I would take Ox in a heartbeat. Very high ceiling that boy, and I think he'd suit our game down to the ground.
would definetely keep Walcott. I am not sure about Ox, for me he is simply not dangerous enough in front of the goal. I totally agree that they would come good under a different manager. Therefore they have to change the club, even though I would hate to see ths in Theo's case.
For me its Theo out and keep the Ox (only 22). Though I am surprised Theo has not been given a shot at CF since early in the season. I hope to never see Theo on the wing again.
I definitely would not sell them. The players I would like to see go this Summer:
Debuchy
Gabriel
Szczesney (loan if Ospina stays)
Arteta
Flamini
Rosicky
Sanogo
Giroud (if we sign a top striker)
Also wouldn't be bothered if Ramsey and Mertesacker were shipped out.
Why would se well Per?
He has been very good this season. Fans have the Chelsea game to mind but he has been solid this season and far better than Koscienly and the joke that is Gabriel
The assumption being, I am guessing, we sign new CBs.
Oxlade has to go on loan.
Walcott has to be sold. Just watching Rashford shows what a crap footballer Walcott is.
i would still rather lose someone like Welbeck than Walcott
Rashford also shows how poor Ox has been.
Walcott has had some very good season fans forget
Walcott is still capable of scoring goals whereas Ox hasn't shown anything
Wallcot needs too neck off from the club...a fair weather one dimensional player.
As for Ox, he has a high potential in him..He needs the right manager to nurture that talent out of him! Maybe the the 'gay thing' has effected his mentality and etc...but the boy is dangerously talented he needs to be nurtured.
Wenger will probably steal the cash from the their sales and we won't see any replacements so what's the point.
People still underrating Ramsey?
comment by oldboy2002 (U20062)
posted 45 seconds ago
Wenger will probably steal the cash from the their sales and we won't see any replacements so what's the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting rid of Theo is actually lot more than that...
He opens lightens the wage structure to be invested on proper players. The sale revenue used or not is always good to have than a rotting player who is stopping development of good players such as Iwobi, Campbell, Ox and more youngsters.
Those youngster have shown more hunger, desire, maturity then Theo Walnut ever has.
Walcot used to be decent on the right wing nowadays he's not even good there. He's used to have some sort of end product however these days he seems oeed off if dosnt play upfront.
Add the fack he's on anywhere between 110k -140k its a faking farce especially when someone like.Kane is on 70-80k.
comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 47 minutes ago
Why would se well Per?
He has been very good this season. Fans have the Chelsea game to mind but he has been solid this season and far better than Koscienly and the joke that is Gabriel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would keep him as backup ideally. We need a top CB this season because Gabriel has been shocking, Per is getting on and Kos has had his worst ever season for us. I don't think Per would be willing to stay on as a backup CB though. Likewise I would keep Ramsey as a squad player but he thinks he's Ronaldinho and wouldn't be willing to play a squad role imo
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 9 minutes ago
Walcot used to be decent on the right wing nowadays he's not even good there. He's used to have some sort of end product however these days he seems oeed off if dosnt play upfront.
Add the fack he's on anywhere between 110k -140k its a faking farce especially when someone like.Kane is on 70-80k.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh it's not a farce, if he goes to Liverpool, United, City or Chelsea who would all take him, he would he on more than what he earns here. People need to stop their biiiiitch fits over Theo's wages and comparing them to waged of players at Leicester or Spurs who WILL jump once somebody with serious money comes in and takes them
Walcott & Oxlade-Chamberlain are not a good bet, they have consistently failed to deliver and are unlikely to improve now - they are soft and you don't win titles with players like these.
Definitely time to get rid, we've given them enough chances.
We are expected to lose Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini in the summer. We wont buy more than 3 players so must keep everyone else.
We have already replaced Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini
whatever they do it will be the same old season next year....good start.....blow out the league cup... asap....win a few ...2nd in cl group.....hull at home in 3rd rnd fa cup....level on points at top in feb.....lose in 1st ko v some decent spanish team...in cl...win 2 out of 10 games in pl up to april..lose in fa cup to reading in 6th rnd..end up 4th in table.....am i right or am i right...
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 44 minutes ago
We have already replaced Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Elneny is replacing all 3 is he?
Sorry, Castor, but couldn't disagree more... tbh haven't even bothered to read your article... apologies for that. But if two players optimised the acceptance of failure during their time at Arsenal, it's Walcott and Chamberlain.
Personally, I want them both gone in the summer. Nice guys, but fack me, both useless when it counts. (Which for us is, sadly, not often enough.)
And Theo... I mean... the guy is called Theo.
So would you get rid of them and settle for Iwobi and Campbell for the season?
Iwobi has already shown he is tens times the player Walcott could ever be. For a start he can control a football.Would still keep the Ox but as for Theo sell him for anything over 4 million to some other mugs who are prepared to pay his wages and tolerate a useless underperforming injury ridden player who just isnt a footballer.
Walcott is awful. He's failed at Arsenal considering the investment and hype. He's a useful weapon to have but his demands in position and wage held us back last summer.
Time to get rid. Also if we stuck with Theo for 10 years then the more talented Ox deserves just as much time. Ox has still produced huge European performances and is the best outlet at the club.
Theo's done sell to West Ham. Would sell Welbeck before both mind.
Sign in if you want to comment
We should keep both Walcott & Ox
Page 1 of 2
posted on 23/4/16
I would take Ox in a heartbeat. Very high ceiling that boy, and I think he'd suit our game down to the ground.
posted on 23/4/16
would definetely keep Walcott. I am not sure about Ox, for me he is simply not dangerous enough in front of the goal. I totally agree that they would come good under a different manager. Therefore they have to change the club, even though I would hate to see ths in Theo's case.
posted on 23/4/16
For me its Theo out and keep the Ox (only 22). Though I am surprised Theo has not been given a shot at CF since early in the season. I hope to never see Theo on the wing again.
posted on 23/4/16
I definitely would not sell them. The players I would like to see go this Summer:
Debuchy
Gabriel
Szczesney (loan if Ospina stays)
Arteta
Flamini
Rosicky
Sanogo
Giroud (if we sign a top striker)
Also wouldn't be bothered if Ramsey and Mertesacker were shipped out.
posted on 23/4/16
Why would se well Per?
He has been very good this season. Fans have the Chelsea game to mind but he has been solid this season and far better than Koscienly and the joke that is Gabriel
posted on 23/4/16
The assumption being, I am guessing, we sign new CBs.
posted on 23/4/16
Oxlade has to go on loan.
Walcott has to be sold. Just watching Rashford shows what a crap footballer Walcott is.
posted on 23/4/16
i would still rather lose someone like Welbeck than Walcott
posted on 23/4/16
Rashford also shows how poor Ox has been.
Walcott has had some very good season fans forget
Walcott is still capable of scoring goals whereas Ox hasn't shown anything
posted on 23/4/16
Wallcot needs too neck off from the club...a fair weather one dimensional player.
As for Ox, he has a high potential in him..He needs the right manager to nurture that talent out of him! Maybe the the 'gay thing' has effected his mentality and etc...but the boy is dangerously talented he needs to be nurtured.
posted on 23/4/16
Wenger will probably steal the cash from the their sales and we won't see any replacements so what's the point.
posted on 23/4/16
People still underrating Ramsey?
posted on 23/4/16
comment by oldboy2002 (U20062)
posted 45 seconds ago
Wenger will probably steal the cash from the their sales and we won't see any replacements so what's the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting rid of Theo is actually lot more than that...
He opens lightens the wage structure to be invested on proper players. The sale revenue used or not is always good to have than a rotting player who is stopping development of good players such as Iwobi, Campbell, Ox and more youngsters.
Those youngster have shown more hunger, desire, maturity then Theo Walnut ever has.
posted on 23/4/16
Walcot used to be decent on the right wing nowadays he's not even good there. He's used to have some sort of end product however these days he seems oeed off if dosnt play upfront.
Add the fack he's on anywhere between 110k -140k its a faking farce especially when someone like.Kane is on 70-80k.
posted on 23/4/16
comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 47 minutes ago
Why would se well Per?
He has been very good this season. Fans have the Chelsea game to mind but he has been solid this season and far better than Koscienly and the joke that is Gabriel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would keep him as backup ideally. We need a top CB this season because Gabriel has been shocking, Per is getting on and Kos has had his worst ever season for us. I don't think Per would be willing to stay on as a backup CB though. Likewise I would keep Ramsey as a squad player but he thinks he's Ronaldinho and wouldn't be willing to play a squad role imo
posted on 23/4/16
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 9 minutes ago
Walcot used to be decent on the right wing nowadays he's not even good there. He's used to have some sort of end product however these days he seems oeed off if dosnt play upfront.
Add the fack he's on anywhere between 110k -140k its a faking farce especially when someone like.Kane is on 70-80k.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh it's not a farce, if he goes to Liverpool, United, City or Chelsea who would all take him, he would he on more than what he earns here. People need to stop their biiiiitch fits over Theo's wages and comparing them to waged of players at Leicester or Spurs who WILL jump once somebody with serious money comes in and takes them
posted on 23/4/16
Walcott & Oxlade-Chamberlain are not a good bet, they have consistently failed to deliver and are unlikely to improve now - they are soft and you don't win titles with players like these.
Definitely time to get rid, we've given them enough chances.
posted on 23/4/16
We are expected to lose Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini in the summer. We wont buy more than 3 players so must keep everyone else.
posted on 23/4/16
We have already replaced Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini
posted on 23/4/16
whatever they do it will be the same old season next year....good start.....blow out the league cup... asap....win a few ...2nd in cl group.....hull at home in 3rd rnd fa cup....level on points at top in feb.....lose in 1st ko v some decent spanish team...in cl...win 2 out of 10 games in pl up to april..lose in fa cup to reading in 6th rnd..end up 4th in table.....am i right or am i right...
posted on 23/4/16
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 44 minutes ago
We have already replaced Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Elneny is replacing all 3 is he?
posted on 23/4/16
Sorry, Castor, but couldn't disagree more... tbh haven't even bothered to read your article... apologies for that. But if two players optimised the acceptance of failure during their time at Arsenal, it's Walcott and Chamberlain.
Personally, I want them both gone in the summer. Nice guys, but fack me, both useless when it counts. (Which for us is, sadly, not often enough.)
And Theo... I mean... the guy is called Theo.
posted on 23/4/16
So would you get rid of them and settle for Iwobi and Campbell for the season?
posted on 24/4/16
Iwobi has already shown he is tens times the player Walcott could ever be. For a start he can control a football.Would still keep the Ox but as for Theo sell him for anything over 4 million to some other mugs who are prepared to pay his wages and tolerate a useless underperforming injury ridden player who just isnt a footballer.
posted on 24/4/16
Walcott is awful. He's failed at Arsenal considering the investment and hype. He's a useful weapon to have but his demands in position and wage held us back last summer.
Time to get rid. Also if we stuck with Theo for 10 years then the more talented Ox deserves just as much time. Ox has still produced huge European performances and is the best outlet at the club.
Theo's done sell to West Ham. Would sell Welbeck before both mind.
Page 1 of 2