he is a good player but he wants an exit.
Wouldn't swap him for anyone though.
I've said it before, Sterling is the second coming of Nathan Dyer. Trash player.
Sterling reminds me of gervinho
Always beats his man but end product is as bad
Rarely scores, hardly assists, just a pace merchant and typical English winger.
He really isn't that good just quick tad bit of skill but he strikes the ball weakly and terribly, he's weak and non-evident in big games this season.
Ox has turned up against the likes of Bayern, Milan, Brazil etc... no way would I sacrifice his development for Sterling's we have the better player and Theo at least brings the goals Raheem won't provide for years if ever
He's a good player, he's only 20 or something like that ffs. But no way would I sign him for the figures quoted or swap him for Theo.
Good player but over hyped and priced, a better player than Ox though, don't rate him particularly.
Yeah but I've seen people say how he can become one of the worlds best or how his stats match Messi at his age.
He'll do well to ever be elite, he's technically average. Ox is miles better for me.
Just another Lennon/SWP we won't speak of him in 5 years
Ox is miles better The droog
One of our biggest game players terrorised Alaba last year, Shaw at OT much stronger, just as quick, technically better.
Raheem has just had better opportunity to develop and showcase his talents as there's weaker competition at Lpool but that was changing this season.
Ox is one of our most important players now we're lost on the right without him
I put the two (Ox/Sterling) roughly on par. Sterling slightly better on the ball but Ox by far the 'smarter' player. Would always pick Ox over Sterling though as his head will always fit through the stadium doors.
I just find it side-splittingly HILARIOUS that some out there think either of them is better than Walcott.
There ain't 'alf some proper jokers in this world.
Yeah he isn't very good. He's like an Aaron Lennon but with a bit more workrate.
If Ox can develop Theo's end product as he's a lot better than the latter was at 21 then it'd be very one sided and Theo's use will be severely lessened.
Still, as long as Alexis is giving us the goals we used to rely on Theo for then I like Ox as first choice on the right all round he's a lot better and helps the full-back more.
Theo should become an impact sub, but one used more often I must say
I certainly would not swap Ox for Sterling.
A winger with double figures in goals, one of the top assisters, top chance creators (top 5 in the league statistically), and top dribblers (behind only Hazard and Alexis) and just 20-years-old is just like Lennon? Is there no limits to your clueless stupidity?
"I certainly would not swap Ox for Sterling."
Sterling has shown a lot more influence and responsibility in his career than Ox and is vastly more decisive for his team. He's a better player than Ox and that's easily demonstrable. Take the blinkers off.
Sheriff as I said everything goes through him at Liverpool, typical your clueless self would be backing a rival senselessly
Put Ox in Liverpool and he'd be one of the best in thw prem, fair play to Rodgers who has even made the likes of Henderson look top class at times.
Sterling will be found out at a top club where consistently playing at the highest level, did nothing in the CL this year. Whilst Ox ruined Bayern both legs even Pep was praised him.
Ox has immense potential and only injuries have stopped him just like Jack but Wenger is nurturing him more this year. Ox is better
Oh and guess who else is in the top 5 dribbles list you speak of? That's right.
You're clueless and know little about the game get in your lane
On the contrary, the performance of our top players allows Ox hide without responsibility. When we lose, we blame the likes of Ozil, Santi, Alexis and Giroud. When Liverpool lose, they blame Sterling who is a star. Ox has it far easier than Sterling. It's just moronic to be having such a go at a 20-year-old - a facking 20-year-old - who has been arguably Liverpool's best player since Suarez left.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well when you hear things like how ' he's the best 19 year old I've ever seen' or how he will become the worlds best or even Liverpool fans assuming they're entitled to at least £50m for him it does grate a little yes because he's not as good as perceived noticable when you watch him over a full game (my brothers are both United and L'pool fans) so I catch a lot of their games.
Ox has less pressure but in turn gets less opportunity to develop as his minutes are more limited due to much stronger competition, it'd be completely the same if they switched teams.
Ox being a bigger talent isn't a slant on Raheem either as I rate Ox's potential very highly he has everything to get to the top, most importantly attitude and genuine love for the game.
Nailed on starter now which nobody would've predicted once we signed Alexis, Danny and Campbell returned, as well as Theo getting fit.... and Ozil starting out wide in the WC and earlier this season.
He has fought off heavy competition whilst Sterling had it easier as it's also traditional to bring through a lad from the academy often.
Some even argue Ibe is better, you need to watch him closely to see how much of a fraud he is
What is funny about my first sentence WB2?
Are you telling me Theo has been clinical from the moment he arrived and was a nailed on starter for years ahead of Nasri, Arshavin, Hleb? Surely no....
Theo was even getting booed until his brace at Spurs Home in 11-12, so please don't act like he hasn't come a long way.
Ox has a distance to travel too but he's MUCH better as an all round footballer than Theo was at that age and on the ball is better now.
You need to just accept Alexis is a MASSIVE upgrade and Theo isnt a regular anymore go and argue this with Wenger if you can't accept this.
Blasting Ozil but bigging up limited players like Theo Clown!
Ox and Sterling will both be better than Theo
Alexis is world class
Theo is good
That's the reality you need to face mate.
This article isn't primarily about Theo anyway stop bringing him up on every occasion and just tweet him for his number so you can $uck him off on a daily basis
Also how long does Theo have left at the top of his game, he relies on pace which normally drops around 29.. and that's not counting all the injuries he's had.
Sign in if you want to comment
Raheem Wright-Phillips
Page 1 of 2
posted on 19/4/15
he is a good player but he wants an exit.
Wouldn't swap him for anyone though.
posted on 19/4/15
I've said it before, Sterling is the second coming of Nathan Dyer. Trash player.
posted on 19/4/15
Sterling reminds me of gervinho
Always beats his man but end product is as bad
posted on 19/4/15
Rarely scores, hardly assists, just a pace merchant and typical English winger.
posted on 19/4/15
He really isn't that good just quick tad bit of skill but he strikes the ball weakly and terribly, he's weak and non-evident in big games this season.
Ox has turned up against the likes of Bayern, Milan, Brazil etc... no way would I sacrifice his development for Sterling's we have the better player and Theo at least brings the goals Raheem won't provide for years if ever
posted on 19/4/15
He's a good player, he's only 20 or something like that ffs. But no way would I sign him for the figures quoted or swap him for Theo.
posted on 19/4/15
Good player but over hyped and priced, a better player than Ox though, don't rate him particularly.
posted on 19/4/15
Yeah but I've seen people say how he can become one of the worlds best or how his stats match Messi at his age.
He'll do well to ever be elite, he's technically average. Ox is miles better for me.
Just another Lennon/SWP we won't speak of him in 5 years
posted on 19/4/15
Ox is miles better The droog
One of our biggest game players terrorised Alaba last year, Shaw at OT much stronger, just as quick, technically better.
Raheem has just had better opportunity to develop and showcase his talents as there's weaker competition at Lpool but that was changing this season.
Ox is one of our most important players now we're lost on the right without him
posted on 19/4/15
I put the two (Ox/Sterling) roughly on par. Sterling slightly better on the ball but Ox by far the 'smarter' player. Would always pick Ox over Sterling though as his head will always fit through the stadium doors.
I just find it side-splittingly HILARIOUS that some out there think either of them is better than Walcott.
There ain't 'alf some proper jokers in this world.
posted on 19/4/15
l@l
posted on 19/4/15
Yeah he isn't very good. He's like an Aaron Lennon but with a bit more workrate.
posted on 19/4/15
If Ox can develop Theo's end product as he's a lot better than the latter was at 21 then it'd be very one sided and Theo's use will be severely lessened.
Still, as long as Alexis is giving us the goals we used to rely on Theo for then I like Ox as first choice on the right all round he's a lot better and helps the full-back more.
Theo should become an impact sub, but one used more often I must say
posted on 19/4/15
I certainly would not swap Ox for Sterling.
posted on 19/4/15
A winger with double figures in goals, one of the top assisters, top chance creators (top 5 in the league statistically), and top dribblers (behind only Hazard and Alexis) and just 20-years-old is just like Lennon? Is there no limits to your clueless stupidity?
posted on 19/4/15
"I certainly would not swap Ox for Sterling."
Sterling has shown a lot more influence and responsibility in his career than Ox and is vastly more decisive for his team. He's a better player than Ox and that's easily demonstrable. Take the blinkers off.
posted on 19/4/15
Sheriff as I said everything goes through him at Liverpool, typical your clueless self would be backing a rival senselessly
Put Ox in Liverpool and he'd be one of the best in thw prem, fair play to Rodgers who has even made the likes of Henderson look top class at times.
Sterling will be found out at a top club where consistently playing at the highest level, did nothing in the CL this year. Whilst Ox ruined Bayern both legs even Pep was praised him.
Ox has immense potential and only injuries have stopped him just like Jack but Wenger is nurturing him more this year. Ox is better
Oh and guess who else is in the top 5 dribbles list you speak of? That's right.
You're clueless and know little about the game get in your lane
posted on 19/4/15
On the contrary, the performance of our top players allows Ox hide without responsibility. When we lose, we blame the likes of Ozil, Santi, Alexis and Giroud. When Liverpool lose, they blame Sterling who is a star. Ox has it far easier than Sterling. It's just moronic to be having such a go at a 20-year-old - a facking 20-year-old - who has been arguably Liverpool's best player since Suarez left.
posted on 19/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/4/15
Well when you hear things like how ' he's the best 19 year old I've ever seen' or how he will become the worlds best or even Liverpool fans assuming they're entitled to at least £50m for him it does grate a little yes because he's not as good as perceived noticable when you watch him over a full game (my brothers are both United and L'pool fans) so I catch a lot of their games.
Ox has less pressure but in turn gets less opportunity to develop as his minutes are more limited due to much stronger competition, it'd be completely the same if they switched teams.
Ox being a bigger talent isn't a slant on Raheem either as I rate Ox's potential very highly he has everything to get to the top, most importantly attitude and genuine love for the game.
Nailed on starter now which nobody would've predicted once we signed Alexis, Danny and Campbell returned, as well as Theo getting fit.... and Ozil starting out wide in the WC and earlier this season.
He has fought off heavy competition whilst Sterling had it easier as it's also traditional to bring through a lad from the academy often.
Some even argue Ibe is better, you need to watch him closely to see how much of a fraud he is
posted on 19/4/15
What is funny about my first sentence WB2?
Are you telling me Theo has been clinical from the moment he arrived and was a nailed on starter for years ahead of Nasri, Arshavin, Hleb? Surely no....
Theo was even getting booed until his brace at Spurs Home in 11-12, so please don't act like he hasn't come a long way.
Ox has a distance to travel too but he's MUCH better as an all round footballer than Theo was at that age and on the ball is better now.
You need to just accept Alexis is a MASSIVE upgrade and Theo isnt a regular anymore go and argue this with Wenger if you can't accept this.
Blasting Ozil but bigging up limited players like Theo Clown!
posted on 19/4/15
Ox and Sterling will both be better than Theo
posted on 19/4/15
Alexis is world class
Theo is good
That's the reality you need to face mate.
This article isn't primarily about Theo anyway stop bringing him up on every occasion and just tweet him for his number so you can $uck him off on a daily basis
posted on 19/4/15
Also how long does Theo have left at the top of his game, he relies on pace which normally drops around 29.. and that's not counting all the injuries he's had.
Page 1 of 2