she has nothing to be ashamed off
johnson has done well for sunderland
football and results matter, nothing else
Surely the point is that he admitted his guilt to her. He should then have been suspended until the outcome of the trial. A statement could have been issued saying he was being rested on full pay because of stress. By doing what she did she was letting the girl suffer even though she knew the truth. The simple fact is that he knowingly indulged in sexual activity with a 15 year old and that is a crime. She knew this. I've a child (I emphasise CHILD) about to turn 15. Thank God most people aren't like Johnson or this woman.
I'm with you, Ingleby. I think it is disgusting. They had him play simply to get the results. They don't have to be judge and jury but they didn't have to have him playing in front of thousands of people, he was being cheered on when he scored that equiliser against Liverpool the weekend before he changed his plea to guilty. I hope Sunderland get relegated for this.
and they were right.... if they stay up it would be worth it..surely
Anybody that thinks the 15 year old is an innocent is an idiot - Adam Johnson had to be punished because she is under age but her actions were not those of an innocent...
The 15yo is NOT on trial.
comment by ItsAboutTheBackFour (U9916)
posted 17 minutes ago
Anybody that thinks the 15 year old is an innocent is an idiot - Adam Johnson had to be punished because she is under age but her actions were not those of an innocent...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf is that supposed to mean? She was under 16, and therefore could not consent, legally this is not a grey area.
It is shocking Johnson got 6 years and is viewed as a monster now.
Why?
Because Graham Rix and other footballers have done the same and did they get a custodial sentence or were deemed as a monster?
What about R. Kelly, seems to have a thing for 14 year olds or Billy Wyman seem to have a thing for a 13 year old.
But that is OK, is it. Or the past doesn't matter.
Roman Polanski is another, who likes to drug his victims before, but plenty of your favourite stars still like to work for him.
The media plays all of you for fools and you fall for it every-time.
You seem to be under the illusion we are happy about the other outcomes. What a pathetic strawman argument!
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 29 minutes ago
You seem to be under the illusion we are happy about the other outcomes. What a pathetic strawman argument!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, point me to the media campaign groups and the masses of public opinion that have sought to bring these men to justice and see them as the monsters Adam Johnson is.
Don't think you know what a strawman is as well. Ironic that you used it to create the illusion you defeated my argument by implying you are not happy about it equates to the the response Johnson got from the media, public and the courts.
You are trying to go at us using other examples that no one here has said they were happy with the outcomes. We aren't happy with those either, so don't try and use them to defend AJ or to try and call our condemnation of AJ. Get it now?
Also, any decent person would be happy that someone that used his position to take advantage of an underage girl but I guess you are not that.
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 24 minutes ago
Also, any decent person would be happy that someone that used his position to take advantage of an underage girl but I guess you are not that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you mean wouldn't.
But you seem a bit slow on the uptake, being happy or not happy is not what this is about.
If you don't see the disparity in the cases I have pointed out, then you are a fool. And they are far worse that what Johnson was found guilty of with younger girls.
And I know personally friends of mine that have been in the same situation and they are fine with it.
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 30 minutes ago
You are trying to go at us using other examples that no one here has said they were happy with the outcomes. We aren't happy with those either, so don't try and use them to defend AJ or to try and call our condemnation of AJ. Get it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Happy and not happy, there you go again, are they the two extremes you go to, or is your vocabulary that of an 5 year old?
"I'm with you, Ingleby. I think it is disgusting. They had him play simply to get the results."
What a load of boll ocks
"I hope Sunderland get relegated for this."
For what . . . . letting him con us, like he did everybody else ? . . . . what a t it
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Sunderland Chief Exec resigns
Page 1 of 1
posted on 8/3/16
she has nothing to be ashamed off
johnson has done well for sunderland
football and results matter, nothing else
posted on 8/3/16
Surely the point is that he admitted his guilt to her. He should then have been suspended until the outcome of the trial. A statement could have been issued saying he was being rested on full pay because of stress. By doing what she did she was letting the girl suffer even though she knew the truth. The simple fact is that he knowingly indulged in sexual activity with a 15 year old and that is a crime. She knew this. I've a child (I emphasise CHILD) about to turn 15. Thank God most people aren't like Johnson or this woman.
posted on 8/3/16
good point Ingleby
posted on 8/3/16
I'm with you, Ingleby. I think it is disgusting. They had him play simply to get the results. They don't have to be judge and jury but they didn't have to have him playing in front of thousands of people, he was being cheered on when he scored that equiliser against Liverpool the weekend before he changed his plea to guilty. I hope Sunderland get relegated for this.
posted on 8/3/16
and they were right.... if they stay up it would be worth it..surely
posted on 8/3/16
Anybody that thinks the 15 year old is an innocent is an idiot - Adam Johnson had to be punished because she is under age but her actions were not those of an innocent...
posted on 8/3/16
The 15yo is NOT on trial.
posted on 8/3/16
comment by ItsAboutTheBackFour (U9916)
posted 17 minutes ago
Anybody that thinks the 15 year old is an innocent is an idiot - Adam Johnson had to be punished because she is under age but her actions were not those of an innocent...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wtf is that supposed to mean? She was under 16, and therefore could not consent, legally this is not a grey area.
posted on 15/5/16
It is shocking Johnson got 6 years and is viewed as a monster now.
Why?
Because Graham Rix and other footballers have done the same and did they get a custodial sentence or were deemed as a monster?
What about R. Kelly, seems to have a thing for 14 year olds or Billy Wyman seem to have a thing for a 13 year old.
But that is OK, is it. Or the past doesn't matter.
Roman Polanski is another, who likes to drug his victims before, but plenty of your favourite stars still like to work for him.
The media plays all of you for fools and you fall for it every-time.
posted on 15/5/16
You seem to be under the illusion we are happy about the other outcomes. What a pathetic strawman argument!
posted on 15/5/16
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 29 minutes ago
You seem to be under the illusion we are happy about the other outcomes. What a pathetic strawman argument!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, point me to the media campaign groups and the masses of public opinion that have sought to bring these men to justice and see them as the monsters Adam Johnson is.
Don't think you know what a strawman is as well. Ironic that you used it to create the illusion you defeated my argument by implying you are not happy about it equates to the the response Johnson got from the media, public and the courts.
posted on 15/5/16
You are trying to go at us using other examples that no one here has said they were happy with the outcomes. We aren't happy with those either, so don't try and use them to defend AJ or to try and call our condemnation of AJ. Get it now?
posted on 15/5/16
Also, any decent person would be happy that someone that used his position to take advantage of an underage girl but I guess you are not that.
posted on 15/5/16
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 24 minutes ago
Also, any decent person would be happy that someone that used his position to take advantage of an underage girl but I guess you are not that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you mean wouldn't.
But you seem a bit slow on the uptake, being happy or not happy is not what this is about.
If you don't see the disparity in the cases I have pointed out, then you are a fool. And they are far worse that what Johnson was found guilty of with younger girls.
And I know personally friends of mine that have been in the same situation and they are fine with it.
posted on 15/5/16
comment by Wump (U5046)
posted 30 minutes ago
You are trying to go at us using other examples that no one here has said they were happy with the outcomes. We aren't happy with those either, so don't try and use them to defend AJ or to try and call our condemnation of AJ. Get it now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Happy and not happy, there you go again, are they the two extremes you go to, or is your vocabulary that of an 5 year old?
posted on 14/6/16
"I'm with you, Ingleby. I think it is disgusting. They had him play simply to get the results."
What a load of boll ocks
"I hope Sunderland get relegated for this."
For what . . . . letting him con us, like he did everybody else ? . . . . what a t it
Page 1 of 1