comment by aries22 (U1203)
Poor effort by I Love Butt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsie, I was simply highlighting an article that appeared today. Hadn't intended to upset anyone. To me it seems a surprising attitude by the TV companies, and I wondered whether anyone could offer any reasoning as to why. Bit surprised my post has attracted such attention to be honest.
I must say Aries, you've got to admire our plucky little neighbours for having a go while they're 21 places below us.
Bravo!
"Hadn't intended to upset anyone."
Chillax. You haven't.
And I was being quite generous with my thread title.
Instead of entitling the thread "West Brom Attract Little TV Interest.." I could have put "West Brom Attract NO TV Interest.." I chose to be kinder.
Credit where it's due.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
Its ok though. Its natural to lash out at other when you're upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is exactly what you and your Wo1ve5 chum I Love Butt are doing.
Keep going though. Get rid of that hurt.
Bute, I suggest you contact Sky and ESPN for an explanation. Otherwise, I can recommend the odd internet feed so you can get your Albion fix.
Job done!
I promise you Tamwolf, there are no "upset" Albion fans. We are loving life in the fast lane.
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
Its ok though. Its natural to lash out at other when you're upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is exactly what you and your Wo1ve5 chum I Love Butt are doing.
Keep going though. Get rid of that hurt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm no lashing out. I am discussing a topic on our board. You are the one going off topic and making this about us.
Its ok to be upset Aries.
comment by Isle of Bute (U16473)
posted 1 minute ago
And I was being quite generous with my thread title.
Instead of entitling the thread "West Brom Attract Little TV Interest.." I could have put "West Brom Attract NO TV Interest.." I chose to be kinder.
Credit where it's due.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#mindthegap
Out of interest, when was the last time Wolves finished above Albion and when will the next time be?
comment by Alouion (U2095)
posted 44 seconds ago
I promise you Tamwolf, there are no "upset" Albion fans. We are loving life in the fast lane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fast lane
If playing 6 defenders is the fast lane, god knows what's going to happen when you hit traffic.
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
I watched Albion against Liverpool at the weekend. Albion were poor, but to be fair, Liverpool weren't "all that"!
Given a choice between being on "the box" more often than Strictly Come feckin' Dancing or being mid-table in the Prem, I know which I'd prefer.
You're still going a bit off topic Aries. The topic is about the snub on WBA.
What do you think the reasoning is behind it? Genuine question.
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bute's article is fact. You are not appearing on Sky or BT in the aforementioned period, despite them showing 36 games (that's enough games for every team to appear 3.6 times).
Seems pretty accurate to me. The name calling shows how upset you are though. Its ok. Let it out.
comment by Cyp (U16330)
posted 2 minutes ago
I watched Albion against Liverpool at the weekend. Albion were poor, but to be fair, Liverpool weren't "all that"!
Given a choice between being on "the box" more often than Strictly Come feckin' Dancing or being mid-table in the Prem, I know which I'd prefer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What were you watching it on mate?
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bute's article is fact. You are not appearing on Sky or BT in the aforementioned period, despite them showing 36 games (that's enough games for every team to appear 3.6 times).
Seems pretty accurate to me. The name calling shows how upset you are though. Its ok. Let it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If I'd known the article would cause so much upset, I wouldn't have drawn attention to it.
It's all very well I Love Butt writing hopelessly inaccurate articles, but Wolves trying to take the p*** out of Albion?
Wolves attract less TV interest.
During the first 4 months of the 2011-12 Premier League season (the last time Wolves we're in the top flight) Albion were on either Sky or ESPN 4 times to the Dingles 3.
Just sayin’.
#mindthegap
Aries - I guess it's their Christmas present to us. Another chance to let them know who the better team - by miles and miles and miles....
In the 2011-12 season Albion made £13 million more than Wolves from TV broadcasting!
It's all gone a bit quiet on here!
Alouion, they sell their best player for 'footballing reasons' - one Richard Stearman, would you believe. I kid you not. He who goes on rampaging runs only to fall flat on his face on the halfway line.
Their best player, mark you.
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 minute ago
In the 2011-12 season Albion made £13 million more than Wolves from TV broadcasting!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn't that the last time Wolves were in the same division as Albion?
how is it that "in the money" albions chairman has told pulis he has to sell before he can buy ?
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 14 minutes ago
It's all very well I Love Butt writing hopelessly inaccurate articles, but Wolves trying to take the p*** out of Albion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write the article, Aries - it is from the BBC website. (I did provide a hyperlink.) What's inaccurate about it, out of interest?
Sign in if you want to comment
West Brom Attract Little TV Interest..
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 15/12/15
comment by aries22 (U1203)
Poor effort by I Love Butt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsie, I was simply highlighting an article that appeared today. Hadn't intended to upset anyone. To me it seems a surprising attitude by the TV companies, and I wondered whether anyone could offer any reasoning as to why. Bit surprised my post has attracted such attention to be honest.
posted on 15/12/15
I must say Aries, you've got to admire our plucky little neighbours for having a go while they're 21 places below us.
Bravo!
posted on 15/12/15
"Hadn't intended to upset anyone."
Chillax. You haven't.
posted on 15/12/15
And I was being quite generous with my thread title.
Instead of entitling the thread "West Brom Attract Little TV Interest.." I could have put "West Brom Attract NO TV Interest.." I chose to be kinder.
Credit where it's due.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
Its ok though. Its natural to lash out at other when you're upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is exactly what you and your Wo1ve5 chum I Love Butt are doing.
Keep going though. Get rid of that hurt.
posted on 15/12/15
Bute, I suggest you contact Sky and ESPN for an explanation. Otherwise, I can recommend the odd internet feed so you can get your Albion fix.
Job done!
posted on 15/12/15
I promise you Tamwolf, there are no "upset" Albion fans. We are loving life in the fast lane.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
Its ok though. Its natural to lash out at other when you're upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is exactly what you and your Wo1ve5 chum I Love Butt are doing.
Keep going though. Get rid of that hurt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm no lashing out. I am discussing a topic on our board. You are the one going off topic and making this about us.
Its ok to be upset Aries.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by Isle of Bute (U16473)
posted 1 minute ago
And I was being quite generous with my thread title.
Instead of entitling the thread "West Brom Attract Little TV Interest.." I could have put "West Brom Attract NO TV Interest.." I chose to be kinder.
Credit where it's due.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#mindthegap
posted on 15/12/15
Out of interest, when was the last time Wolves finished above Albion and when will the next time be?
posted on 15/12/15
comment by Alouion (U2095)
posted 44 seconds ago
I promise you Tamwolf, there are no "upset" Albion fans. We are loving life in the fast lane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fast lane
If playing 6 defenders is the fast lane, god knows what's going to happen when you hit traffic.
posted on 15/12/15
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
posted on 15/12/15
I watched Albion against Liverpool at the weekend. Albion were poor, but to be fair, Liverpool weren't "all that"!
Given a choice between being on "the box" more often than Strictly Come feckin' Dancing or being mid-table in the Prem, I know which I'd prefer.
posted on 15/12/15
You're still going a bit off topic Aries. The topic is about the snub on WBA.
What do you think the reasoning is behind it? Genuine question.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bute's article is fact. You are not appearing on Sky or BT in the aforementioned period, despite them showing 36 games (that's enough games for every team to appear 3.6 times).
Seems pretty accurate to me. The name calling shows how upset you are though. Its ok. Let it out.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by Cyp (U16330)
posted 2 minutes ago
I watched Albion against Liverpool at the weekend. Albion were poor, but to be fair, Liverpool weren't "all that"!
Given a choice between being on "the box" more often than Strictly Come feckin' Dancing or being mid-table in the Prem, I know which I'd prefer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What were you watching it on mate?
posted on 15/12/15
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 1 minute ago
Let's face it, my analysis of Wolves' situation is far more accurate than anything contained in I Love Butt's little article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bute's article is fact. You are not appearing on Sky or BT in the aforementioned period, despite them showing 36 games (that's enough games for every team to appear 3.6 times).
Seems pretty accurate to me. The name calling shows how upset you are though. Its ok. Let it out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If I'd known the article would cause so much upset, I wouldn't have drawn attention to it.
posted on 15/12/15
It's all very well I Love Butt writing hopelessly inaccurate articles, but Wolves trying to take the p*** out of Albion?
posted on 15/12/15
Wolves attract less TV interest.
During the first 4 months of the 2011-12 Premier League season (the last time Wolves we're in the top flight) Albion were on either Sky or ESPN 4 times to the Dingles 3.
Just sayin’.
#mindthegap
posted on 15/12/15
Aries - I guess it's their Christmas present to us. Another chance to let them know who the better team - by miles and miles and miles....
posted on 15/12/15
In the 2011-12 season Albion made £13 million more than Wolves from TV broadcasting!
It's all gone a bit quiet on here!
posted on 15/12/15
Alouion, they sell their best player for 'footballing reasons' - one Richard Stearman, would you believe. I kid you not. He who goes on rampaging runs only to fall flat on his face on the halfway line.
Their best player, mark you.
posted on 15/12/15
comment by cox-in-the-box (U1363)
posted 1 minute ago
In the 2011-12 season Albion made £13 million more than Wolves from TV broadcasting!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasn't that the last time Wolves were in the same division as Albion?
posted on 15/12/15
how is it that "in the money" albions chairman has told pulis he has to sell before he can buy ?
posted on 15/12/15
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 14 minutes ago
It's all very well I Love Butt writing hopelessly inaccurate articles, but Wolves trying to take the p*** out of Albion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write the article, Aries - it is from the BBC website. (I did provide a hyperlink.) What's inaccurate about it, out of interest?
Page 2 of 6
6