or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 13 comments are related to an article called:

stadium?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 29/8/11

henry said he'll listen to the fans.
majority want stanley park.

posted on 29/8/11

Henry is fudging the issue and the fans come out with pearls like "he's an astute business man" and "his plans are way better than h+g's".....what plans?

posted on 29/8/11

John H has asked the following question, in so many words: "we have a stadium of 45,000. Everyone wants one with a capacity of 60,000. Are we expected to pay £300M for 15,000 extra capacity?" Its not an easy question to answer, is it? Answers please m.gummidge, JimmyTheRed

posted on 29/8/11

stadium?
by LFCLFCLFCLFC (U9782)
29 August 2011
Comment on this Article

Just wondering if anyone knows about the stadium situation. A few weeks back i read that the club were supposed to make a decision before the end of September on whether or not they would build a new stadium on Stanley park, however nothing has been mentioned so far. Any news?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Just out of interest, what month is it?

posted on 29/8/11

Where does £300m come from?
Portugal managed to build 6 new stadims for the euro's for £750m.

posted on 29/8/11

W.g I am quoting John directly. Actually, I thought the price was on the low side, bearing in mind the cost of the Emirates. While our costs would be less, I would say that £300M would be a minimum. JimmyTheRed

posted on 29/8/11

Stadium of light: £23m
Cost of extra stand £7m
Total £30m for a 48k capacity.

Now i know your'e talking minimum 60k capacity but £300m sounds ridiculous.

posted on 29/8/11

wembley cost 800m O.O

posted on 29/8/11

Wembley cost a fair bit more but need not have.

posted on 29/8/11

I'm only quoting the owner w.g, please don't shoot me JimmyTheRed

posted on 29/8/11

w.gummidge (U1449)
____________________
Are you kidding me? Don't tell me you don't know what inflation is. 300 is the average cost of a proper 60k stadium. You only have to look at the cost of wembley and emirates and these were before the recession.

posted on 29/8/11

Gummidge.

Filtered.

Jackass

posted on 29/8/11

I'd rather see us expand Anfield to 60,000 but Henry says the red tape involved in doing that would keep us in limbo for years. I also understand that if Anfield was to be made 60,000 capacity then there would be no possibility to expand further. Its a difficult one for sure, and I think they are doing the correct thing in taking their time over the decision.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment