I don't understand the hype in him given what he has done for us), but to put a player who has barely featured for us up with one of our seasons best performers is again silly, and shows the lack of thought you have put behind your argument.
Your last paragraph is just dribble. And going to matches doesn't prove much, I've been to matches, and you get a better perspective of a players performance on the tv seeing the overall bigger picture then do you at live matches. So that probably is where your problem lies with such poor judgement of players contributions during the match.
Arguments with you are funny, it always seems to end up with you bragging about how you go to football matches or how you play football, and therefore you have a greater understanding of things.
Just dribble?
"And going to matches doesn't prove much, I've been to matches, and you get a better perspective of a players performance on the tv seeing the overall bigger picture then do you at live matches"
I don't think you would find anyone who would agree with u on this forum on thst sentence right there...you have made urself look awfully silly. Why do u think scouts go to games? Lol.
You really can't see the pace of the game on tv, the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch. Why am I even debating this. That is a ridiculous view and shows a severe lack of footy knowledge.
I'm not arguing with you really. Just humouring your ridiculous views.
Maybe stick to footy manager.
Still laughing at the dribble and the better perspective comments.
I don't think you would find anyone who would agree with u on this forum on thst sentence right there...you have made urself look awfully silly. Why do u think scouts go to games? Lol.
You really can't see the pace of the game on tv, the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch. Why am I even debating this. That is a ridiculous view and shows a severe lack of footy knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------
scouts actually watch video tapes as well, as do managers of they game they've managed and the tapes of teams they're about to play.
"the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch"
Yes you can, this is just another lie you have convinced yourself of. You also get the added benefit of watching these from different angles on replays.
You're not arguing because the original point I made that Hazard won't get dropped because it would be stupid to - you know is correct. Tried your best to deflect on many occasions...only to bring up crap points.
Good night Nicky, sleep tight snuggled up to your Gary Cahill (a player we should be looking to replace by the way) teddy bear .
Sign in if you want to comment
Schurrle should be given a run of 4,5 match
Page 2 of 2
posted on 8/12/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Kevin De Bruyne #BurritoBaconSushiRoll (U14678)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
It won't happen because it would be stupid to. Hazard still remains our biggest attacking threat, regularly drawing 2-3 opponents towards him. Mata flourished under a different system, so comparisons there are null. And finally we have no one else in the team that can do what Hazard can do. Willian is the logical choice to be dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so many flaws in ur argument as usual KDB.
Hazard is still our biggest attacking threat? No that is costa, or drogba, or remy when there on. For the amount hazard sees the ball, there is minimal finishing product.
Im comparing footballers, doesnt matter what system they play in, mata was more productive in every way for chelsea bar a bit of defensive duty(even though do we concede that much less nowadays then we did with mata?) and he got sold. There is no reason hazard should not be dropped other than scrhulles poor form and reluctance to give salah or remy a chance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So many flaws yet you failed to pick out one.
I don't know why you picked those 3? Is it because of goals? Torres scored more goals for us when Mata was going through his golden spell, did that make him the biggest attacking threat in our team? Remy , just shows how poorly thought out your response is.
Your second point is rubbish. Of course it matters what system you play in, players thrive in different systems, systems which suite them, and my point is proven by the way Mata failed to do well when Mourinho changed the system, Oscar suited it, hence we sold Mata
Finally there are good reasons Hazard should not be dropped as first of all he is not playing as bad as you're making up and I don't know where you got your phantom poor attitude Hazard displays from. Secondly we have no players in the team that can replicate what he does for us in terms of dribbling through opposition, dragging players out of position whilst keeping possession and creating space for others. Even without scoring goals he is invaluable to us, scoring goals would be a bonus. Your judgement is very poor, I remember you saying Hazard played poorly against Leicester earlier on in the season, whilst most, if not everyone else here, was praising his performance, as well as different match reports.
Finally again it will be a stupid move dropping him, hence it won't happen. Mourinho thankfully is not that stupid.
posted on 8/12/14
are you still in school by any chance?
how was there no flaws? you said hazard was our biggest attacking threat? stats prove otherwise. 1 massive flaw.
And torres scored more goals for us then mata in his golden spell? mata scored 18 in 80 games compared to torres 20 in 120 odd games. so thats just a bare faced lie. And thats not takin into account assists.
And we get it...you dont like remy you dont have to lie to fuel arguments though.
Anyways I will repeat myself because you obviously have not listened. I am not doubting his qualities. But you seem to think he should be immune from a drop which no player, no matter there name, should be. He does do all the things you do, but so could other players given a chance, and he doesnt do those things near enough. I've seen him do it, but against newcastle and sunderland he definately didnt and he goes through 60-70 minutes in some games without doing much at all.
Utd game, rafael got a yellow after 5 minutes, he then got through on goal and had a goof first half...he might aswell dissapeared after that.
Your judgement is poorer than mine mate, you dont seem to have a clue what your talking about and make up lies. I go to games and watch everyone I dont go too a few times/ hazard is a wonderful player, but no player is immune.
posted on 8/12/14
No player is immune, and I didn't say that. I said Hazard won't get dropped because it would be stupid based on the the players we have and what he brings to the team. I would wager he won't get dropped, and you know that's true.
Torres actually scored more goals than Mata in that season? I think you're making up numbers. I used this to show the sillyness of your argument to base a players attacking threat on goals especially as one plays is a striker and another is a winger/playmaker who's job is to create attacking play, which Hazard does very well.
I don't hate Remy (I don't understand the hype in him given what he has done for us), but to put a player who has barely featured for us up with one of our seasons best performers is again silly, and shows the lack of thought you have put behind your argument.
Your last paragraph is just dribble. And going to matches doesn't prove much, I've been to matches, and you get a better perspective of a players performance on the tv seeing the overall bigger picture then do you at live matches. So that probably is where your problem lies with such poor judgement of players contributions during the match.
Arguments with you are funny, it always seems to end up with you bragging about how you go to football matches or how you play football, and therefore you have a greater understanding of things.
posted on 8/12/14
Just dribble?
"And going to matches doesn't prove much, I've been to matches, and you get a better perspective of a players performance on the tv seeing the overall bigger picture then do you at live matches"
I don't think you would find anyone who would agree with u on this forum on thst sentence right there...you have made urself look awfully silly. Why do u think scouts go to games? Lol.
You really can't see the pace of the game on tv, the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch. Why am I even debating this. That is a ridiculous view and shows a severe lack of footy knowledge.
I'm not arguing with you really. Just humouring your ridiculous views.
Maybe stick to footy manager.
posted on 8/12/14
Still laughing at the dribble and the better perspective comments.
posted on 8/12/14
I don't think you would find anyone who would agree with u on this forum on thst sentence right there...you have made urself look awfully silly. Why do u think scouts go to games? Lol.
You really can't see the pace of the game on tv, the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch. Why am I even debating this. That is a ridiculous view and shows a severe lack of footy knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------
scouts actually watch video tapes as well, as do managers of they game they've managed and the tapes of teams they're about to play.
"the personal 1 on 1 battles off the ball, the runs, the first touch"
Yes you can, this is just another lie you have convinced yourself of. You also get the added benefit of watching these from different angles on replays.
You're not arguing because the original point I made that Hazard won't get dropped because it would be stupid to - you know is correct. Tried your best to deflect on many occasions...only to bring up crap points.
Good night Nicky, sleep tight snuggled up to your Gary Cahill (a player we should be looking to replace by the way) teddy bear .
Page 2 of 2