Why though? What is he's motive / point?

I think so. The documentary was brilliant but quite biased - do a bit of reading around the evidence that was left out and it seems pretty damning. I do think evidence was planted to help it along though.

That poor kid Brendan on the other hand, I reckon is completely innocent.

I'm sure he's lawyer has got like 17 people off before though in similar situations and only takes cases like that if she thinks they are genuinely not guilty

Also why life in prison not death row? And still continuing to plead innocence 11 years on?

It's like the whole essex boys killer that are in jail and have been for like 20 years yet both are innocent

No chance and I'm well angry about it. Fooking disgrace!

Not a chance in hell he did. Poor man, poor men the two of them. Lives ruined by tunnel visionedlaw enforcement

Dodgy as that conviction... The by question which makes me believe he didn't do it is why on earth would you kill some random person that has nothing to do with you going to jail in the first place!?

I don't think he did it and for that reason.. I'm out

You bet he did, now trying to play the innocent miscarriage of justice victim. What they did to that woman they deserved the death penalty.
Documentary totally biased in his favour, that's the reason why so mmany people seem to think he's innocent.