Your username isn't witty.
comment by LocoLiverpool (U18018)
posted 36 seconds ago
Your username isn't witty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. Its ironic.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
You sure managed to get a lot of lazy stereotypes into one post there!
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
Nope, £25M is not enough, Liverpool spent £20M a few years ago on Henderson and he is miles behind Wilshere.
comment by Maestro. (U8867)
posted 3 seconds ago
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would take Milner over Wilshere. He puts in a shift; down to earth; has two very good feet and will play anywhere. Also he isn't a crock.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
£40M is the bare minimum for England's best midfielder. Even then I'd have to think about it.
comment by TikiTakaFootball49 (U17636)
posted 33 seconds ago
Nope, £25M is not enough, Liverpool spent £20M a few years ago on Henderson and he is miles behind Wilshere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. Maybe Jack has better close control but other than that Jack is living on reputation that effects his game. Henderson isnt trying to be a super left footed Iniesta. He is willing to just be a donkey and sit tight.
comment by WittyUsername (U20435)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Maestro. (U8867)
posted 3 seconds ago
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would take Milner over Wilshere. He puts in a shift; down to earth; has two very good feet and will play anywhere. Also he isn't a crock.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, although Jack is much younger and does have some potential.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
don't sell him, get him fit and get him playing.
coq-wilshere
ramsey
This may be the midfield 3 for the next few years.
Thank god you are not in charge. Sell Ozil and Jack and promote Zelly
Give Wilsh at least another season.
Exceptionally talented, will never fulfil his potential unless he gets over his injury issues.
I agree, although Jack is much younger and does have some potential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential arthritis.
--------------
You are promoting Zelalem on what basis??
Another poor season for the lad.
We don't need to sell anyone.
Jack will be our Cazorla replacement when Santi goes.
Obviously not as good, but a good one nonetheless.
Wilshere is very talented indeed, if you cant see that you have no idea about football. unfortunately, his injury prone and it seems to be consistent, if that's the case then we should consider getting rid of him, if it can be sorted out, then NO fooking way!
It's a big mistake to say sell Wilshere when Cazorla is aging and he is the best replacement in a deep-lying midfielder. He takes on players similiar to Cazorla and has fantastic long range passes as him. I would hope he improves his defensive duties and toughen up in some challenge sitauations because he would be perfect alongside Coquelin next season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAufMwjEUxY
Wilshere will be world class and started the season off bright people keep forgetting that.
Would've sold Ozil
Your judgement is terrible sorry mate.
We just need to define a new role for him, Artetas replacement as deep-lying playmaker next to a DM/Coq imo
Sign in if you want to comment
Wil Shere stay?
Page 1 of 2
posted on 8/4/15
Your username isn't witty.
posted on 8/4/15
comment by LocoLiverpool (U18018)
posted 36 seconds ago
Your username isn't witty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. Its ironic.
posted on 8/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/4/15
You sure managed to get a lot of lazy stereotypes into one post there!
posted on 8/4/15
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
posted on 8/4/15
Nope, £25M is not enough, Liverpool spent £20M a few years ago on Henderson and he is miles behind Wilshere.
posted on 8/4/15
comment by Maestro. (U8867)
posted 3 seconds ago
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would take Milner over Wilshere. He puts in a shift; down to earth; has two very good feet and will play anywhere. Also he isn't a crock.
posted on 8/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/4/15
£40M is the bare minimum for England's best midfielder. Even then I'd have to think about it.
posted on 8/4/15
comment by TikiTakaFootball49 (U17636)
posted 33 seconds ago
Nope, £25M is not enough, Liverpool spent £20M a few years ago on Henderson and he is miles behind Wilshere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. Maybe Jack has better close control but other than that Jack is living on reputation that effects his game. Henderson isnt trying to be a super left footed Iniesta. He is willing to just be a donkey and sit tight.
posted on 8/4/15
comment by WittyUsername (U20435)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Maestro. (U8867)
posted 3 seconds ago
City NEED English players. If they want Jack, you should make them pay.
He should look at all the other English players City have had over the past few years, and ask himself if it's worth it? Milner (who they're shipping out) and Hart are the only ones, I think who have had decent game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would take Milner over Wilshere. He puts in a shift; down to earth; has two very good feet and will play anywhere. Also he isn't a crock.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree, although Jack is much younger and does have some potential.
posted on 8/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/4/15
don't sell him, get him fit and get him playing.
coq-wilshere
ramsey
This may be the midfield 3 for the next few years.
posted on 8/4/15
Thank god you are not in charge. Sell Ozil and Jack and promote Zelly
posted on 8/4/15
Give Wilsh at least another season.
Exceptionally talented, will never fulfil his potential unless he gets over his injury issues.
posted on 8/4/15
I agree, although Jack is much younger and does have some potential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential arthritis.
--------------
posted on 8/4/15
You are promoting Zelalem on what basis??
Another poor season for the lad.
posted on 8/4/15
Go away wum
posted on 8/4/15
Sport Gunther
posted on 8/4/15
We don't need to sell anyone.
posted on 8/4/15
Jack will be our Cazorla replacement when Santi goes.
Obviously not as good, but a good one nonetheless.
posted on 8/4/15
Wilshere is very talented indeed, if you cant see that you have no idea about football. unfortunately, his injury prone and it seems to be consistent, if that's the case then we should consider getting rid of him, if it can be sorted out, then NO fooking way!
posted on 8/4/15
It's a big mistake to say sell Wilshere when Cazorla is aging and he is the best replacement in a deep-lying midfielder. He takes on players similiar to Cazorla and has fantastic long range passes as him. I would hope he improves his defensive duties and toughen up in some challenge sitauations because he would be perfect alongside Coquelin next season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAufMwjEUxY
posted on 8/4/15
Wilshere will be world class and started the season off bright people keep forgetting that.
Would've sold Ozil
Your judgement is terrible sorry mate.
We just need to define a new role for him, Artetas replacement as deep-lying playmaker next to a DM/Coq imo
Page 1 of 2