I love me tennis, so i'm all good for a chat, but there's only so much time a mans got.
although admittedly i'm not as up to date as i had been i still catch up when i can...
just had a look at not606 and 606v2.
not606 tennis forum is pretty dead like this but 606v2 has moderately active forum
Cheers De Gea thanks for the info.
By the way Zah the last time I checked the score was 2 sets to 1 to djokovic and three all in the fourth hardly what I would describe as a "thrashing", you are obviously my friend just a wum??
Murray I am not a WUM but its obvious I do not like Djokovic!Thats all but momentum matters and Murray was kind of getting in good flow and reading the game better than first two sets!
If you are again going to call me a WUM then I will delete your comment if you do not give a proper reason.
Momentum and rhythm is important and a new day offers a tired player an opportunity to refresh and charge their batteries and then come back to finish the job!
What's your problem its not a thrashing as it stands and if u had watched the game and know anything about tennis u would know that your remark not mine is false??
Losing 2 sets 6-3 is a thrashing!End of discussion!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Not in tennis it isn't. 6-3 is very often a single break of serve deciding the outcome. If you think losing a set by a single break of serve is a thrashing you may want to re-evaluate your knowledge of the game.
Zah losing 6-3, 6-3 isn't a thrashing either, 6-0, 6-0 is, e.g last set in Miami and Aussie Open but not here I'm afraid, end of discussion.
Well said hardcore, exactly, he is still in the match but will be extremely tough, although Murray broke twice at beginning in Miami only to lose his own serve and had opportunities today early in first set, difference being Andy knows if he can get an early break tomorrow it could be a winner takes all final set, and Murray could then go for it in that set knowing there wont be another 3 long slog sets to follow.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
To be honest Guvnor I don't question Murray' mentality at all, it used to be awful but not anymore it's much better, I'd much rather question Djokovic's gamesmanship, the reason why Djokovic does this is because Murray's mentality and his ability is so good he has to find some way of distracting Murray, as it's Murray who is unsettling him not the other way round.
if the only reason murray can't win is because of novaks mind games then his mentality is dreadful.
other top players do this so they need to get over it
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
End of rivalry now between Djoker & Nadal?
Page 2 of 2
posted on 5/6/15
I love me tennis, so i'm all good for a chat, but there's only so much time a mans got.
although admittedly i'm not as up to date as i had been i still catch up when i can...
posted on 5/6/15
just had a look at not606 and 606v2.
not606 tennis forum is pretty dead like this but 606v2 has moderately active forum
posted on 5/6/15
Cheers De Gea thanks for the info.
posted on 5/6/15
Zah, what opinion??
posted on 5/6/15
By the way Zah the last time I checked the score was 2 sets to 1 to djokovic and three all in the fourth hardly what I would describe as a "thrashing", you are obviously my friend just a wum??
posted on 5/6/15
Murray I am not a WUM but its obvious I do not like Djokovic!Thats all but momentum matters and Murray was kind of getting in good flow and reading the game better than first two sets!
If you are again going to call me a WUM then I will delete your comment if you do not give a proper reason.
Momentum and rhythm is important and a new day offers a tired player an opportunity to refresh and charge their batteries and then come back to finish the job!
posted on 5/6/15
What's your problem its not a thrashing as it stands and if u had watched the game and know anything about tennis u would know that your remark not mine is false??
posted on 6/6/15
Losing 2 sets 6-3 is a thrashing!End of discussion!
posted on 6/6/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/15
Not in tennis it isn't. 6-3 is very often a single break of serve deciding the outcome. If you think losing a set by a single break of serve is a thrashing you may want to re-evaluate your knowledge of the game.
posted on 6/6/15
Zah losing 6-3, 6-3 isn't a thrashing either, 6-0, 6-0 is, e.g last set in Miami and Aussie Open but not here I'm afraid, end of discussion.
posted on 6/6/15
Well said hardcore, exactly, he is still in the match but will be extremely tough, although Murray broke twice at beginning in Miami only to lose his own serve and had opportunities today early in first set, difference being Andy knows if he can get an early break tomorrow it could be a winner takes all final set, and Murray could then go for it in that set knowing there wont be another 3 long slog sets to follow.
posted on 6/6/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 6/6/15
To be honest Guvnor I don't question Murray' mentality at all, it used to be awful but not anymore it's much better, I'd much rather question Djokovic's gamesmanship, the reason why Djokovic does this is because Murray's mentality and his ability is so good he has to find some way of distracting Murray, as it's Murray who is unsettling him not the other way round.
posted on 6/6/15
if the only reason murray can't win is because of novaks mind games then his mentality is dreadful.
other top players do this so they need to get over it
posted on 6/6/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/6/15
WAW!!!!
Page 2 of 2