Dunno about points for the actual predictions. Far easier to get a 3 set game right than an 11 set game.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
You just predict the scores of the matches listed.
Obviously anything after the 1st round may not happen, but the draw works out that they will if everything goes to form.
Bonus points for 9 darter?
=====
Predict a player or a round? Or a player in a round?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Thinking maybe go back to the Fantasy Football style?
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Thinking maybe go back to the Fantasy Football style?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ye how did that go last year?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
That was the Premier League RAP. Don't think we can do that format!!!
Check out the updated article and find improvements.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Any other things I can give points for?
Point distribution look alright? The Grand Slam worked out really well, imo.
Too difficult to add average for chosen player?
Wildcards double points?
Tournament average should be easy.
Wildcards double points?
=======
The jeopardy of the wildcard is whether to take a higher ranked player, who is more likely to go further, or go for the lower ranked who is worth more points.
Giving the wildcard double points I dont think will have that risk, everyone will take the higher ranking player I would guess.
Thinking I should drop Peter Wright down and just have 3 star men. Cannot see anyone going for him in this format.
I preferred it when we just predicted the scores of every match.
comment by Maяcо (U1329)
posted 5 seconds ago
I preferred it when we just predicted the scores of every match.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We never did for the Worlds, tbf. The schedule is too congested, can never hope everyone gets in their predictions - especially as many are away for christmas.
Nah. Used to be name the last 16, last 8, last 4, and winner.
Points related to the seeding of the player with each round carrying more points.
For example if Taylor, as #1 seed, got to the last 16 you got 1 point, 5 for the quarters, 10 for the semis and 50 for the final.
That sounds familiar. Me n thee spotted the flaw in that system.
Haha, yeah. We beat the system
There are no flaws in this... probably.
Sign in if you want to comment
2016 PDC World Darts Championship
Page 1 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 1/12/15
Dunno about points for the actual predictions. Far easier to get a 3 set game right than an 11 set game.
posted on 1/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/12/15
You just predict the scores of the matches listed.
Obviously anything after the 1st round may not happen, but the draw works out that they will if everything goes to form.
posted on 1/12/15
Bonus points for 9 darter?
=====
Predict a player or a round? Or a player in a round?
posted on 1/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/12/15
Thinking maybe go back to the Fantasy Football style?
posted on 1/12/15
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Thinking maybe go back to the Fantasy Football style?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ye how did that go last year?
posted on 1/12/15
Very well didn't it?
posted on 1/12/15
Ah, you won didn't you
posted on 1/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/12/15
That was the Premier League RAP. Don't think we can do that format!!!
Check out the updated article and find improvements.
posted on 1/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/12/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 1/12/15
Any other things I can give points for?
Point distribution look alright? The Grand Slam worked out really well, imo.
posted on 1/12/15
Too difficult to add average for chosen player?
Wildcards double points?
posted on 1/12/15
Tournament average should be easy.
posted on 1/12/15
Wildcards double points?
=======
The jeopardy of the wildcard is whether to take a higher ranked player, who is more likely to go further, or go for the lower ranked who is worth more points.
Giving the wildcard double points I dont think will have that risk, everyone will take the higher ranking player I would guess.
posted on 1/12/15
Thinking I should drop Peter Wright down and just have 3 star men. Cannot see anyone going for him in this format.
posted on 1/12/15
I preferred it when we just predicted the scores of every match.
posted on 1/12/15
comment by Maяcо (U1329)
posted 5 seconds ago
I preferred it when we just predicted the scores of every match.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We never did for the Worlds, tbf. The schedule is too congested, can never hope everyone gets in their predictions - especially as many are away for christmas.
posted on 1/12/15
Yeah we did didn't we?
posted on 1/12/15
Nah. Used to be name the last 16, last 8, last 4, and winner.
Points related to the seeding of the player with each round carrying more points.
For example if Taylor, as #1 seed, got to the last 16 you got 1 point, 5 for the quarters, 10 for the semis and 50 for the final.
posted on 1/12/15
That sounds familiar. Me n thee spotted the flaw in that system.
posted on 1/12/15
Haha, yeah. We beat the system
There are no flaws in this... probably.
posted on 2/12/15
Like this
Page 1 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10