Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Francis Coquelele (U7889)
posted 8 seconds ago
Well one thing is for sure. Coutinho should not be nominated if Cazorla isn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who gives a fek?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Tactical voting from Chelsea players and also United may swing it
Tactical voting from Chelsea players and also United may swing it
-------------------------------------------------
In who's favour
personally If i was an English footballer I would most likely vote for Kane rather than a Belgium.
comment by Ledley King of Kings (U7659)
posted 52 seconds ago
personally If i was an English footballer I would most likely vote for Kane rather than a Belgium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Terry has already voted for Coutinho
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Francis Coquelele (U7889)
posted 1 minute ago
If Coutinho is nominated then why isn't Eriksen. Both cams who hide their inability to influence the general play through the odd long range goal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has Coutinho slept with your wife or something?
difference is kane has carried an average team(your words not mine)to europa. hazard has carried an average team(second half of season, not first) to the title.
Also football is more than just goals. Kane has been great and his pace and hold up play have been a nice suprise to see(from a football fans perspective) but hazard is head and shoulders poty OP. you just had to see what he done at white hart lane in the 5-3. Only chelsea player to really turn up that day.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Hazard has been the best player in England this season by miles. The guy's an unbelievable footballer. Kane's age or the English driven media sensationalism is irrelevant. Hazard has been far better. Top dribbler in the league (by a chasm), top chance creator. For all the talk about Chelsea's star-studded team, Hazard is the one that terrifies and unbalances the opposition.
You can make arguments for both. I don't mind seeing Kane win YPOTY and Hazard win the main one. They have both probably been the stand out players.
The argument that Hazard is in a better team is a bit of a non-sequitur because he still does what he does regardless of the players he has around him, which is terrorising defences, setting up chances with good runs, and scoring a few goals. If it was a tap in merchant having got great service all season, who scored tonnes of goals I'd get the 'being in a better team' argument.
I do think that they should limit the YPOTY to players of Kane's age or younger though. Silly to have Hazard in there when he's 24 and is pretty experienced already. As it is you've got most of the same players in both categories, so what's even the point of having a YPOTY?
difference is kane has carried an average team(your words not mine)to europa. hazard has carried an average team(second half of season, not first) to the title.
-----------
Spurs are always in the Europa though so hes carried them nowhere. If he got them in the CL that would be a different story.
Think hes done well but should be young player of hte year.
true. you get my point boss. gotta be hazard
Hazard clearly been the best player of the season
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Galvation lies within (U10415)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hazard hasn't even been Chelsea's best player this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
Kane is player of the season
Page 1 of 5
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
I agree
posted on 20/4/15
Agree.
posted on 20/4/15
agree 100%
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
comment by Francis Coquelele (U7889)
posted 8 seconds ago
Well one thing is for sure. Coutinho should not be nominated if Cazorla isn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who gives a fek?
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
Tactical voting from Chelsea players and also United may swing it
posted on 20/4/15
Tactical voting from Chelsea players and also United may swing it
-------------------------------------------------
In who's favour
posted on 20/4/15
personally If i was an English footballer I would most likely vote for Kane rather than a Belgium.
posted on 20/4/15
comment by Ledley King of Kings (U7659)
posted 52 seconds ago
personally If i was an English footballer I would most likely vote for Kane rather than a Belgium.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Terry has already voted for Coutinho
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
comment by Francis Coquelele (U7889)
posted 1 minute ago
If Coutinho is nominated then why isn't Eriksen. Both cams who hide their inability to influence the general play through the odd long range goal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has Coutinho slept with your wife or something?
posted on 20/4/15
difference is kane has carried an average team(your words not mine)to europa. hazard has carried an average team(second half of season, not first) to the title.
Also football is more than just goals. Kane has been great and his pace and hold up play have been a nice suprise to see(from a football fans perspective) but hazard is head and shoulders poty OP. you just had to see what he done at white hart lane in the 5-3. Only chelsea player to really turn up that day.
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
Hazard has been the best player in England this season by miles. The guy's an unbelievable footballer. Kane's age or the English driven media sensationalism is irrelevant. Hazard has been far better. Top dribbler in the league (by a chasm), top chance creator. For all the talk about Chelsea's star-studded team, Hazard is the one that terrifies and unbalances the opposition.
posted on 20/4/15
You can make arguments for both. I don't mind seeing Kane win YPOTY and Hazard win the main one. They have both probably been the stand out players.
The argument that Hazard is in a better team is a bit of a non-sequitur because he still does what he does regardless of the players he has around him, which is terrorising defences, setting up chances with good runs, and scoring a few goals. If it was a tap in merchant having got great service all season, who scored tonnes of goals I'd get the 'being in a better team' argument.
I do think that they should limit the YPOTY to players of Kane's age or younger though. Silly to have Hazard in there when he's 24 and is pretty experienced already. As it is you've got most of the same players in both categories, so what's even the point of having a YPOTY?
posted on 20/4/15
difference is kane has carried an average team(your words not mine)to europa. hazard has carried an average team(second half of season, not first) to the title.
-----------
Spurs are always in the Europa though so hes carried them nowhere. If he got them in the CL that would be a different story.
Think hes done well but should be young player of hte year.
posted on 20/4/15
true. you get my point boss. gotta be hazard
posted on 20/4/15
Hazard clearly been the best player of the season
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
posted on 20/4/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 20/4/15
comment by Galvation lies within (U10415)
posted 3 minutes ago
Hazard hasn't even been Chelsea's best player this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 5