No, I can't see the difference
Idiot.
comment by LegendOsgood (U7946)
posted 9 minutes ago
Violent act to wards a child😂😂😂😂😂
In places like Africa, and not only, such 17year olds are looking after an entire family running farms<perspectivesmiley>
Ball boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah lets compare our moral standards with Africa.
Girls as young as 10 yrs old getting married,girls of 17 yrs old already having 4 kids.Female genital mutilation rife.
Yeah I really look up to those Africans
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 44 seconds ago
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did the ball boy have his birth certificate with him or a T shirt proclaiming his age being 17???.
Hazard didn't know the age of this ball boy so saying he was 17 means nothing.
I'd be really ashamed if I was Hazard and I acted that way against a kid
Violent act he kicked the ball out from underneath the kid. Who looked about 30 too. Violent act. The people on here are starting to be manipulated into the over "politically correct" country we live in
Bales keeps saying he "aimed the kick at the ball boy" Asif the hazard just went and kicked a ball boy when the ball wasn't even there. Love this website.
When you have icons/hero figures like this.Then you know what real violence is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTeqDGeQEY
Oh wow phil Neville how bitter are you? Searching the Internet for that video after chatting absolute rubbish. You must feel a bit of a plonker how bitter your coming across.
And btw if u feel that drogba is playacting there and is embarrassing, that is just what the ball boy done and proves the OPs point. Your very very sad my friend
Phil
Bales point is based on the ballboys age, so of course stating the age is relevant. What if there was a joseph minala esque ball boy, he is 17 as well but looks about 35, so if he kicked the ball under him that would be ok? http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://cameroon-info.net/img/news/joseph-minala_002_ns_600.jpg&imgrefurl=http://cameroon-info.net/stories/0,61595,@,cameroon-joseph-minala-can-resume-career-after-italian-football-association-conf.html&h=275&w=183&tbnid=d133e1cjbta40M:&zoom=1&tbnh=186&tbnw=123&usg=__Kx2N-oxcqVYV88cm9ZKf_cL0cjw=&docid=zuw25wLH_LwHcM&itg=1&ved=0CHwQyjc&ei=XHbSVOaABOS07gbar4CICg
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 20 seconds ago
Phil
Bales point is based on the ballboys age, so of course stating the age is relevant. What if there was a joseph minala esque ball boy, he is 17 as well but looks about 35, so if he kicked the ball under him that would be ok? http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://cameroon-info.net/img/news/joseph-minala_002_ns_600.jpg&imgrefurl=http://cameroon-info.net/stories/0,61595,@,cameroon-joseph-minala-can-resume-career-after-italian-football-association-conf.html&h=275&w=183&tbnid=d133e1cjbta40M:&zoom=1&tbnh=186&tbnw=123&usg=__Kx2N-oxcqVYV88cm9ZKf_cL0cjw=&docid=zuw25wLH_LwHcM&itg=1&ved=0CHwQyjc&ei=XHbSVOaABOS07gbar4CICg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did Hazard know the ball boys age before he did what he did.
A simple yes or no would suffice
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charl... (U13806)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 44 seconds ago
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did the ball boy have his birth certificate with him or a T shirt proclaiming his age being 17???.
Hazard didn't know the age of this ball boy so saying he was 17 means nothing.
I'd be really ashamed if I was Hazard and I acted that way against a kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my goodness is this plank for real ??
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Oh wow phil Neville how bitter are you? Searching the Internet for that video after chatting absolute rubbish. You must feel a bit of a plonker how bitter your coming across.
And btw if u feel that drogba is playacting there and is embarrassing, that is just what the ball boy done and proves the OPs point. Your very very sad my friend
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not bitter,just showing you that if there is 'a campaign' against you as you are crying about then you need to sort out your own players first.
You reap what you sow
Phil,
No he didn't.
But as a ball boy, his ONE job is to to give the ball to a player to keep play flowing. He didn't do that.
Hazard had every right to try and speed things up, and might I add he did so without kicking the ball boy
Hazard should have kicked caaaaant in the nuts.
Chelsea should be champions, the Villa and Sunderland games last year were a disgrace, 0 points should've been 6. We will be champions this season.
This isit still talking rubbish with his 17yr old kid
The lads age isn't relevant.
1. Because he's not a player
2. Because Hazard had no idea how old he was.
This is a pathetic article from an idiot.
Bale/Phil - so you agree with the ball boy actions, he had previously boasted about time wasting on the Twitter before the match.
you're just hypocrites, bet you would be talking a different language if it were you in the receiving end.
Jose just said the campaign thing to create the siege mentality within the club. I do not for one minute believe he thinks it exists.
I do think it has backfired though as refs like any other group of people will look out for each other and in cases where the benefit of the doubt may be given, let us just say, he brought it upon himself
I wouldnt expect a utd fan to understand, but we have been consistently on the wrong end of decisions this year. Costa bookings over nothing, fabregas booked for diving when it was a stonewall pen, costa getting taken out by skrtel just last week was a STONEWALL pen and many more. For a top team we never seem to get the decisions, maybe the home fans not appealing sways the referees decision, as opposed to say anfield where they appeal for anything.
I wouldnt expect a utd fan to understand
-------------------------
I think Utd fans understand it very well, especially the ones that watch us play regularly, they have eyes afterall. It's just not in their interest to publicly admit it.
The decisions that went against us against Liverpool were inexplicable. The penalty decision was as blatant as could be be and how Henderson, Lucas and Skrtel were still on the pitch was something I'll never be able to understand.
Yet all the media wanted to focus on after that was Costa and his "dangerous play" while conveniently ignoring the horrendous and far more dangerous elbowing we saw from Skrtel.
So - how did Rooney get away with banging out that Wigan player a couple of seasons ago?
When you see someone not get retrospective punishment for that and Costa dropped on like a ton of bricks, you're giving some one the excuse to come up with 'conspiracy' theories - and lets face it, whats the reason?
Superb, Chelsea beat Liverpool, that is why Lucas and Henderson staying on the pitch matters less than Costa in terms of news. Malouda scored a screamer via the bar in the cup final v Everton. The ref could not see it. Chelsea won so it hardly got a mention.
The ref said he would have sent Costa off. That may have made a difference. He would not have been brought down for the pen if it happened after and Skrtel would not have him to deal with.
Unless you watch all the teams in the league, you cannot say for example Chelsea get a worse deal than Spurs or Everton. Look at the 2 Liverpool pens v Leicester at Anfield for example.
As for a campaign, how is it supposed to work in reality. Do all the journalists get together and agree to write bad things .Some like Rob Beasley are Chelsea fans. I am sure he would 'grass' if that were the case.
Sign in if you want to comment
Campaign against Chelsea?
Page 2 of 2
posted on 4/2/15
No, I can't see the difference
Idiot.
posted on 4/2/15
comment by LegendOsgood (U7946)
posted 9 minutes ago
Violent act to wards a child😂😂😂😂😂
In places like Africa, and not only, such 17year olds are looking after an entire family running farms<perspectivesmiley>
Ball boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah lets compare our moral standards with Africa.
Girls as young as 10 yrs old getting married,girls of 17 yrs old already having 4 kids.Female genital mutilation rife.
Yeah I really look up to those Africans
posted on 4/2/15
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
posted on 4/2/15
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 44 seconds ago
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did the ball boy have his birth certificate with him or a T shirt proclaiming his age being 17???.
Hazard didn't know the age of this ball boy so saying he was 17 means nothing.
I'd be really ashamed if I was Hazard and I acted that way against a kid
posted on 4/2/15
Violent act he kicked the ball out from underneath the kid. Who looked about 30 too. Violent act. The people on here are starting to be manipulated into the over "politically correct" country we live in
posted on 4/2/15
Bales keeps saying he "aimed the kick at the ball boy" Asif the hazard just went and kicked a ball boy when the ball wasn't even there. Love this website.
posted on 4/2/15
When you have icons/hero figures like this.Then you know what real violence is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRTeqDGeQEY
posted on 4/2/15
Oh wow phil Neville how bitter are you? Searching the Internet for that video after chatting absolute rubbish. You must feel a bit of a plonker how bitter your coming across.
And btw if u feel that drogba is playacting there and is embarrassing, that is just what the ball boy done and proves the OPs point. Your very very sad my friend
posted on 4/2/15
Phil
Bales point is based on the ballboys age, so of course stating the age is relevant. What if there was a joseph minala esque ball boy, he is 17 as well but looks about 35, so if he kicked the ball under him that would be ok? http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://cameroon-info.net/img/news/joseph-minala_002_ns_600.jpg&imgrefurl=http://cameroon-info.net/stories/0,61595,@,cameroon-joseph-minala-can-resume-career-after-italian-football-association-conf.html&h=275&w=183&tbnid=d133e1cjbta40M:&zoom=1&tbnh=186&tbnw=123&usg=__Kx2N-oxcqVYV88cm9ZKf_cL0cjw=&docid=zuw25wLH_LwHcM&itg=1&ved=0CHwQyjc&ei=XHbSVOaABOS07gbar4CICg
posted on 4/2/15
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 20 seconds ago
Phil
Bales point is based on the ballboys age, so of course stating the age is relevant. What if there was a joseph minala esque ball boy, he is 17 as well but looks about 35, so if he kicked the ball under him that would be ok? http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://cameroon-info.net/img/news/joseph-minala_002_ns_600.jpg&imgrefurl=http://cameroon-info.net/stories/0,61595,@,cameroon-joseph-minala-can-resume-career-after-italian-football-association-conf.html&h=275&w=183&tbnid=d133e1cjbta40M:&zoom=1&tbnh=186&tbnw=123&usg=__Kx2N-oxcqVYV88cm9ZKf_cL0cjw=&docid=zuw25wLH_LwHcM&itg=1&ved=0CHwQyjc&ei=XHbSVOaABOS07gbar4CICg
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did Hazard know the ball boys age before he did what he did.
A simple yes or no would suffice
posted on 4/2/15
comment by phil neville has three left feet-je suis charl... (U13806)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by -blueformostoftheway- (U8980)
posted 44 seconds ago
Bales, you say it was a violent act aimed at a kid.
If that had been a 17 yo player on the ground and hazard kicked the ball out from underneath him, or whether it was a 30 year old, the reaction should not be different. The fact that he's a ballboy makes no difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did the ball boy have his birth certificate with him or a T shirt proclaiming his age being 17???.
Hazard didn't know the age of this ball boy so saying he was 17 means nothing.
I'd be really ashamed if I was Hazard and I acted that way against a kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my goodness is this plank for real ??
posted on 4/2/15
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Oh wow phil Neville how bitter are you? Searching the Internet for that video after chatting absolute rubbish. You must feel a bit of a plonker how bitter your coming across.
And btw if u feel that drogba is playacting there and is embarrassing, that is just what the ball boy done and proves the OPs point. Your very very sad my friend
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not bitter,just showing you that if there is 'a campaign' against you as you are crying about then you need to sort out your own players first.
You reap what you sow
posted on 4/2/15
Phil,
No he didn't.
But as a ball boy, his ONE job is to to give the ball to a player to keep play flowing. He didn't do that.
Hazard had every right to try and speed things up, and might I add he did so without kicking the ball boy
posted on 4/2/15
Hazard should have kicked caaaaant in the nuts.
posted on 4/2/15
Chelsea should be champions, the Villa and Sunderland games last year were a disgrace, 0 points should've been 6. We will be champions this season.
posted on 4/2/15
This isit still talking rubbish with his 17yr old kid
posted on 4/2/15
The lads age isn't relevant.
1. Because he's not a player
2. Because Hazard had no idea how old he was.
This is a pathetic article from an idiot.
posted on 4/2/15
Bale/Phil - so you agree with the ball boy actions, he had previously boasted about time wasting on the Twitter before the match.
you're just hypocrites, bet you would be talking a different language if it were you in the receiving end.
posted on 5/2/15
Jose just said the campaign thing to create the siege mentality within the club. I do not for one minute believe he thinks it exists.
I do think it has backfired though as refs like any other group of people will look out for each other and in cases where the benefit of the doubt may be given, let us just say, he brought it upon himself
posted on 5/2/15
I wouldnt expect a utd fan to understand, but we have been consistently on the wrong end of decisions this year. Costa bookings over nothing, fabregas booked for diving when it was a stonewall pen, costa getting taken out by skrtel just last week was a STONEWALL pen and many more. For a top team we never seem to get the decisions, maybe the home fans not appealing sways the referees decision, as opposed to say anfield where they appeal for anything.
posted on 5/2/15
I wouldnt expect a utd fan to understand
-------------------------
I think Utd fans understand it very well, especially the ones that watch us play regularly, they have eyes afterall. It's just not in their interest to publicly admit it.
The decisions that went against us against Liverpool were inexplicable. The penalty decision was as blatant as could be be and how Henderson, Lucas and Skrtel were still on the pitch was something I'll never be able to understand.
Yet all the media wanted to focus on after that was Costa and his "dangerous play" while conveniently ignoring the horrendous and far more dangerous elbowing we saw from Skrtel.
posted on 5/2/15
So - how did Rooney get away with banging out that Wigan player a couple of seasons ago?
When you see someone not get retrospective punishment for that and Costa dropped on like a ton of bricks, you're giving some one the excuse to come up with 'conspiracy' theories - and lets face it, whats the reason?
posted on 5/2/15
Superb, Chelsea beat Liverpool, that is why Lucas and Henderson staying on the pitch matters less than Costa in terms of news. Malouda scored a screamer via the bar in the cup final v Everton. The ref could not see it. Chelsea won so it hardly got a mention.
The ref said he would have sent Costa off. That may have made a difference. He would not have been brought down for the pen if it happened after and Skrtel would not have him to deal with.
Unless you watch all the teams in the league, you cannot say for example Chelsea get a worse deal than Spurs or Everton. Look at the 2 Liverpool pens v Leicester at Anfield for example.
As for a campaign, how is it supposed to work in reality. Do all the journalists get together and agree to write bad things .Some like Rob Beasley are Chelsea fans. I am sure he would 'grass' if that were the case.
Page 2 of 2