If its umpires call the team team reviewing the decision should not lose 1 of the calls if its hitting the wicket. Thats my only problem.
Wow.... I love that India believe 50-50 decisions go against them because they don't want DRS. Talk about excuses and paranoia
India shouldn't get a choice in the matter. They should just be forced to comply with ICC rules, which with the technology available, should involve the use of DRS.
If they don't comply, they should not take part. you cannot simply decide you don't want free hits used in your ODI's, similarly India shouldn't get the choice in this
Agree, but until the icc make it mandatory, every team has a right to withdraw
India should not be given a choice ... this shows how weak and useless the ICC are.
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another joke comment. India can well afford it. So can Australia, England, Pakistan and all the test playing countries.
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another joke comment. India can well afford it. So can Australia, England, Pakistan and all the test playing countries.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumbest comment
All the test playing nations cannot afford it. Thats why, when some nations, excluding India, have played it has not been implemented
Now, do I agree with India's decision to say no to DRS? No
However, until it is mandatory, every nation has aright to say no. You see the difference?
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
India clearly feel they (generally) benefit from bad decisions
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean my factual comparison???
the current rules allow india to avoid using DRS and you say india can do what they want.
The current rules allow Amir to play international cricket and you whine like a stuck pig.
I don't see your point. do you?
You make extreme comparisons, they are no way similar, but using it just to justify your pathetic argument.
You'd make an excellent politician
Lefty sorry but your argument stems from something said about 4 years ago by the then BCCI President - things have moved on since then! Yes its not 100 per cent foolproof but what the heck is? Are you going to stop driving in a car because its not 100% safe? The fact is umpires make BAD calls, sometimes because they are inept or sometimes because they genuinely make mistakes. I think U2 is right, ICC should make it mandatory and EVERYONE should apply by the rules.
comment by drbantam (U8991)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
Lefty sorry but your argument stems from something said about 4 years ago by the then BCCI President - things have moved on since then! Yes its not 100 per cent foolproof but what the heck is? Are you going to stop driving in a car because its not 100% safe? The fact is umpires make BAD calls, sometimes because they are inept or sometimes because they genuinely make mistakes. I think U2 is right, ICC should make it mandatory and EVERYONE should apply by the rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not doubt Drs and it's benefits. Please see previous post.
All nations can't afford it, hence it is not mandatory
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 9 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean my factual comparison???
the current rules allow india to avoid using DRS and you say india can do what they want.
The current rules allow Amir to play international cricket and you whine like a stuck pig.
I don't see your point. do you?
___________________
Ohhh dear. Dear dear dear....
Comment deleted by Article Creator
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 4 hours, 22 minutes ago
All nations can't afford it, hence it is not mandatory
----------------------------------------------------------------------
same bs you've already spouted before. which main nations cannot afford it? india?????
Sign in if you want to comment
Still not convinced about DRS!!!
Page 1 of 2
posted on 13/1/16
love the one star pindis
posted on 13/1/16
If its umpires call the team team reviewing the decision should not lose 1 of the calls if its hitting the wicket. Thats my only problem.
posted on 13/1/16
at the 1 stars
posted on 13/1/16
posted on 13/1/16
Wow.... I love that India believe 50-50 decisions go against them because they don't want DRS. Talk about excuses and paranoia
posted on 14/1/16
India shouldn't get a choice in the matter. They should just be forced to comply with ICC rules, which with the technology available, should involve the use of DRS.
If they don't comply, they should not take part. you cannot simply decide you don't want free hits used in your ODI's, similarly India shouldn't get the choice in this
posted on 14/1/16
Agree, but until the icc make it mandatory, every team has a right to withdraw
posted on 15/1/16
India should not be given a choice ... this shows how weak and useless the ICC are.
posted on 15/1/16
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
posted on 15/1/16
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
posted on 15/1/16
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another joke comment. India can well afford it. So can Australia, England, Pakistan and all the test playing countries.
posted on 15/1/16
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 35 minutes ago
because the ICC are being run by India for money reasons.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or the fact it costs alot of money to implement DRS at all grounds, and many cannot afford it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another joke comment. India can well afford it. So can Australia, England, Pakistan and all the test playing countries.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumbest comment
All the test playing nations cannot afford it. Thats why, when some nations, excluding India, have played it has not been implemented
Now, do I agree with India's decision to say no to DRS? No
However, until it is mandatory, every nation has aright to say no. You see the difference?
posted on 15/1/16
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
posted on 16/1/16
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 16/1/16
India clearly feel they (generally) benefit from bad decisions
posted on 17/1/16
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
posted on 18/1/16
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
posted on 18/1/16
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean my factual comparison???
the current rules allow india to avoid using DRS and you say india can do what they want.
The current rules allow Amir to play international cricket and you whine like a stuck pig.
I don't see your point. do you?
posted on 18/1/16
You make extreme comparisons, they are no way similar, but using it just to justify your pathetic argument.
You'd make an excellent politician
posted on 18/1/16
Lefty sorry but your argument stems from something said about 4 years ago by the then BCCI President - things have moved on since then! Yes its not 100 per cent foolproof but what the heck is? Are you going to stop driving in a car because its not 100% safe? The fact is umpires make BAD calls, sometimes because they are inept or sometimes because they genuinely make mistakes. I think U2 is right, ICC should make it mandatory and EVERYONE should apply by the rules.
posted on 18/1/16
comment by drbantam (U8991)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
Lefty sorry but your argument stems from something said about 4 years ago by the then BCCI President - things have moved on since then! Yes its not 100 per cent foolproof but what the heck is? Are you going to stop driving in a car because its not 100% safe? The fact is umpires make BAD calls, sometimes because they are inept or sometimes because they genuinely make mistakes. I think U2 is right, ICC should make it mandatory and EVERYONE should apply by the rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not doubt Drs and it's benefits. Please see previous post.
posted on 18/1/16
All nations can't afford it, hence it is not mandatory
posted on 18/1/16
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 9 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
comment by U2 (U20610)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
Please tell us which test playing nations cannot afford it.
So, because the rules allow it, India chooses not to allow the use of DRS and you agree that they have the choice.
So, because the rules allow Amir to play international cricket again, you whine like a stuck pig.
See the difference???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that the best you can do when you get your ass handed to you???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just have a look at comparison you made nit wit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you mean my factual comparison???
the current rules allow india to avoid using DRS and you say india can do what they want.
The current rules allow Amir to play international cricket and you whine like a stuck pig.
I don't see your point. do you?
___________________
Ohhh dear. Dear dear dear....
posted on 18/1/16
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 18/1/16
comment by Lefty (U17934)
posted 4 hours, 22 minutes ago
All nations can't afford it, hence it is not mandatory
----------------------------------------------------------------------
same bs you've already spouted before. which main nations cannot afford it? india?????
Page 1 of 2