Its a great campaign like sky and Jamie orchestrated the two stamping incidents hes priceless.
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 48 seconds ago
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but when I got home from the game I put on SSN and there was clip with Henry and he called him 'Stevie G' for me that was cringe.
Just 10 minutes after the match had ended, Sky were already describing Costa's alleged stamps as "Diego's crimes". Pathetic.
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
Jose has done this before. He seems to defend his players from thugish behaviour all the time. I still remember last season when ramirez could have broken el ahmedis leg at villa park then Jose blamedw the ref for sending him off.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
They were both obvious, theres a reason they are rarely seen in the game, 2 in the same match by the same player, come off it.
Listening to that was hilarious where Jose called Brendan out for commenting on our players whilst forgetting to praise his own goal keepers performance. So true. Brendan does like to talk about other teams a lot. He's still young, inexperienced and naive but he'll learn.
The evidence is circumstantial at best. But people are extrapolating culpability from Costa's reputation.
"The evidence is circumstantial at best. But people are extrapolating culpability from Costa's reputation."
Correct
Was a pointless attack on BR it lacked class, what did BR say about Courtois that he won Chelsea the game and is world class? So what if he didn't mention his own GK I can prob go find a 20 interviews where Maureen did exactly the same. Is it now compulsory to praise you own player in that position when praising an opposition player for their match winning performance or something?
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 1 minute ago
They were both obvious, theres a reason they are rarely seen in the game, 2 in the same match by the same player, come off it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's like the ghost of Suarez past.
I bet you defended that bucktoothed vermin when he was doing worse in previous seasons.
Good to see some Liverpool players on the end of some dubious tackles as it's normally them that's dishing them out.
Who know's Jose may get some T shirts printed next
http://h9.abload.de/img/untitled-11cyali.gif
by the way in the link below both happend in the same game and the player was wearing red
https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/the-suarez-stamps-mirallas-distin.49930/
comment by SuperFrank (U15103)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 48 seconds ago
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but when I got home from the game I put on SSN and there was clip with Henry and he called him 'Stevie G' for me that was cringe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It made you cringe 'superfrank'?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by About time I had one of these (U4234)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the damning footage, and widespead acknowledgement from countless ex pros?
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 seconds ago
http://h9.abload.de/img/untitled-11cyali.gif
by the way in the link below both happend in the same game and the player was wearing red
https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/the-suarez-stamps-mirallas-distin.49930/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All should have been straight reds, but it doesn't take away from the fact that the first Costa 'incident' is definately a red too.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by About time I had one of these (U4234)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the damning footage, and widespead acknowledgement from countless ex pros?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no "damning" footage. There is footage of him jumping and coming down on to players' legs... could have been accidental, could have been deliberate. The only person who truly knows is Costa. The speculation by ex pros is meaningless.
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop the press! Manager protects his own players and berates the opposition shocker! EVERY manager does that.
Yes, EVERY manager and fans, when it comes to one of their players, are total hypocrites.
Obviously he meant it, Costa is a clever
No proof though
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/26/everton-martinez-defends-barkley-diving *cough*
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/26/everton-martinez-defends-barkley-diving *cough*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be relevant if Martinez was asking for an opposing teams player to be sent off for diving AFTER wrongly defending Barkley.
Sign in if you want to comment
Mourinho mocks Redknapp
Page 1 of 3
posted on 28/1/15
Its a great campaign like sky and Jamie orchestrated the two stamping incidents hes priceless.
posted on 28/1/15
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
posted on 28/1/15
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 48 seconds ago
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but when I got home from the game I put on SSN and there was clip with Henry and he called him 'Stevie G' for me that was cringe.
posted on 28/1/15
Just 10 minutes after the match had ended, Sky were already describing Costa's alleged stamps as "Diego's crimes". Pathetic.
posted on 28/1/15
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
posted on 28/1/15
Jose has done this before. He seems to defend his players from thugish behaviour all the time. I still remember last season when ramirez could have broken el ahmedis leg at villa park then Jose blamedw the ref for sending him off.
posted on 28/1/15
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
posted on 28/1/15
They were both obvious, theres a reason they are rarely seen in the game, 2 in the same match by the same player, come off it.
posted on 28/1/15
Listening to that was hilarious where Jose called Brendan out for commenting on our players whilst forgetting to praise his own goal keepers performance. So true. Brendan does like to talk about other teams a lot. He's still young, inexperienced and naive but he'll learn.
posted on 28/1/15
The evidence is circumstantial at best. But people are extrapolating culpability from Costa's reputation.
posted on 28/1/15
"The evidence is circumstantial at best. But people are extrapolating culpability from Costa's reputation."
Correct
posted on 28/1/15
Was a pointless attack on BR it lacked class, what did BR say about Courtois that he won Chelsea the game and is world class? So what if he didn't mention his own GK I can prob go find a 20 interviews where Maureen did exactly the same. Is it now compulsory to praise you own player in that position when praising an opposition player for their match winning performance or something?
posted on 28/1/15
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 1 minute ago
They were both obvious, theres a reason they are rarely seen in the game, 2 in the same match by the same player, come off it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's like the ghost of Suarez past.
I bet you defended that bucktoothed vermin when he was doing worse in previous seasons.
Good to see some Liverpool players on the end of some dubious tackles as it's normally them that's dishing them out.
Who know's Jose may get some T shirts printed next
posted on 28/1/15
http://h9.abload.de/img/untitled-11cyali.gif
by the way in the link below both happend in the same game and the player was wearing red
https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/the-suarez-stamps-mirallas-distin.49930/
posted on 28/1/15
comment by SuperFrank (U15103)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Mamadou's Funky Barber (You've been Sakho'd) (U16191)
posted 48 seconds ago
thierry-henry-insists-diego-costa-crossed-the-line-with-stamps-on-emre-can-and-martin-skrtel-during-chelsea-capital-one-cup-victiory-over-Liverpool
Scouser Thierry too I guess
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but when I got home from the game I put on SSN and there was clip with Henry and he called him 'Stevie G' for me that was cringe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It made you cringe 'superfrank'?
posted on 28/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/1/15
comment by About time I had one of these (U4234)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the damning footage, and widespead acknowledgement from countless ex pros?
posted on 28/1/15
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 seconds ago
http://h9.abload.de/img/untitled-11cyali.gif
by the way in the link below both happend in the same game and the player was wearing red
https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/the-suarez-stamps-mirallas-distin.49930/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All should have been straight reds, but it doesn't take away from the fact that the first Costa 'incident' is definately a red too.
posted on 28/1/15
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by About time I had one of these (U4234)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? (U3126)
posted 10 minutes ago
I think any reasonably intelligent observer could see that there was obvious intent to 'stamp' by Costa.
Mourinho comments were simply attempting to prevent his player from a misconduct charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was nothing "obvious" about either of them. Just speculation coloured by Costa's reputation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the damning footage, and widespead acknowledgement from countless ex pros?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no "damning" footage. There is footage of him jumping and coming down on to players' legs... could have been accidental, could have been deliberate. The only person who truly knows is Costa. The speculation by ex pros is meaningless.
posted on 28/1/15
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
posted on 28/1/15
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop the press! Manager protects his own players and berates the opposition shocker! EVERY manager does that.
posted on 28/1/15
Yes, EVERY manager and fans, when it comes to one of their players, are total hypocrites.
posted on 28/1/15
Obviously he meant it, Costa is a clever
No proof though
posted on 28/1/15
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/26/everton-martinez-defends-barkley-diving *cough*
posted on 28/1/15
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charlie (U13806)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mon Dieu - Suarez is football cancer. (U16840)
Have you read where Rodgers defends Suarez in that article.Perhaps he should remember the past before he opens his herpes riddled mouth to say opposing players should be sent off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/26/everton-martinez-defends-barkley-diving *cough*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be relevant if Martinez was asking for an opposing teams player to be sent off for diving AFTER wrongly defending Barkley.
Page 1 of 3