It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
comment by JSPC - MUDD makes me throb with desire (U2958)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Komakino (U7809)
posted 2 minutes ago
How much longer has LVG got on his contract?
------------------
End of next season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should align nicely with Pep about to sign a 1 year extension at Bayern
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By which point I would imagine LVG has improved the squad, bedded in some youth and put us in a position for the next manager to come in a win trophies (if he doesn't manage this himself).
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 11 minutes ago
It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A craftier mind than mine might think the Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign.
I wonder if Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign?
Or am I just craftier than everyone else on here?
crafty minds say "the Giggs"
comment by Robb - Save us Carlo (U20351)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
You all miss the point of why I did this article.
It was a riposte to MuDD who did the same article yesterday but didn't include many of the quotes in the OP here.
......................
Good one Robb. Pull the other one.
MUDd put a link to his article with all Rio's quotes on it.
Why didn't you?
Because you have this non ending anti LVG agenda.
Everyone knows it Robb. I would say that you are not fooling anyone, but there are one or two posters on here who you do fool.
VC my good man. MuDD framed the entire article as a pro-LVG article with barely any of the negative quotes in his OP.
Funny that.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 15 minutes ago
I wonder if Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign?
Or am I just craftier than everyone else on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be of most benefit for Giggs not to be in charge of any players he previously played with imo.
comment by JSPC - MUDD makes me throb with desire (U2958)
posted 10 minutes ago
crafty minds say "the Giggs"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
b.u.g.g.e.r
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 38 minutes ago
It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brendans performance in the league last season and at the start of this one helped them somewhat
comment by Robb - Save us Carlo (U20351)
posted 11 minutes ago
VC my good man. MuDD framed the entire article as a pro-LVG article with barely any of the negative quotes in his OP.
............
But he put the link up with them on it. Not sure what your issue is, other than petty childishness.
Obviously Rio will be hesitant to lay into United too harshly. His comments are not exactly a blanket of approval of LVG's methods.
Robb,
This is embarrassing mate.
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
comment by Mamba - Sterling, what's the score? (U1282) (U13041)
posted 5 minutes ago
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
because it's robb (!)
comment by Mamba - Sterling, what's the score? (U1282) (U13041)
posted 9 minutes ago
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
...............
The OP hasn't got slated. He was just asked why he omitted some of Rio's comments.
I admire your willingness to defend Robb, though Mamba.
Let's not argue about the meaning of the word 'slated'. Perhaps I can say he has got stick for it instead? Can you answer the question now? Surely you know what I mean to say, don't you?
Mamba
I have answered your question. All you had to do was read the bit after I said he hasn't got slated.
Read and understand son, read and understand.
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
...............
Indeed. Exactly how I read it.
MUDd, I assume, going by his thread title saw common sense and Robb saw it as LVG being slated.
I didn't see LVG being slated, but I did agree with a lot of what Rio said.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
...............
Indeed. Exactly how I read it.
MUDd, I assume, going by his thread title saw common sense and Robb saw it as LVG being slated.
I didn't see LVG being slated, but I did agree with a lot of what Rio said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, you miss the point. MuDD read the article and framed it as Rio vouching for LVG's methods and making out that we were also boring under SAF at the end.
I purposely framed it another way.
Both sides were not as black and white as each poster made out but that's what I was aiming for. A riposte to MuDD to show that anyone can twist things to suit their agenda.
MuDD has as much an agenda about LVG as I do.
I purposely framed it another way.
..........
Why? Are you ret arded?
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 59 minutes ago
Mamba
I have answered your question. All you had to do was read the bit after I said he hasn't got slated.
Read and understand son, read and understand.
-----
No you didn't lol. If you did it should be easy enough to copy and paste your answer to my question. I'll wait.
Again, you miss the point. MuDD read the article and framed it as Rio vouching for LVG's methods and making out that we were also boring under SAF at the end.
I purposely framed it another way.
Both sides were not as black and white as each poster made out but that's what I was aiming for. A riposte to MuDD to show that anyone can twist things to suit their agenda.
MuDD has as much an agenda about LVG as I do.
-----
Spot on Robb. They accuse you of having an agenda but the only reason this article doesn't sit well is because it disagrees with their own agenda. MUDD's article is ok because it agrees with their agenda. Simple as. These small minds on this forum are too gobby.
Mamba trying to stir the shizit
LOL
Sign in if you want to comment
Rio slates LVG
Page 2 of 3
posted on 2/12/15
It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
posted on 2/12/15
comment by JSPC - MUDD makes me throb with desire (U2958)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Komakino (U7809)
posted 2 minutes ago
How much longer has LVG got on his contract?
------------------
End of next season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should align nicely with Pep about to sign a 1 year extension at Bayern
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By which point I would imagine LVG has improved the squad, bedded in some youth and put us in a position for the next manager to come in a win trophies (if he doesn't manage this himself).
posted on 2/12/15
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 11 minutes ago
It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A craftier mind than mine might think the Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign.
posted on 2/12/15
I wonder if Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign?
Or am I just craftier than everyone else on here?
posted on 2/12/15
crafty minds say "the Giggs"
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Robb - Save us Carlo (U20351)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
You all miss the point of why I did this article.
It was a riposte to MuDD who did the same article yesterday but didn't include many of the quotes in the OP here.
......................
Good one Robb. Pull the other one.
MUDd put a link to his article with all Rio's quotes on it.
Why didn't you?
Because you have this non ending anti LVG agenda.
Everyone knows it Robb. I would say that you are not fooling anyone, but there are one or two posters on here who you do fool.
posted on 2/12/15
VC my good man. MuDD framed the entire article as a pro-LVG article with barely any of the negative quotes in his OP.
Funny that.
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 15 minutes ago
I wonder if Giggs has been on the phone to his mates to start a media campaign?
Or am I just craftier than everyone else on here?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It would be of most benefit for Giggs not to be in charge of any players he previously played with imo.
posted on 2/12/15
comment by JSPC - MUDD makes me throb with desire (U2958)
posted 10 minutes ago
crafty minds say "the Giggs"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
b.u.g.g.e.r
posted on 2/12/15
comment by LQ (U6305)
posted 38 minutes ago
It is a bit Liverpool when this many ex players come out attacking a manager, just like the end of Brendan's tenure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brendans performance in the league last season and at the start of this one helped them somewhat
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Robb - Save us Carlo (U20351)
posted 11 minutes ago
VC my good man. MuDD framed the entire article as a pro-LVG article with barely any of the negative quotes in his OP.
............
But he put the link up with them on it. Not sure what your issue is, other than petty childishness.
posted on 2/12/15
Obviously Rio will be hesitant to lay into United too harshly. His comments are not exactly a blanket of approval of LVG's methods.
posted on 2/12/15
Robb,
This is embarrassing mate.
posted on 2/12/15
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Mamba - Sterling, what's the score? (U1282) (U13041)
posted 5 minutes ago
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
because it's robb (!)
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Mamba - Sterling, what's the score? (U1282) (U13041)
posted 9 minutes ago
Someone made a similar article with a pro-LVG slant on it and no one had a pop at him. This one goes the other way and the OP gets slated. Why?
...............
The OP hasn't got slated. He was just asked why he omitted some of Rio's comments.
I admire your willingness to defend Robb, though Mamba.
posted on 2/12/15
Let's not argue about the meaning of the word 'slated'. Perhaps I can say he has got stick for it instead? Can you answer the question now? Surely you know what I mean to say, don't you?
posted on 2/12/15
Mamba
I have answered your question. All you had to do was read the bit after I said he hasn't got slated.
Read and understand son, read and understand.
posted on 2/12/15
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
posted on 2/12/15
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
...............
Indeed. Exactly how I read it.
MUDd, I assume, going by his thread title saw common sense and Robb saw it as LVG being slated.
I didn't see LVG being slated, but I did agree with a lot of what Rio said.
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
I thought the article was neutral. Neither for against LvG, just comments as he sees things.
...............
Indeed. Exactly how I read it.
MUDd, I assume, going by his thread title saw common sense and Robb saw it as LVG being slated.
I didn't see LVG being slated, but I did agree with a lot of what Rio said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, you miss the point. MuDD read the article and framed it as Rio vouching for LVG's methods and making out that we were also boring under SAF at the end.
I purposely framed it another way.
Both sides were not as black and white as each poster made out but that's what I was aiming for. A riposte to MuDD to show that anyone can twist things to suit their agenda.
MuDD has as much an agenda about LVG as I do.
posted on 2/12/15
I purposely framed it another way.
..........
Why? Are you ret arded?
posted on 2/12/15
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 59 minutes ago
Mamba
I have answered your question. All you had to do was read the bit after I said he hasn't got slated.
Read and understand son, read and understand.
-----
No you didn't lol. If you did it should be easy enough to copy and paste your answer to my question. I'll wait.
posted on 2/12/15
Again, you miss the point. MuDD read the article and framed it as Rio vouching for LVG's methods and making out that we were also boring under SAF at the end.
I purposely framed it another way.
Both sides were not as black and white as each poster made out but that's what I was aiming for. A riposte to MuDD to show that anyone can twist things to suit their agenda.
MuDD has as much an agenda about LVG as I do.
-----
Spot on Robb. They accuse you of having an agenda but the only reason this article doesn't sit well is because it disagrees with their own agenda. MUDD's article is ok because it agrees with their agenda. Simple as. These small minds on this forum are too gobby.
posted on 2/12/15
Mamba trying to stir the shizit
LOL
Page 2 of 3