I wonder if the could still have the vote on it but not announce the out come till after the court considers it
Timmy?
Its only an interim interim decision, until the Petition can be fully considered by the Court.
If the court decides to block it it could get interesting for the SFA in their fight against the fat man, hope they have deep pockets.
<Its only an interim interim decision, until the Petition can be fully co>
Glazing over already.
On the odd occasion I've trouble sleeping I read Ashely/King threads.
Mike Ashley wins
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mike-ashley-blocks-attempts-rangers-6885695
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Mike Ashley wins
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mike-ashley-blocks-attempts-rangers-6885695
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually he hasn't , the court want time to review it
Timmy you would be better off not reading the DR
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 4 minutes ago
you seem pleased timmy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy hate King and loves Ashley
54 and counting
http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/notice-to-shareholders/
seems to me that res 11 would have brought us in line with SFA requirements
Disappointing for all in Scottish football I would have thought.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
even if it ultimately fails I think we have already done enough to show the SFA we are at least trying to meet requirements
If MASH do attempt to force through further controls then the SFA will have to deal with them directly.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
MASH don't report to the SFA though, nor do the SFA have any jurisdiction over them.
They don't have jurisdiction over anyone they are a football association .
They have a set of rules that every club must adhere to, if Ashley wants to put his fat stumpy fingers on the board he will have a hard job doing it, hopefully once the court of session review res 11 we can get on with the board and the fans wishes and cut the fat kuunts ties further
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
they already had a go direct
I think they will continue if he pushes particularly given Rangers have made it pretty clear where they stand.
Now whether the SFA rule is even legal who knows,
I guess when they get round to fully considering the petition we will find out.
<Timmy hate King and love Ashley>
What gives with the 'kemo sabe' chat?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 3 minutes ago
<Timmy hate King and love Ashley>
What gives with the 'kemo sabe' chat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Auto correct Quinn
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
How extremely phuddy of you!
Sign in if you want to comment
Ashley...
Page 1 of 2
posted on 23/11/15
I wonder if the could still have the vote on it but not announce the out come till after the court considers it
Timmy?
posted on 23/11/15
Its only an interim interim decision, until the Petition can be fully considered by the Court.
If the court decides to block it it could get interesting for the SFA in their fight against the fat man, hope they have deep pockets.
posted on 23/11/15
<Its only an interim interim decision, until the Petition can be fully co>
Glazing over already.
On the odd occasion I've trouble sleeping I read Ashely/King threads.
posted on 23/11/15
Quinny
posted on 23/11/15
Mike Ashley wins
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mike-ashley-blocks-attempts-rangers-6885695
posted on 23/11/15
you seem pleased timmy?
posted on 23/11/15
comment by timmy (U14278)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
Mike Ashley wins
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mike-ashley-blocks-attempts-rangers-6885695
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually he hasn't , the court want time to review it
Timmy you would be better off not reading the DR
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 4 minutes ago
you seem pleased timmy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy hate King and loves Ashley
54 and counting
posted on 23/11/15
http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/notice-to-shareholders/
posted on 23/11/15
seems to me that res 11 would have brought us in line with SFA requirements
Disappointing for all in Scottish football I would have thought.
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
even if it ultimately fails I think we have already done enough to show the SFA we are at least trying to meet requirements
If MASH do attempt to force through further controls then the SFA will have to deal with them directly.
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
MASH don't report to the SFA though, nor do the SFA have any jurisdiction over them.
They don't have jurisdiction over anyone they are a football association .
They have a set of rules that every club must adhere to, if Ashley wants to put his fat stumpy fingers on the board he will have a hard job doing it, hopefully once the court of session review res 11 we can get on with the board and the fans wishes and cut the fat kuunts ties further
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
they already had a go direct
I think they will continue if he pushes particularly given Rangers have made it pretty clear where they stand.
Now whether the SFA rule is even legal who knows,
I guess when they get round to fully considering the petition we will find out.
posted on 23/11/15
<Timmy hate King and love Ashley>
What gives with the 'kemo sabe' chat?
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 3 minutes ago
<Timmy hate King and love Ashley>
What gives with the 'kemo sabe' chat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Auto correct Quinn
posted on 23/11/15
For you Quinn
*s
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/11/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/11/15
How extremely phuddy of you!
Page 1 of 2