3 excellent performances with Lamela
1 excellent performance without him.
Don > chicken
And theoretically I did watch the game as in watched the 1st half. 2nd half I missed due to work. The game was recorded and I watched the rest after. The only game I have missed this season live is Anderlecht home so your getting mixed up chicken. Wrong again
Don,
Infact although westham was the best performance, Mancity was no doubt the harder game and probably the best result of the season. Lamela was by far the best player on that day.
===============
I have never doubted Lamela was MoTM against City – and I was the first to comment, on the first article created, directly after the City game to praise Lamela. But 1 MoTM performance per 2-3 seasons isn’t enough. I expect, even some of the poorest players in the league will have won MoTM at some point.
Man City was arguably the better result – but in reality it was a game of 2 halves performance wise, whereas we bossed the West Ham game for every minute bar the 87th.
Yes and I am admitting westham was the best performance. But you can't sit there and make a case for Lamela not starting due to that performance then put your fingers in your ears when I mention 3 excellent performances where Lamela played and was heavily involved
Don
3 excellent performances with Lamela
==============
Where the hell are you getting 3 from?
Best performance of the season - No Lamela.
End of.
look at these two plonkers
look at these two plonkers
=============
3 plonkers since Chronic arrived
Chicken..... Bornmouth, arsenal and mancity were 3 excellent performances don't you agree? So 1+1+1 = 3 don't it? Unless my maths is wrong. Lamela played in all 3. He also scored in 2.
I could never out plonk you and don though chicken
Lamela has been much improved and very much deserves his place in the starting x1
Looks like chickster the only one that don't agree?
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
chickens quite like straws I think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't like baskets evidently.
Don_
Chicken..... Bornmouth, arsenal and mancity were 3 excellent performances don't you agree? So 1+1+1 = 3 don't it? Unless my maths is wrong. Lamela played in all 3. He also scored in 2.
==============
So if we have a good result (in your mind) this means Lamela was "excellent"?
Lamela has had 1 excellent game - that game was back in September.
Our best performance was Sunday just gone - that team (which didn't include Lamela) should start against Chelsea.
that team (which didn't include Lamela) should start against Chelsea.
===============
Obviously bar Alli who is suspended. But Lamela should not be replacing Alli - Mason should.
Sign in if you want to comment
Teams named
Page 3 of 3
posted on 27/11/15
3 excellent performances with Lamela
1 excellent performance without him.
Don > chicken
posted on 27/11/15
And theoretically I did watch the game as in watched the 1st half. 2nd half I missed due to work. The game was recorded and I watched the rest after. The only game I have missed this season live is Anderlecht home so your getting mixed up chicken. Wrong again
posted on 27/11/15
Don,
Infact although westham was the best performance, Mancity was no doubt the harder game and probably the best result of the season. Lamela was by far the best player on that day.
===============
I have never doubted Lamela was MoTM against City – and I was the first to comment, on the first article created, directly after the City game to praise Lamela. But 1 MoTM performance per 2-3 seasons isn’t enough. I expect, even some of the poorest players in the league will have won MoTM at some point.
Man City was arguably the better result – but in reality it was a game of 2 halves performance wise, whereas we bossed the West Ham game for every minute bar the 87th.
posted on 27/11/15
Yes and I am admitting westham was the best performance. But you can't sit there and make a case for Lamela not starting due to that performance then put your fingers in your ears when I mention 3 excellent performances where Lamela played and was heavily involved
posted on 27/11/15
Don
3 excellent performances with Lamela
==============
Where the hell are you getting 3 from?
Best performance of the season - No Lamela.
End of.
posted on 27/11/15
look at these two plonkers
posted on 27/11/15
look at these two plonkers
=============
3 plonkers since Chronic arrived
posted on 27/11/15
Chicken..... Bornmouth, arsenal and mancity were 3 excellent performances don't you agree? So 1+1+1 = 3 don't it? Unless my maths is wrong. Lamela played in all 3. He also scored in 2.
posted on 27/11/15
I could never out plonk you and don though chicken
posted on 27/11/15
Lamela has been much improved and very much deserves his place in the starting x1
posted on 27/11/15
Henge
posted on 27/11/15
hengy is correct
posted on 27/11/15
Looks like chickster the only one that don't agree?
posted on 27/11/15
comment by Chronic (U3423)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
chickens quite like straws I think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They don't like baskets evidently.
posted on 27/11/15
Don_
Chicken..... Bornmouth, arsenal and mancity were 3 excellent performances don't you agree? So 1+1+1 = 3 don't it? Unless my maths is wrong. Lamela played in all 3. He also scored in 2.
==============
So if we have a good result (in your mind) this means Lamela was "excellent"?
Lamela has had 1 excellent game - that game was back in September.
Our best performance was Sunday just gone - that team (which didn't include Lamela) should start against Chelsea.
posted on 27/11/15
that team (which didn't include Lamela) should start against Chelsea.
===============
Obviously bar Alli who is suspended. But Lamela should not be replacing Alli - Mason should.
Page 3 of 3