Hang on, isn't he a better manager than the double-winning Pellegrini?
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 50 seconds ago
Hang on, isn't he a better manager than the double-winning Pellegrini?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2nd coming of Shankly
They've obviously got someone lined up and want to nip in ahead of Chelsea before they sack the Deranged One.
He was a name banded about as a successor to Pellegrini last year. Needless to say, I'm glad with stayed with Pellegrini.
City have a history of going through managers like a knife through butter, but it's one of the (many) things that impresses me about our owners. They do give a manager time. over 7 years they've been at the club now and our owners have sacked only 1 manager whom they have themselves appointed.
History Boys v1 will go for Klopp, History Boys V2 will continue with Hoofball. Chelsea are faced with losing face by sacking the moany one or losing face by losing games. Meanwhile City will go about their business quietly winning games with any luck.
Ripley, I was arguing with a rag at work last week who said
"How many managers have you been through in the last 4 years"?
I pointed out that were on our 2nd whilst United are on their 4th.
I loved his work. Its a tragedy.
I think buying players without a plan is the new way to shexhy football, ideally about 10 strikers. It's just he was a man before his time.
In tech terms, you could say that when Brenda sold Suraez it was like selling his iPhone and replacing it with a Nokia 3280, a Casio 1Mp camera, a Sony Walkman and a compass with no needle and expected them all to work in perfect harmony.
Boris, That rag that he's having a perception meltdown. What you said to him - no more needs to be said!!!
I'm supposed to be off tommorrow but as I've endured endless stick for the last week I may just show my face.
I admire your commitment to the cause.
If City go on to win the title this season under Pellegrini how will the many City fans that have been recently calling for his head feel? Clearly, the owners are not going to sack a manager that wins his second title during the relatively short period he has been at the club? Is that deemed to be failure? I know the owners are keen for the manager to improve on the team's showing in the CL but would another failure in that regard result in him being sacked even if he won the League title? Surely not.
Anyone think the scousers have mistaken Klopp for Ricky Tomlinson...
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Rodgers gone
Page 1 of 1
posted on 4/10/15
Nooooooooooo
posted on 4/10/15
Hang on, isn't he a better manager than the double-winning Pellegrini?
posted on 4/10/15
comment by Boris 'Inky' Gibson (U5901)
posted 50 seconds ago
Hang on, isn't he a better manager than the double-winning Pellegrini?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2nd coming of Shankly
posted on 4/10/15
They've obviously got someone lined up and want to nip in ahead of Chelsea before they sack the Deranged One.
posted on 4/10/15
He was a name banded about as a successor to Pellegrini last year. Needless to say, I'm glad with stayed with Pellegrini.
City have a history of going through managers like a knife through butter, but it's one of the (many) things that impresses me about our owners. They do give a manager time. over 7 years they've been at the club now and our owners have sacked only 1 manager whom they have themselves appointed.
posted on 4/10/15
History Boys v1 will go for Klopp, History Boys V2 will continue with Hoofball. Chelsea are faced with losing face by sacking the moany one or losing face by losing games. Meanwhile City will go about their business quietly winning games with any luck.
posted on 4/10/15
Ripley, I was arguing with a rag at work last week who said
"How many managers have you been through in the last 4 years"?
I pointed out that were on our 2nd whilst United are on their 4th.
posted on 4/10/15
I loved his work. Its a tragedy.
posted on 4/10/15
I think buying players without a plan is the new way to shexhy football, ideally about 10 strikers. It's just he was a man before his time.
posted on 4/10/15
In tech terms, you could say that when Brenda sold Suraez it was like selling his iPhone and replacing it with a Nokia 3280, a Casio 1Mp camera, a Sony Walkman and a compass with no needle and expected them all to work in perfect harmony.
posted on 4/10/15
Boris, That rag that he's having a perception meltdown. What you said to him - no more needs to be said!!!
posted on 4/10/15
I'm supposed to be off tommorrow but as I've endured endless stick for the last week I may just show my face.
posted on 5/10/15
I admire your commitment to the cause.
posted on 5/10/15
If City go on to win the title this season under Pellegrini how will the many City fans that have been recently calling for his head feel? Clearly, the owners are not going to sack a manager that wins his second title during the relatively short period he has been at the club? Is that deemed to be failure? I know the owners are keen for the manager to improve on the team's showing in the CL but would another failure in that regard result in him being sacked even if he won the League title? Surely not.
posted on 5/10/15
Anyone think the scousers have mistaken Klopp for Ricky Tomlinson...
posted on 5/10/15
no ....Mike Basset
Page 1 of 1