Transfers are fine as they are

Take away first choice then should have to swap a similar player

I don't mind first choice just font agree with forced to stay once someone better comes in. Surely should be allowed to sell if I think brum would start him

The first choice is for players like Sanchez, Costa ect, you don't think they agree to go to clubs where they'll be back up?

I still don't understand what needs explaining, first choice is self explanatory, regular game time sure is as well and a third of the season is surely not difficult to comprehend

Ok then so how much should the fine be if the player doesn't start when not injured

There isn't a fine, you give him what was offered or he goes back without you getting your money or whatever you paid back, it's always been like that, there's no reason to change.

He has to start every game when fit for a third of a season. If he doesn't start then has to go back

Ok agreed

Obviously first choice players don't ever start every game, that would be silly, but 90% of the games.

Ok thanks boss who am I playing vs wolves next week

It's your decision to sign the player not mine, if you don't think he's good enough to be first choice don't take him

My argument is no player irl dictates the managers team sheet and shouldn't on here. A rule I am completely against

I will sign if I think he's good enough and I'll play if I think he's good enough. Take the player off me if it's not enough I don't care

So you think the reallŷ top players join clubs where they're not going to be first choice? I don't.

It's simple you do that you'll just be told players won't join.

It's a rule tha keeps the lower teams in with a fighting chance, sure if you were at the other end you'd be more than happy to see that an injury might actually weaken your opponent

I think they join with the promise of regularly starting games which is why I'm not against regular game time (as long as amount of games is specified) I don't think they can and would be able to dictate a managers starting eleven though

I believe players like Sanchez don't just join settling for regular game time I'm afraid

I agree with LSTD

I dont believe managers like Wenger, Mourinho, Van Gaal, Ancelotti get told who to play im afraid

Players like sanchez will want the promise that they will be one of the main players but the manager can still drop them if they see fit.

this rule shows we are not allowed to drop them

it would be very unlikely that they'd be dropped without getting a proper chance, a third of our season is hardly a long time

theres also a lot higher movement of players in this league than real life, regular game time is easy to get through and allowed teams to have Aguero, Falcao, Van Persie as their attacking options when at their peak, not something that makes the league interesting imo if the top teams have 3-4 class players in every position, which used to be the case and why they were finishing 20+ points ahead of even 5th place

at the end of the day you're very unlikely to want to drop a player like Costa or Sanchez

Have three relegation positions next season to make it more exciting as usually one space is taken up by at least one club who have management issues

Suggestions welcome for another week.

1. Kick Wilshere out

2. Go back to the old form of relegation, the teams who go down will lose some of their players.

comment by LSTD - Cesc Fabregas has Chelsea DNA (U2708)
posted 24 seconds ago
1. Kick Wilshere out

2. Go back to the old form of relegation, the teams who go down will lose some of their players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agree with number 2 but people think they should be given rewards for getting relegated

form of punishment is needed to make people actually care about not getting relegated

In the old league I agreed, now it would be ridiculous. The gap would be far too great. And when we've g ur vacancies sounds ridiculous when no one wants the small teams or wants away asap

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 5 minutes ago
In the old league I agreed, now it would be ridiculous. The gap would be far too great. And when we've g ur vacancies sounds ridiculous when no one wants the small teams or wants away asap
----------------------------------------------------------------------

i dont think my original idea of no choice on what your new team name is would create a gap....