or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 102 comments are related to an article called:

Most Stupid Comment in History of JA606?

Page 3 of 5

posted on 24/2/16

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 minutes ago
He talks out of his backside and frequently contradicts himself and then struggles to fight his way out of the corner he backs himself to.
===========
This

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I read, half the posters on here do the same. Doesn't mean they all need childish articles made about them.

posted on 24/2/16

Extremely boring and pathetic to call someone out like that.....says a lot about the OP in my opinion....

If you want to play kisschase go and do it somewhere else, this is a football forum, not a kiddies playground!

posted on 24/2/16

Admins - shame on you for allowing articles like this to come prevalent on the site.

You do realise that it is this nonsense that discourages others from posting, contributing, or even looking on the site?

posted on 24/2/16

Full Back Killer,

Calling out our own fans is not my cup of tea, especially by writing a thread about it, no need, we are ALL spurs.

=======================

I dont really see it even matters that we are all Spurs. I wouldn't condone it regardless of club alliances.

Chronic and Analog cannot enjoy being part of a forum unless they are doubling up and insulting one poster or another.

I see its Sizzle and sandy's turn in this article.

It wouldn't surprise me if Chronic and Analog were either the same poster, or know eachother off the forum.

posted on 24/2/16

prideofNL,

I couldn't agree more .

Get this rubbish off the boards...and preferably can you take the creators of such articles with them...

posted on 24/2/16

comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 14 seconds ago
prideofNL,

I couldn't agree more.

Get this rubbish off the boards...and preferably can you take the creators of such articles with them...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree too. Why should Sandy (or anyone) have to a) get a fairly insulting article made about him, and then b) get a dozen or so posters ganging up to b!tch about him, just because he offers a different opinion? Really immature, says a lot about the people engaging in this.

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 24/2/16

the complaints would be credible if they came from anyone other than Chicken - a poster widely acknowledged to be stubborn, argumentative, and twists the truth constantly

comment by Analog (U17200)

posted on 24/2/16

Sandy loves a wum and gives as good as he gets, some people need to stop being so sensitive

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 24/2/16

comment by prideofNL (U9819)



posted 58 minutes ago


Extremely boring and pathetic to call someone out like that.....says a lot about the OP in my opinion....

-------

you are entitled to your opinion just like I am entitled to mine.

you have just as much freedom to write articles of their choice, and have the choice whether to, or not to comment on this article, or any other article.

you also have the choice whether to use this forum, or any alternative forum.


in conclusion, as this article doesn't break any law, or contravene any house rules, then it is perfectly entitled to remain

posted on 24/2/16

I'm not lowering myself to bother retaliating Chronic. This stuff is poor / pitiful.

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 24/2/16

chicken taking the moral high ground

have heard it all now.

comment by (U18543)

posted on 24/2/16

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/2/16

comment by HK10 (U6965)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 14 seconds ago
prideofNL,

I couldn't agree more.

Get this rubbish off the boards...and preferably can you take the creators of such articles with them...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree too. Why should Sandy (or anyone) have to a) get a fairly insulting article made about him, and then b) get a dozen or so posters ganging up to b!tch about him, just because he offers a different opinion? Really immature, says a lot about the people engaging in this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy welcome to my world 😂

posted on 24/2/16

sandy_clown living up to his name again.

posted on 24/2/16

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 24/2/16

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 24/2/16

comment by #4zA (U19575)
posted 3 minutes ago
what a stupid artical
----------------------------------------------------------------------
shame sandy has filtered me. he cannot see it

posted on 24/2/16

If you don't like the article, don't comment on it.

To those of you who create the perfect articles, go ahead and do so rather than spending your time on here would be my advice

posted on 24/2/16

shame sandy has filtered me. he cannot see it

===================

Ahh...now we appear to be getting to the real crux of the article. Chronic obviously thought in all his wisdom that if he writes a pathetic WUM article about sandy, it may somehow goad sandy enough to unfilter him without further delay desperate to post on the article.

Although it seems, thus far, sandy has risen above it, and is having the last laugh at Chronic's expense. Well played sandy .

comment by Chronic (U3423)

posted on 24/2/16

chicken you had the balls to admit you were wrong about chadli v lesta yet, or are you still hiding behind the team sheet you coward

?

posted on 24/2/16

comment by Chicken_ (U1043)
posted 4 hours, 37 minutes ago
shame sandy has filtered me. he cannot see it

===================

Ahh...now we appear to be getting to the real crux of the article. Chronic obviously thought in all his wisdom that if he writes a pathetic WUM article about sandy, it may somehow goad sandy enough to unfilter him without further delay desperate to post on the article.

Although it seems, thus far, sandy has risen above it, and is having the last laugh at Chronic's expense. Well played sandy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pleased sandy hasnt risen to it - what a frikin poor excuse for an article this is, and the op is such a t@sser that he doesnt even acknowledge it, despite a good 10 or so posters telling him its a complete sh!tshow.

posted on 24/2/16

Chicken, not sure why Sandy is getting applause. He's only filtered Chronic because Chronic regularly puts the fool in his place. This article is childish, to be fair, but no more childish than a man that professes to be in his 60's yet acts like teenager.

posted on 24/2/16

Sandy filtered me for asking if the traffic light situation in Enfield causing problems in and out of Sainsburys had been resolved.

posted on 24/2/16

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
Sandy filtered me for asking if the traffic light situation in Enfield causing problems in and out of Sainsburys had been resolved.
-------------------------------------------------
Don't be a muppet - he probably filtered you for the consistent p!ss taking and keyboard warrior name-calling like "crusty old spunker" and the like - as do many of the pack of caaants on this site ffs

posted on 24/2/16

Highlight where I called him a "crusty old spunker" please

He literally filtered me for asking about a traffic situation.

Page 3 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment