comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 47 seconds ago
Astonishing that anyone could refer to a rape support group as a “bitter old bunch”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about the Society for Black Lawyers? Yes, they have good intentions...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, I thought that when I read Stuart Pearce's comment, but they are hardly comparable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf I thought that, after I pressed 'Send'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf luv u
Two things:
1) Surely he has been out the game so long that he is a bit sheit now?
2) What did he actually apologise for?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30727380
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I read his appeal will be heard in 35 weeks?
I heard they turned down his appeal but he said hes gonna turn up at court anyway?
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 2 minutes ago
Two things:
1) Surely he has been out the game so long that he is a bit sheit now?
2) What did he actually apologise for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Maybe
2) Basically for the outcome of sleeping with that woman. He still maintains his innocence, but accepts it's been hard for her too. He apologised to everyone, really.
comment by Chicken - Mr Consistent✔ (U1043)
posted 3 minutes ago
jlou1978
No, three separate high court judges did in detail, in London, and decided he had no right to appeal.
===================
Is his appeal not going ahead then? If there is no appeal, why are the rape group complaining about it being rushed through?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not an appeal as such, the case is being referred to the office that investigates miscarriages of justice.
2) Basically for the outcome of sleeping with that woman. He still maintains his innocence, but accepts it's been hard for her too. He apologised to everyone, really.
Fair enough.
Clearly it does look like it's an issue of apology that was made due to being rejected by Oldham.
He should have done this from the start. Can't believe he wouldn't have been advised to do this earlier.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Its not an appeal as such, the case is being referred to the office that investigates miscarriages of justice.
===============
I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like an appeal to me.
s his appeal not going ahead then? If there is no appeal, why are the rape group complaining about it being rushed through?
===============================
The CCRC, The Criminal Cases Review Commission, were not expected to revue the details of another Appeal application till 2017, but have said they will fast track it through, some time in the next 35 weeks, but gave no reason as to why.
This is probably why 'women against rape' have an issue with this decision.
(not having a go here Spurtle as I feel the same)
Its funny that we are all so cynical, everyone wants him to give an apology, then when he does no-one believes it was genuine.
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 second ago
(not having a go here Spurtle as I feel the same)
Its funny that we are all so cynical, everyone wants him to give an apology, then when he does no-one believes it was genuine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so true
"If he just apologies, everyone would feel different"
*apologises publicly*
"well, not like that"
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
jlou1978
This is probably why 'women against rape' have an issue with this decision.
=======================
But why should they care? If there is evidence to prove he didnt - they should welcome it. If the evidence still shows him to be guilty - then they should be pleased at that too.
They just want to control the situation.
Women Against Rape Group should mind their own business and leave it to the courts to decide when and if his appeal is heard.
But why should they care? If there is evidence to prove he didnt - they should welcome it. If the evidence still shows him to be guilty - then they should be pleased at that too.
==================================
The revue isn't necessarily being brought forward due to new evidence as to the innocence of Ched Evans.
If there was new strong evidence to his innocence, a time frame of possibly 35 weeks would never have been mentioned, and he would be looking at a direct appeal imminently.
The CCRC reserve the right to fast track cases, without giving full exposure of the details as to why.
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 20 seconds ago
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His legal team might have told him not to in case it prejudices his case.
Somethings we can only guess at, lets face it no one on this site has all the facts
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 20 seconds ago
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His legal team might have told him not to in case it prejudices his case.
Somethings we can only guess at, lets face it no one on this site has all the facts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He needs to get a new legal team then if that was their advice.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Manslaughter worse than rape
__________________________________________
It is to the victim and their family.
Sign in if you want to comment
Ched Evans Article No. 275
Page 2 of 5
posted on 8/1/15
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 47 seconds ago
Astonishing that anyone could refer to a rape support group as a “bitter old bunch”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about the Society for Black Lawyers? Yes, they have good intentions...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf, I thought that when I read Stuart Pearce's comment, but they are hardly comparable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf I thought that, after I pressed 'Send'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf luv u
posted on 8/1/15
Two things:
1) Surely he has been out the game so long that he is a bit sheit now?
2) What did he actually apologise for?
posted on 8/1/15
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30727380
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
I read his appeal will be heard in 35 weeks?
posted on 8/1/15
I heard they turned down his appeal but he said hes gonna turn up at court anyway?
posted on 8/1/15
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 2 minutes ago
Two things:
1) Surely he has been out the game so long that he is a bit sheit now?
2) What did he actually apologise for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Maybe
2) Basically for the outcome of sleeping with that woman. He still maintains his innocence, but accepts it's been hard for her too. He apologised to everyone, really.
posted on 8/1/15
comment by Chicken - Mr Consistent✔ (U1043)
posted 3 minutes ago
jlou1978
No, three separate high court judges did in detail, in London, and decided he had no right to appeal.
===================
Is his appeal not going ahead then? If there is no appeal, why are the rape group complaining about it being rushed through?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not an appeal as such, the case is being referred to the office that investigates miscarriages of justice.
posted on 8/1/15
2) Basically for the outcome of sleeping with that woman. He still maintains his innocence, but accepts it's been hard for her too. He apologised to everyone, really.
Fair enough.
posted on 8/1/15
Clearly it does look like it's an issue of apology that was made due to being rejected by Oldham.
He should have done this from the start. Can't believe he wouldn't have been advised to do this earlier.
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
Its not an appeal as such, the case is being referred to the office that investigates miscarriages of justice.
===============
I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like an appeal to me.
posted on 8/1/15
s his appeal not going ahead then? If there is no appeal, why are the rape group complaining about it being rushed through?
===============================
The CCRC, The Criminal Cases Review Commission, were not expected to revue the details of another Appeal application till 2017, but have said they will fast track it through, some time in the next 35 weeks, but gave no reason as to why.
This is probably why 'women against rape' have an issue with this decision.
posted on 8/1/15
(not having a go here Spurtle as I feel the same)
Its funny that we are all so cynical, everyone wants him to give an apology, then when he does no-one believes it was genuine.
posted on 8/1/15
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 second ago
(not having a go here Spurtle as I feel the same)
Its funny that we are all so cynical, everyone wants him to give an apology, then when he does no-one believes it was genuine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so true
"If he just apologies, everyone would feel different"
*apologises publicly*
"well, not like that"
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
jlou1978
This is probably why 'women against rape' have an issue with this decision.
=======================
But why should they care? If there is evidence to prove he didnt - they should welcome it. If the evidence still shows him to be guilty - then they should be pleased at that too.
They just want to control the situation.
Women Against Rape Group should mind their own business and leave it to the courts to decide when and if his appeal is heard.
posted on 8/1/15
But why should they care? If there is evidence to prove he didnt - they should welcome it. If the evidence still shows him to be guilty - then they should be pleased at that too.
==================================
The revue isn't necessarily being brought forward due to new evidence as to the innocence of Ched Evans.
If there was new strong evidence to his innocence, a time frame of possibly 35 weeks would never have been mentioned, and he would be looking at a direct appeal imminently.
The CCRC reserve the right to fast track cases, without giving full exposure of the details as to why.
posted on 8/1/15
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
posted on 8/1/15
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 20 seconds ago
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His legal team might have told him not to in case it prejudices his case.
Somethings we can only guess at, lets face it no one on this site has all the facts
posted on 8/1/15
comment by White Wall (U1078)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 20 seconds ago
Edin, it's only because of the timing of it. I mean did he have to come up with this straight after the 3rd or 4th(?) club back out on signing him?
It sounds more disingenuous than it would had he said this right from the off or several weeks earlier
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His legal team might have told him not to in case it prejudices his case.
Somethings we can only guess at, lets face it no one on this site has all the facts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He needs to get a new legal team then if that was their advice.
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/1/15
Manslaughter worse than rape
__________________________________________
It is to the victim and their family.
Page 2 of 5