Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Chronic
The bit about him saying that Spurs may lose hardly surprises me, but the bit about him saying Kane is basically a one season wonder smacks of envy. He would be jizzing in his pants if it were Sterling or Sturridge with 30 goals.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by ®åρtor✡ (U1071)
posted 35 minutes ago
We usually win when Lawro predicts a defeat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Next he'll be thinking he's got the top six in the exact correct order or something.
Robbing_Hoody
Yeh really biased of him saying Liverpool are going to lose again for just the third time in 31 games.
http://www.myfootballfacts.com/Mark_Lawrenson_Predictions_2014-15.html
TBH
He's got the first 6 places correct, and two of the current bottom 3.
Well done Lawro lol
Benny
To be fair, that was not that hard, 95 per cent of the country would have those predictions correct. The top half a dozen and bottom two or three are not that hard to predict.
Good old Lawro
That fool Lawro would be lauding Kane as the second coming of Maradona if he played for his beloved Bin Dippers.
The only reason this Buffoon has predicted a defeat for Pool is by way of some sort of reverse psychology in a game the Mousers must win.
Merson has gone for a 1-1 draw.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/15205/9785415/mersons-predictions-chelsea-and-manchester-city-backed-for-wins
To be honest Burnley have a good chance of beating Tottenham as they will see this as a cup final more so then recent cup game against spurs. Leicester really should have not lost but Spurs seem to win 3-2 4-3 2-1 any game by 1 goal it seems last few seasons sneaking the wins in.
Merson and Lawro have Man City and Chelsea winning nearly every game apart from drawing each other I believe and some other games.
Of course Kane is not a one season wonder....he has class written all over him. But to think that he is worth £100m is also ridiculous. He is not in the class of Bale Messi or Ronaldo....YET.
To be fair, that was not that hard, 95 per cent of the country would have those predictions correct.
==================
You'd have had Southampton 6th and Spurs outside the European places would you sandy?
Just shhhh. He predicts each game as they come. Most would have City and Chelsea winning each game on the face of it but no one would say they'd go unbeaten the whole season either. That's how it works.
Johnhoppy
I think there was only one clown, Rodney Marsh, who said he was worth £100 million. not sure why Lawro even mentioned it.
Robbin
Only Lawro would predict Spurs to lose pretty well every game they play, and Liverpool to hardly lose a game. So he doesn't just predict each game as they come. No way would he predict Liverpool to lose at Burnley, you know it, and I know it. His clear bias for and against two teams is there for all to see.
No he predicted us to win. We did.
Robbing_Hoody - putting the bureaucracy into footballism since 1979
No he predicted us to win. We did.
So why would he predict Spurs to lose, seeing as they have already played Burnley three times this season, winning two and drawing one. Not saying Burnley cannot win, but Lawro always plays the safe option. So if any of the other top teams had been playing Burnley, no way would he have gone for a Burnley win.
I think because Burnley keep getting results at home against big teams. If they win 2-1 you're going to look silly. I must have missed your articles on him when he predicted a Spurs win.
lawros predictions are pretty decent on balance
Robbing_Hoody - putting the bureaucracy into footballism since 1979
I think because Burnley keep getting results at home against big teams.
Burnley have won five out of 30 games all season, so why would he predict them to win. They have a 6/1 chance of not winning.
Sign in if you want to comment
Surprise, surprise Lawro has
Page 1 of 3
posted on 3/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/4/15
21 years old
posted on 3/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/4/15
Benny
posted on 3/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/4/15
Chronic
The bit about him saying that Spurs may lose hardly surprises me, but the bit about him saying Kane is basically a one season wonder smacks of envy. He would be jizzing in his pants if it were Sterling or Sturridge with 30 goals.
posted on 3/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/4/15
comment by ®åρtor✡ (U1071)
posted 35 minutes ago
We usually win when Lawro predicts a defeat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
posted on 3/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/4/15
Next he'll be thinking he's got the top six in the exact correct order or something.
posted on 3/4/15
Robbing_Hoody
Yeh really biased of him saying Liverpool are going to lose again for just the third time in 31 games.
posted on 3/4/15
http://www.myfootballfacts.com/Mark_Lawrenson_Predictions_2014-15.html
TBH
He's got the first 6 places correct, and two of the current bottom 3.
Well done Lawro lol
posted on 3/4/15
Benny
To be fair, that was not that hard, 95 per cent of the country would have those predictions correct. The top half a dozen and bottom two or three are not that hard to predict.
posted on 3/4/15
Good old Lawro
That fool Lawro would be lauding Kane as the second coming of Maradona if he played for his beloved Bin Dippers.
The only reason this Buffoon has predicted a defeat for Pool is by way of some sort of reverse psychology in a game the Mousers must win.
posted on 3/4/15
Merson has gone for a 1-1 draw.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/15205/9785415/mersons-predictions-chelsea-and-manchester-city-backed-for-wins
To be honest Burnley have a good chance of beating Tottenham as they will see this as a cup final more so then recent cup game against spurs. Leicester really should have not lost but Spurs seem to win 3-2 4-3 2-1 any game by 1 goal it seems last few seasons sneaking the wins in.
posted on 3/4/15
Merson and Lawro have Man City and Chelsea winning nearly every game apart from drawing each other I believe and some other games.
posted on 3/4/15
Of course Kane is not a one season wonder....he has class written all over him. But to think that he is worth £100m is also ridiculous. He is not in the class of Bale Messi or Ronaldo....YET.
posted on 4/4/15
To be fair, that was not that hard, 95 per cent of the country would have those predictions correct.
==================
You'd have had Southampton 6th and Spurs outside the European places would you sandy?
Just shhhh. He predicts each game as they come. Most would have City and Chelsea winning each game on the face of it but no one would say they'd go unbeaten the whole season either. That's how it works.
posted on 4/4/15
Johnhoppy
I think there was only one clown, Rodney Marsh, who said he was worth £100 million. not sure why Lawro even mentioned it.
posted on 4/4/15
Robbin
Only Lawro would predict Spurs to lose pretty well every game they play, and Liverpool to hardly lose a game. So he doesn't just predict each game as they come. No way would he predict Liverpool to lose at Burnley, you know it, and I know it. His clear bias for and against two teams is there for all to see.
posted on 4/4/15
No he predicted us to win. We did.
posted on 4/4/15
Robbing_Hoody - putting the bureaucracy into footballism since 1979
No he predicted us to win. We did.
So why would he predict Spurs to lose, seeing as they have already played Burnley three times this season, winning two and drawing one. Not saying Burnley cannot win, but Lawro always plays the safe option. So if any of the other top teams had been playing Burnley, no way would he have gone for a Burnley win.
posted on 4/4/15
I think because Burnley keep getting results at home against big teams. If they win 2-1 you're going to look silly. I must have missed your articles on him when he predicted a Spurs win.
posted on 4/4/15
lawros predictions are pretty decent on balance
posted on 4/4/15
Robbing_Hoody - putting the bureaucracy into footballism since 1979
I think because Burnley keep getting results at home against big teams.
Burnley have won five out of 30 games all season, so why would he predict them to win. They have a 6/1 chance of not winning.
Page 1 of 3